Chevron Left
Вернуться к Python для науки о геномных данных

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Python для науки о геномных данных от партнера Университет Джонса Хопкинса

4.3
звезд
Оценки: 1,465

О курсе

This class provides an introduction to the Python programming language and the iPython notebook. This is the third course in the Genomic Big Data Science Specialization from Johns Hopkins University....

Лучшие рецензии

KR

16 июля 2018 г.

A very good course for its length and the amount of time it requires. It improved my python skills and knowledge of Genomics. I'm more engaged in my pursuits than before taking the course.

AN

14 июля 2022 г.

It was easy in the beginning but gets hard and changing at the end.

It was such an honor th have a course with Professor Salzburg.

I would recommend it to all bioinformatics lovers.

Фильтр по:

226–250 из 284 отзывов о курсе Python для науки о геномных данных

автор: Nguemaha M

25 нояб. 2018 г.

I took this course without a background in biology or genetics. The material sounds interesting but the lecturers rush through it so fast. They do not provide sufficient explanation of the biology to allow completion of the programming assignment. They ask to write a code for finding ORFs yet they don't even explain how ORFs are defined in case of multiple start codons and end codons.

автор: Bartłomiej P

19 июня 2020 г.

The course in no way prepares the student to complete the final exam of the course, if this course is for people without any prior python experience, I really pity the ones that had to go through it.

I myself had some experience but it was challenging for me to do the final quiz, but it was fun.

The course is overall good but needs some updates from the tutors.

автор: Rebecca M

2 авг. 2022 г.

The lectures were really good, and from having taken the Python For Everbody course I could keep up with what they were saying as they only taught the basics.

How ever, the exams were extremely difficult as they had not shown us how to write the code nessassary for the analysis!!!!! A lot of online help is needed to pass this course believe me.

автор: SIDDHARTHA P

24 апр. 2020 г.

Quite badly prepared course. The final exam assignment was challenging but unfortunately the methods etc to arrive at the solutions were not discussed in the main lecture of the course. It needs lot of working so that the focus should be given on learning rather than arbitrarily increasing the toughness level for the exam.

автор: Dave S

20 апр. 2020 г.

The assignments can be difficult with little guidance on the best approach to take and not to much activity on the forums. The questions can be difficult because of the formatting used and the way python uses format to decide program flow. The final exam takes considerably longer than the rest of the course

автор: Aditi D

7 июля 2020 г.

This course teaches you basics only, but when the questions are asked in the quiz they are no where related to what has been taught, and the level of difficulty of those questions is really high.

автор: Benson N M

17 июня 2016 г.

I think someone who has never coded before can approach this course. However, further reading of the resources presented will augment what has been taught and to better handle the quizzes.

автор: Antoon L

11 янв. 2017 г.

A good introduction to Python, but the course is a rather short & I think more could have been said about genomics-specific functions, modules, etc. and how to use them.

автор: Priscilla C

13 апр. 2017 г.

I didn't know anything about programming and needed a lot of help with this course. I would have like more help in getting python and its complements install. Thanks.

автор: SARKAFT G O

8 авг. 2020 г.

i have difficulty to understand the last week but in general , the course, is a first step to learn more about python and need more to apply it on genomic.

автор: Rami B

2 мая 2020 г.

Methods of assessment were far more difficult than lectures. However, the course does cover an appropriate overview of python in genomic data science.

автор: Prathana S

2 июля 2020 г.

Being new to Python it was quite difficult to me learning this. Also questions for quiz were quite hard as compared to examples shown in the video

автор: Vanessa

23 нояб. 2020 г.

Good teachers and well explained. Very interesting. I would have preferred to be followed by a tutor to have some explanations.

Thank you

автор: Ian P

23 мая 2018 г.

The final lecture on Biopython, and the exam exercise are good. The quiz questions are annoying because the indentation is messed up.

автор: Aditi D T

29 авг. 2020 г.

The quizzes were pretty standard, but the lecture was poorly designed. I really enjoyed solving the problems of the final exam!

автор: Violeta T p

14 янв. 2021 г.

El curso está bien, pero se hace difícil de seguir si no eres programador o no tienes ideas previas sobre el tema.

автор: Alex G

30 мар. 2016 г.

Can't easily understand one of the instructors. Dislike how it chops and changes instructors in the same course.

автор: Felipe B M

31 июля 2019 г.

This course is advanced and fast-paced. I found it difficult for those with minimal programming experience.

автор: Tarek M

6 дек. 2021 г.

there is no mixing between the scripts and the videos the final codes in week 4 are so defficult

автор: Ming L

7 дек. 2017 г.

one pretty lecturer, the other with relative faster speak speed, some small error in slides

автор: Janis B

6 апр. 2021 г.

This is more of a intro course for Python basics rather that Python for genomics.

автор: Konstantinos K

17 апр. 2017 г.

Good but need more practise problems in order to understand what you are learning

автор: Inmaculada M

19 мая 2017 г.

Dfficult to follow, at least for people without a background in programming.

автор: Stefanie M

20 июня 2017 г.

Course content is ok, but didn't prepare well enough for the final exam

автор: Michael G

24 февр. 2018 г.

Could use more focus on Biopython, less on fundamentals