Apr 24, 2018
The course is fairly advanced and you would need to review the materials many times to understand the concept. The assignments are definitely fun and not as straightforward as other courses.
Aug 25, 2017
Superb study material. Learnt a lot during this course. I am not much into mathematical stuff, but got a hang of how to break problems and improve efficiency through parallelism.
автор: Chet W•
Jan 29, 2018
Good class but sometimes the exercises seemed unnecessarily complicated for explaining the concepts.
автор: Álvaro L L•
Sep 24, 2016
Some missed explanations in the first week (mergedSort implementation)
Tha last two videos are quite difficult to understand. The ConcBuffer structure seems to be poweful, but the explanation and examples are tight.
In this course, the weekly tasks are explained very well. Thank you very much!
автор: Pedro R•
Mar 15, 2017
автор: Nikolay M•
Jun 09, 2016
On the plus side:
The material is presented in concise and efficient manner. It required little knowledge of Scala and JVM. It kept hidden the underlying implementation of parallelism and task utilities.
On the minus side:
The homeworks were easy. I could fill in the gaps almost automatically and I don't feel like I know the matter.
автор: Nikola P•
Nov 01, 2016
Very interesting course, I would recommend. I always wanted to learn about Scala parallel collections.
автор: Tim G•
Oct 22, 2017
Really good course covering some of the fundamentals of parallel programming, though for me I was hoping it would go into some of the Scala specifics a little more
автор: Rodrigo D•
Apr 01, 2017
Its a very good course! perhaps the in the practice code, before jumping into the problems they can provide a couple of simple examples/questions such that the main ideas are learnt.
автор: Gregory E•
Mar 29, 2018
For this course you should have Advanced English level. Cause sentesce construction is so difficult and words so unusual that i had to some times google what i have to do.
автор: Sriram K M K•
Oct 31, 2016
Most of the concepts and explanations were good but the assignments could be better organized. I wasn't sure what I was doing for a while, and the test cases don't cover the code in a way that progresses naturally. Some parts of it can't be tested until most of the code is written, and then major portions of the code isn't even tested until it's submitted. It would be great if the tests progressed along with the code and people didn't have to guess at the correct solution but just knew it was right when they got it.
автор: Carlos C B C N•
Apr 06, 2017
The course is good but is not focused on scala features. It is more generic parallel programming approach.
автор: Evaldas M•
Oct 29, 2016
The course was ok, but at times too much theoretical when it comes to proofs of some methods are working as expected. I think its good to know the principles of parallelizing application and changing the potential algorithms, but this has applicability only in specific fields like comlex computations that need to be highly parallelized and less likely you would use these principles in standard backend development
автор: Brad H•
Dec 04, 2017
There was some really nice material covered in this course. For me, this was the best one so far in the series. The instructors presented clear and understandable lectures. The week #4 programming task was a bit harder for me, but only because I kept forgetting to think simple and reflect on what had been covered in the course. Once I stepped away and came back everything fell into place.
автор: Nikogosov D•
Jul 03, 2017
Too difficult, especially the last week, especially for person without strong math background. I felt that material from the two last weeks is important and necessary to grasp PP, but speed should be slower.
I think the best way to improve this course would be splitting 3 and 4 weeks to obtain 6 weeks course like the first one in the specialization.
автор: Atsuya K•
Feb 09, 2018
Good topics and assignments. Wasn't as impressed by the course as the ones taught by Odersky.
автор: Alexey P•
Sep 13, 2019
It would be great to have some tests for understanding algorithms (like in algorithms course), not only practice programming assignments. Assignments are really interesting but can't verify your understand material or not. Also it is possible to pass assignment event if you have mistakes in the code.
автор: Shi Y•
Sep 13, 2019
Some instruction is pretty confusing
Nov 23, 2018
exercise are too heavy
автор: Shad A•
Apr 02, 2017
This course could have been better in my opinion, if we could have exercise that would deal with the concepts in more detail. I felt myself involved deeply in understanding the problem statement, rather than practicing the concepts explained in the course.
автор: Cedric D B•
Aug 08, 2017
Good but too theoretical and not very didactic.
автор: Federico L•
Aug 05, 2017
Good content. Very basic overview of parallel programming algorithms and data structures in scala. Course feel a little bit hacked together although not as bad as the Functional Program Design one.
Course should be more in depth.
автор: masaaki f•
Mar 31, 2017
Online video is OK. But assignments are not much related to parallel programming specific issues. One case, this is my opinion but it's nice if students learn how scala solves "The dining philosophers" issue.
автор: Igor M•
Oct 24, 2017
There are not clear test errors, that points to another place in code where mistake is placed.
автор: Igor C•
Sep 29, 2016
The course if good, but i believe the content should be more didactic.
автор: Joseph K•
Jul 31, 2017
Lectures are not easy to understand. It almost feels like they plucked various sections from a longer course.
автор: Valerio M•
Nov 27, 2016
Interesting course, but far too short. It ends up giving a quick introduction to some of the aspects of parallel programming. I enjoyed the assignments, apart from last one where the difficulty was more about the context of the example than any parallel programming aspects. That example, extended, could be a good capstone project, but I think it was not appropriate as a course assignment. I prefer courses that follow a book, and this course didn't.