1 авг. 2019 г.
It was a fabulous journey, and brought me so much nearer to the great minds of the 18th and especially the 19th century, reading original texts, and listening to Prof Roth's wonderful interpretations.
7 янв. 2016 г.
One of the best professors i've ever come across! If the teacher is so passionate about the subject material as well as conveying the ideas, the course will be excellent. This is one of those courses.
автор: Pat M•
1 окт. 2015 г.
Very interesting lectures. I found this to be a very good learning opportunity. The professor has a very good grasp of his topic.
автор: Tobias G•
12 окт. 2015 г.
The presentation of Kant's philosophy is quite inaccurate. All in all, though, this is a great course!
автор: SANJIV M•
9 сент. 2020 г.
One of the amazing tutor I came across, was totally immersed by the lectures.
автор: Gloria J M•
31 авг. 2020 г.
Excellent content and lectures. Expectations for writing assignments unclear.
автор: Douglas B•
24 февр. 2021 г.
The peers review assignments were challenging. Be warned....
автор: Uttam S•
17 мая 2017 г.
Great course! Writing assignments were really helpful.
автор: Warren C•
25 янв. 2019 г.
Fascinating overview of what 'Modern' might mean.
автор: Richard B•
4 сент. 2015 г.
though the flow of ideologies eventually became distinguishable, the comments on the several artists and philosophers noted were woefully uninformed and inadequate, even distorted, and the professor's eventual humming and hawing, irritating in the extreme, suggested that he was not at all prepared for his lectures - the final presentation of paintings without commentary at all was thus both a relief from his indecision and, at all of twenty minutes, an outrageous waste of time having left all of these however masterful works without any appreciable context
автор: Alexandra B•
13 янв. 2022 г.
The course itself is excellent. But the organization of checking assignments is HORRIBLE. I handed in all the assignments on time and paid the money for the course. My final essay has not yet been reviewed and I have not been issued a course completion certificate. I ask to check my work and give me a certificate or refund my money for the course. https://www.coursera.org/learn/modern-postmodern-1/peer/U8MRp/third-writing-assignment/review/pmaVs3HbEeygEQ7VPP1a4Q
автор: Adrià T•
3 сент. 2020 г.
The classes are very interesting, as are the readings. However, the same cannot be said of the methodology regarding the exercises. First of all, the absence of the teacher, replaced by correction between classmates - some of whom are unsympathetic - leaves much to be desired. Secondly, the third exercise is incoherent with the topics raised, seeming to want to make easy money rather than educate in teaching quality.
автор: İLKİN B•
20 окт. 2015 г.
On scientific and philosophical reflections there are unbalanced focusing and biased approach to Enlightenment tradition of thoughts and Utilitarions views in particular, on the very contrary to what Prof. Shapiro explains in his MOOC "Moral Foundations of Politics".
7 мая 2020 г.
автор: Andressa C M d S•
14 сент. 2015 г.
It's a little annoying, because the videos are the same all the time... but the professor is very good, he knows so much about filosofy!
автор: Glenn O•
22 июня 2016 г.
Only average. Much is said, little information delivered.
автор: Deleted A•
1 мар. 2016 г.
Interesting start to week 1, looking forward to week 2.
автор: Rayser R•
30 сент. 2020 г.
The course is the equivalent of a first year survey course. However, I have two honours degrees from Canadian universities and a community college diploma and have taught for many years. In all of my educational experience I have rarely come across a professor who is as difficult to listen to or attend to than Professor Roth. He has the mannerisms of a nervous man who is thinking well ahead of what he is saying and is making up his points as he goes. He stammers perpetually and many of his sentences contain numerous repetitions and often end without completing a thought. I tried to read the transcripts of the videos instead to spare myself the aggravation of listening to him, but the transcripts are a hopeless shamble of typos, misspellings, and nonsense. Here is an example of what I mean. "Morality is an expression of power. And in the first essay of the Genealogy of Morals, which is an account of, of, of morality, you've only been assigned the second essay. In the first essay, he says, it, it, he does say that morality is an expression power but is really perverse in the west." Here is another example: “You, because society's the ultimate creditor. And a strong society is a society that can say, you know, forget about it. You know? You, you, you did something really bad, you're at Wesleyan, you get 2 points. [laugh] 4 points now, right? You just[UNKNOWN] points.”
In short the course is moderately informative and interesting but destroyed by the presentation.
автор: Sang Y D•
25 мар. 2016 г.
I advice NOT to take this course.
Why: the professor is never there to read your assignments. He leaves that totally to other students like yourself, to grade your written assignments, and, they do not read and give you a RANDOM grade in 2 seconds.
Don't take it, you will waste sooo much time on this one.
автор: Michael N R•
13 июня 2016 г.
Not as advertized and way too much peer rating stuff--we do all the work the instructor does little or none--too much peer raqting stuff which I despise. And there seems to be no way to un-enroll.
автор: Paul M•
20 апр. 2017 г.
Only one star as it was not made clear you could also get 1/5 points in assignments noted as ties but no further explanation. I don't think I will bother with part 2
автор: Deleted A•
8 авг. 2020 г.