Отзывы учащихся о курсе Agile Meets Design Thinking от партнера Виргинский университет

I felt that the course material was good. I like that you can save slides as notes for reference later.. the peer reviewing of the assignment is a bit of a joke though. I didn't get a lot of feedback. In fact, the comments were so lazy. When reviewing others work, I saw the caliber of work varied and it wasn't really clear to me if I was meeting expectations or surpassing.

The course seemed very good to me, I learned a lot and appropriated enough knowledge that I already had on agile frameworks. I give it a rating of 3 because the last task was a headache: I had no clear instructions, all the tasks I reviewed had different things. I strongly recommend that you review the instruction of this peer review and correct it.

More practical examples would have made this course more appealing to me. HVAC in a Hurry I thought was a very complicated example for general students. It could have been a lot easier if provided with an easier example. Overall, good experience but not great :(

Developing personas part of the course was very helpful. There was a ton of material in the course, and can't help but think it could be streamlined.

While the content and the curriculum of the course is ok, the course is not moderated enough in terms of answering the questions the participants have

The course is fine, but it rarely ventures outside the theoretical parts, the presentation of the course felt a bit boring, to be honest,

I think videos can be significantly reduce. I mean, there's a lot of talking with no value. But some stuff is useful

Examples could have been improvised and to be straight few of the videos were not interesting. Rest was good thanks.

Good course foe the first part of a project management. I find the "deign thinking" part needs improvement.

I take effort to understand the and keep in track with the instructor, but it's a good content

the course for product management from Darden was so much better

There could be more content included and tested.

just an introduction

Underway

no

The delivery is a little dry and there's clearly been some editing and rearranging of content. More than once, the instructor refers "back" to material that has not yet been presented. It's confusing and I ended up wasting time reviewing content because I thought I had missed it. Instead, it was just missing. or got a presenter much later in the course. There's a lot of repetition of concepts that seems pointless and the interviews don't really add to the understanding of the key points. The instructor also keeps referring to there being 5 courses in this specialty when there are 4.

Poor instruction methods. The faculty lacks teaching and pedagogical skills. Sorry

too slow, assignments are irrelevant.

I need to unenroll the course

the evaluation is a shit.