The course is very good.\n\nThe classes are well taught and show general concepts. It is necessary to do research on the internet, to solve the assignments. This is not a bad thing in my point of view
I think this is very good course of aerial robotics research. Being a student of robotics, I feel that some of stuffs in this course needs a good background in control and mechanical engineering.
автор: Nicole A•
The program doesn't provide enough information for the quizzes or exercises; it is incomplete, in my opinion.
It could be better if there was more information provided (context). If you are not already an engineer, this program is going to be very difficult.
автор: Charan T•
not too bad but also not an impressive course. things was given as a fact while not answering the more important questions why ? and how ? . supplementary material for basic stuff were given but for the higher level ones , there is no clear intuition.
автор: Masahiro S•
I'm sorry, but I felt the week 4 assignment materials is not consistent to lesson videos or the lesson video does not explained enough.
I think that making students think does not mean making explanation indistinct.
автор: Sibtain M H•
This course is not a beginner level course rather it is an intermediate one. I had to put in more than 10 hours a week to complete this course. A basic knowledge of control theory is a must.
автор: Yukti S•
Assignments for week 3 and 4 were very tough and a little guidance was provided on how to do the coding part. But since I'm interested in the course i'm re-enrolling to complete it this time.
автор: Ziming W•
Interesting course. But definitely not for beginners. With a designer background, I could never accomplish this course. I really hope Penn could offer course in such topic for beginners!
автор: J. D•
Quizzes and Assignments are poorly designed. You will spend most of your time tuning parameters
and deriving matrices that were never discussed in the course. Unfortunate.
автор: Don Z•
This is not a beginner course in my opinion and it is taking 3 to 4 times longer that the advertised time per week. I'll be dropping it.
автор: Anand R•
Assignments should be much more clear in terms of what is expected from the students and how to approach the problem.
автор: Jaroslava S•
It's an interesting topic. However, the course materials are not very helpful for the quizzes, unfortunately :(
автор: Iris Y•
There are times that the course jumps from one topic to another, its confusing. Please stop doing that.
автор: Juan A G•
iba bien hasta que empezó a pedir videos y grabaciones....
автор: José J H R•
Just PID in MATLAB and not very well explained.
автор: Pranjul C•
The course is awesome, but not for beginners
автор: QUIJOUX F•
Les thèmes abordés par le cours sot très intéressants, malheureusement le cours manque de structure. La difficulté n'est pas progressive et les exercices en ligne demandent une patience infini (solutions totalement empiriques, essai-erreur jusqu'à obtenir une valeur satisfaisante pour résoudre la solution). Il n'y a peu ou pas de soutien en ligne de la part de l'équipe ce qui fait que beaucoup d'élèves se retrouvent bloqués au dernier devoir. Une sensation de ne pas avoir appris grand chose à la fin de ce premier cours de robotique.
The topics of this course are really interesting but it has no internal consistency. The difficulty is not progressive and the online assignements require an infinite patience (the solutions are totally empirical and require multiple try & retry with the very slow simulation). There is more or less no online support from the team (thanks to the community) what leads to a big impediment for lots of students at the last assignment (cf. the discussion). Still have the feeling I did not learn much at the end of this first course on robotics.
автор: James L•
This course was not a beginning level course as advertised.
Test cases for assignments were neither document nor otherwise explained within the course materials. Quizzes during the lecture were often unrelated to the material just presented or were given before the relevant material was taught.
The course creators obviously put a lot of time and effort into this course. So it is difficult for me to write such a critical review. However, they missed the mark with this one enough that I can't recommend the course.
Unfortunately I will not be completing this course only due to the fact that I have run out of time and patience to complete the last assignment.
автор: NIKOLAOS K•
Poor structure, pointlessly difficult tests, (you will have to type 100s of 5 digit numbers by hand into matlab, try to randomly guess some coefficients) and most importantly, the course is about automation in general. No specialization at all, this is something that is taught at the first or second year of any technical university.
Moreover, passing the assignments does not teach you anything about drones or robotics, just trying to reverse engineer how the grading code works. I passed the last one with 79/80, but my code was not actually flying the virtual drone
автор: Ran J•
The quiz and assignment are poorly designed. Important issues are overlooked or just briefly discussed in lecture. The assignment focuses on matlab coding, which only emphasizes the coding technique. Do not recommend to audience with
автор: Siddhesh R•
Definitely not for beginners. I had to study Linear algebra, 3D mechanics first to understand this. Quiz questions are okay but programming assignments are too tough for people who are using matlab for first time.
автор: Yafei H•
The videos doesn't tell anything related to the test. How can I know the answers? Am I going to search them on the internet? Then what the meaning to learn this course?
автор: Keith C•
Homeworks do not fully represent what's covered in class, and the lecturer fails to go into nearly as much depth as required to cover the actual subject matter.
автор: David C•
Very poor. Assignments consist of transcription of formulae given in lectures, and then manually searching the parameter space for solutions.
автор: Surve U R E•
Very bad course from basics coverage. New concepts are introduced haphazardly without giving context and very bad teaching method.
автор: David S•
Advertised as an easy course, week 1 is simple but quickly becomes far too difficult by week 2... Too late for your refund.
автор: Francesco B•
since there is a lot of math involved, there should be some carefully written readings. (not only slides or phd thesis)