While the information from this course was awesome I would've liked some hand on projects to get the information running. Nonetheless, the two simulation task were the best (more would've been neat!).
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
автор: Matías L M•
Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(
автор: kedar p•
This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.
автор: Viliam R•
i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.
автор: Vishal K•
The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.
автор: Benoit D•
I have been working in industry for 5 years now and this are not really the problems we encounter in practice.
автор: Mads E H•
Not applicable enough. I think you need more tooling around DL before these meta lectures makes sense.
автор: Dafydd S•
Had the feeling of a "filler" course although it was interesting to hear about the various challenges
автор: Alexander V•
A lot of very common-place suggestions that could just as easily be conveyed in a third of the time.
автор: Nahuel S R•
Demasiado contenido teórico sin aplicaciones prácticas reales que permitan consolidar lo aprendido
автор: Peter E•
Too theoretical. It would be good to have some practical (programming) assignments here as well.
автор: Mohamed E•
Not much to learn in this course, basic recommendations can be condensed in one or two lectures
автор: Jordi T A•
A lot of the content seemed redundant both within the lectures and with the previous courses
автор: Clement K•
Interesting but redundant. It's not worth an entire course, even if it's only two weeks
автор: Péter D•
long videos saying actually very little ... disappointment
автор: Andrey L•
Quite boring and not so interactive like the first course
автор: harsh s•
good but more theoretical course rather than pratical
автор: Kaarthik S•
this is the boring course in the specialization
автор: Thomas A•
Can be better, but there's way too much fluff
автор: Till R•
Some things are best learned from experience.
автор: Subhadeep R•
Frankly I didn't find this to be very useful.
автор: Hernan F D•
There is no a lot of content in this course
автор: Aloys N•
Missing a bit of practical Python exercises
автор: Ofer G•
Pretty basic and not enough practical
автор: 2k19ec173 s•
please work on the audio quality
автор: Agniteja M•
Useful only for beginners