I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
автор: John H•
Poor video editing. Not enough graded material to feel confident that I fully understand the concepts proposed in the lectures. Definite step backwards from courses 1-2.
автор: Aayush S•
Could be better in terms of the concept taught. A course I would prefer as the last one in the specialization. Week 2 Material is good but whole course is too slow.
автор: Mikael B•
This course had a much less ambitious scope than the previous two courses and I think that the programming assignments are very important to help me learn properly.
автор: Artem M•
Too much information in too little time. Additionally, all information is mostly practical, and having no real exercises makes it hard to remember all the details.
автор: Haim K•
The course should be much shorter (e.g. half a week). The messages are pretty straightforward and could have been passed in one quarter of the time.
автор: Iscru-Togan C T•
The videos are to long and it presents some topics purely hipothetical. You basically spend a couple of hours without developing any useful skill
I still feel a little confused when I have so many options to improve my NN. This course is less clearly taught than the two former to this one!
автор: Saad K•
I found it quite verbose... Could have easily been shrunk and fit inside the other course... Don't think it needs a separate course for this
автор: Matías L M•
Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(
автор: Kedar A P•
This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.
автор: Viliam R•
i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.
автор: Vishal K•
The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.
автор: Benoit D•
I have been working in industry for 5 years now and this are not really the problems we encounter in practice.
автор: Mads E H•
Not applicable enough. I think you need more tooling around DL before these meta lectures makes sense.
автор: Dafydd S•
Had the feeling of a "filler" course although it was interesting to hear about the various challenges
автор: Alexander V•
A lot of very common-place suggestions that could just as easily be conveyed in a third of the time.
автор: Nahuel S R•
Demasiado contenido teórico sin aplicaciones prácticas reales que permitan consolidar lo aprendido
автор: Peter E•
Too theoretical. It would be good to have some practical (programming) assignments here as well.
автор: Mohamed E•
Not much to learn in this course, basic recommendations can be condensed in one or two lectures
автор: Jordi T A•
A lot of the content seemed redundant both within the lectures and with the previous courses
автор: Clement K•
Interesting but redundant. It's not worth an entire course, even if it's only two weeks
автор: Péter D•
long videos saying actually very little ... disappointment
автор: Andrey L•
Quite boring and not so interactive like the first course
автор: harsh s•
good but more theoretical course rather than pratical
автор: Kaarthik S•
this is the boring course in the specialization