Intellectual Humility: Practice
от партнера
Intellectual Humility: Practice
The University of Edinburgh
Об этом курсе
4.6
48 ratings
We live in a polarised world where all too often people talk past each other. But do you know when to believe what others say? For example, how quick should we be to accept something that someone else tells us is true, and what should we be looking out for when assessing a person's trustworthiness? Meanwhile, what should we do when we encounter disagreements with people who seem to be our equals? How and when should we adjust our beliefs, and how does the appropriate response vary depending on the evidence? These challenges may be especially important in the arena of religious disagreements. How should we weigh the evidence for and against various theistic and atheistic stances?
Experts in psychology, philosophy, theology and education are conducting exciting new research on these questions, and the results have important, real-world applications. Faced with difficult questions people often tend to dismiss and marginalize dissent. Political and moral disagreements can be incredibly polarizing, and sometimes even dangerous. And whether it’s Christian fundamentalism, Islamic extremism, or militant atheism, religious dialogue remains tinted by arrogance, dogma, and ignorance. The world needs more people who are sensitive to reasons both for and against their beliefs, and are willing to consider the possibility that their political, religious and moral beliefs might be mistaken. The world needs more intellectual humility.
In this course. we will examine the following major questions about applied issues surrounding intellectual humility:
• Should you believe what people say?
• How should we handle disagreement?
• What is the role of evidence in resolving religious disagreements?
All lectures are delivered by leading specialists, and the course is organised around a number of interesting readings and practical assignments which will help you address issues related to humility in your daily life.
This course can be taken as a part of a series which explores the theory, the science and the applied issues surrounding intellectual humility. Before, we considered how to define and measure intellectual humility, what intellectual virtue is, whether we are born or can become humble, and what cognition and emotions can tell us about intellectual humility. If you are interested, complete all three courses to gain a broader understanding of this fascinating topic. Look for:
• Intellectual Humility: Theory - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-theory
• Intellectual Humility: Science - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-science
Check out our trailer to hear more - https://youtu.be/x_CWjrYxKZU.
Программа курса: что вы изучите
1
Раздел
GETTING STARTED
1 видео (всего 1 мин.), 3 материалов для самостоятельного изучения
1 видео
3 материала для самостоятельного изучения
About this course5мин
Course assessments and exercises5мин
Optional companion book5мин
SHOULD YOU BELIEVE WHAT PEOPLE SAY?
Professor Peter Graham points out that a great deal of what we know, we know because other people told us. But can we always believe them? Should we be trusting, or sceptical? The truth lies somewhere in the middle. This lecture will offer you some guidelines on how to find it, and on how to avoid the pitfalls created by our fears, biases, and over-confidence.
8 видео (всего 51 мин.), 8 материалов для самостоятельного изучения, 6 тестов
8 видео
Introduction to testimony4мин
Trust and scepticism6мин
The evolutionary background of trust11мин
Reconciling testimony with what we already believe3мин
The right, the wrong, and the humble6мин
Humility, fear and bias10мин
Humility and confidence6мин
8 материала для самостоятельного изучения
Before you begin...10мин
"Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10мин
Jennifer Saul on Implicit Bias (recommended podcast)3мин
Daniel Kahneman on Bias (recommended)5мин
"Social Knowledge and Social Norms" by Peter Graham (further reading)15мин
"Knowledge, Assertion and Humility" by Emma C. Gordon and J. Adam Carter (further reading)10мин
Miranda Fricker on Epistemic Injustice (further podcast)10мин
"On Testimony and Transmission" by J. Adam Carter and Philip J. Nickel (further reading)10мин
6 практического упражнения
Initial thoughts2мин
Practice Quiz6мин
Feels good to be right?10мин
Your examples of fears and biases15мин
Module quiz20мин
Reading quiz on "Can You Believe What You Hear?" by Ian Church and Peter Samuelson6мин
2
Раздел
HOW SHOULD WE HANDLE DISAGREEMENT?
Resolving disagreements may seem easy when one person clearly knows more about the topic of disagreement than the other. But what about cases where both parties are equally knowledgable and capable - in other words, when they are intellectual equals? Professor Catherine Elgin discusses various strategies we can adopt, and helps us understand how people who have the same evidence and reasoning ability can still disagree.
4 видео (всего 29 мин.), 7 материалов для самостоятельного изучения, 7 тестов
4 видео
Introduction to disagreement5мин
Disagreement between equals10мин
Dimensions of reasonable disagreement11мин
7 материала для самостоятельного изучения
"How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10мин
"The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement" by Thomas Kelly (recommended)15мин
"Reasonable Disagreement" by Catherine Elgin (further reading)10мин
"The Epistemology of Testimony" by Duncan Pritchard (further reading)10мин
"Philosophical Peer Disagreement" by Nicolás Lo Guercio (further reading)10мин
"The Epistemology of Disagreement" (video discussion between Roy Sorensen and David Christensen).5мин
"Intellectual Humility, Knowledge-How and Disagreement" by Duncan Pritchard and J. Adam Carter (further reading)10мин
7 практического упражнения
Your initial thoughts10мин
Practice Quiz4мин
Back to last week5мин
The disagreements you know15мин
The dimensions in your example10мин
Module quiz16мин
Reading quiz on "How Should We Handle Disagreement?" by Ian Church and Peter Samuelson6мин
3
Раздел
RESOLVING RELIGIOUS DISAGEEMENTS: THE ROLE OF EVIDENCE
Dr Katherine Dormandy explains why religious disagreements are so often particularly hard to resolve. Distinguishing between two types of evidence one can have in religious discussions - public and private - she evaluates three Evidence Weighting Policies we can use in determining how to approach others when talking about religion.
8 видео (всего 45 мин.), 5 материалов для самостоятельного изучения, 6 тестов
8 видео
Introduction5мин
Biases and evidence-weighting9мин
Three evidence-weighting policies5мин
Assessing privatism6мин
Assessing publicism4мин
Assessing egalitarianism4мин
Improving egalitarianism9мин
5 материала для самостоятельного изучения
"What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson (recommended)10мин
"Faith and Reason" by Duncan Pritchard (recommended reading or viewing)10мин
"Two Concepts of Intellectual Humility" by Jason Baehr (further viewing)5мин
"Can There Be Religious Disagreement Between Epistemic Peers?" by Jennifer Lackey (further viewing)3мин
"Scepticism and Implicit Bias" by Jennifer Saul (further reading)10мин
6 практического упражнения
Initial thoughts2мин
Good disagreement10мин
Practice Quiz6мин
Evidence weighting in disagreement20мин
Module Quiz20мин
Reading quiz on "What Does Intellectual Humility Tell Us About Religion?" by Ian Church & Peter Samuelson6мин
4
Раздел
END OF COURSE ASSIGNMENTS
5 материалов для самостоятельного изучения, 1 тест
5 материала для самостоятельного изучения
Before you finish...5мин
Show what you learned by editing the Wikipedia entry on intellectual humility!30мин
A brief How-To10мин
TRAILER: Intellectual Humility: Theory5мин
TRAILER: Intellectual Humility: Science5мин
4.6
Лучшие рецензии
автор: MP•Dec 12th 2017
Informative, well structured, and clearly presented material.
автор: DB•Dec 28th 2017
Excellent and straightforward. Meaty and digestible.
Преподавателя
Dr. Ian Church
ResearcherEpistemology; Philosophy of Psychology; Philosophy of Religion
Professor Duncan Pritchard
Professor of PhilosophyUniversity of Edinburgh
Dr. Emma Gordon
Postdoctoral ResearcherUniversity of Edinburgh
О The University of Edinburgh
Influencing the world since 1583, The University of Edinburgh is consistently ranked as one of the world's top 50 universities. Today, we are an established and global leader in online learning, providing degree-level education to 3,000 online students in addition to 36,000 students on-campus. We also offer a wide range of free online courses in a variety of subjects. To find out more about studying for one of our online degrees, search for ‘Edinburgh online’ or visit www.ed.ac.uk/studying/online-learning/postgraduate
Часто задаваемые вопросы
When will I have access to the lectures and assignments?
Once you enroll for a Certificate, you’ll have access to all videos, quizzes, and programming assignments (if applicable). Peer review assignments can only be submitted and reviewed once your session has begun. If you choose to explore the course without purchasing, you may not be able to access certain assignments.
What will I get if I purchase the Certificate?
When you purchase a Certificate you get access to all course materials, including graded assignments. Upon completing the course, your electronic Certificate will be added to your Accomplishments page - from there, you can print your Certificate or add it to your LinkedIn profile. If you only want to read and view the course content, you can audit the course for free.
What is the refund policy?
Is financial aid available?
Остались вопросы? Посетите Центр поддержки учащихся.
Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.
© Coursera Inc., 2018 Все права защищены.
