Great Course Overall\n\nOne thing is that some videos are not edited properly so Andrew repeats the same thing, again and again, other than that great and simple explanation of such complicated tasks.
Great course for kickoff into the world of CNN's. Gives a nice overview of existing architectures and certain applications of CNN's as well as giving some solid background in how they work internally.
автор: Oswaldo B F•
Programming assignments did not deal directly with the CNN models, but with auxiliary functions. Hacking the grader was more important than getting the right answer. Videos should have been better edited too.
автор: Vihar K•
Lectures are awesome, really inspiring and intuitive.Trouble with submitting assignments. I've solved the given question and resubmitted for almost six times, but the kernels showing up errors.
автор: Carlos E L•
Horrible user experience with the "Jupyter Hub" constant issues that makes trying to do the exams an absolute nightmare and a perfect anxiety booster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
автор: Dario d J B U•
In some tasks the delivery format is arbitrary and does not specify well what is wanted, that is, so the numerical value requested is good, the output is incorrect. due to format issues.
автор: Aman B•
Programming part was not explained well. I guess programming syntax and flow of code should be explained too instead of just telling theory or focusing mainly on theory.
автор: Daryl V D•
TOO MANY BUGS IN THE EXERCISES.It was a dis-incentive. Really.And I love me some deeplearning.ai! It has been great. The videos and content structure are fantastic.
автор: Arsh P•
Though the videos were very good but the assignments require too much from us and also there are few mistakes in week 3 and 4 notebooks which take a lot of time.
автор: Yongseon L•
автор: mike v•
The content is excellent, but there were technical problems with the final homework assignment that were not addressed by staff in a timely manner.
автор: Sébastien C•
Content was interestind and provided good theoretical overview. Exercices where you just have to fill in some line of codes are not usefull.
автор: Joshua S•
Some of the code was incorrect and the guidance was often confusing. Visibly worse than the other courses in the specialization,
автор: Kristoffer M•
Don't feel like I understand these models much better than before. Still don't see the logic of the identity layers
автор: Prasenjit D•
Lots of problem with the grader. Wasted a lot of time grappling with grader issues. Very disappointed.
автор: Sandeep K C•
The quality of some of the graders e.g. IOU is poor. One cannot make out what exactly is it checking
автор: Igor M•
Disappointed by the quality of notebooks, which often disconnect and lose all the code you wrote.
автор: Shuhe W•
The course assignment parts have many errors, I have to fix it myself. That's silly.
автор: Bernard F•
Good content, but quite a bit of technical work is needed to present this better.
автор: Ryan B•
for goodness sake "your didn't pass the test" isn't feedback for notebook grades
автор: Coral M R•
Dificultades en la hoja de tareas de Face Recognition que deberían solucionar
автор: Jason K•
The content was good, as usual, but week 4's quiz was pretty buggy.
автор: Mike B•
Good course but lots of technical issues with the assignments.
The notebooks were too simple. And the grader was not working.
автор: Stéphane P•
Videos are good, but exercises are really confusing
автор: chao z•
content good, but assignment is in poor quality
The structure of the assignments is not good