Chevron Left
Вернуться к Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment от партнера Университет штата Нью-Йорк в Баффало

4.7
звезд
Оценки: 213
Рецензии: 63

О курсе

As robots evolve and increasingly interact with humans, enhancing the safety of personnel working with these “collaborative robots” (cobots) is vital. This course equips you to assess the safety of a collaborative robot workcell and prevent the chances of injury or harm. It imparts industry-endorsed safety standards, technical report recommendations and best practices from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Learners are introduced to similarities and differences between traditional robots, cobots and conventional machinery before delving into risk assessments, causes of robot accidents and collaborative applications. Material also includes key design techniques for reducing collision forces and a methodology for safety testing. Main concepts are delivered through videos, demos and hands-on exercises. To learn more, please watch the overview video by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NU710WjM0....

Лучшие рецензии

MK
10 нояб. 2020 г.

excellent course , and this course really enhance my knowledge and give me new area for deeply study of cobots . I thank full to all professors and his team . regards

VP
11 июня 2020 г.

It was an excellent knowledge gathering exercise. The course was well structured and there is good level of guidance for learning and implementation in the course.

Фильтр по:

51–63 из 63 отзывов о курсе Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment

автор: David M

9 авг. 2019 г.

This course provides an excellent presentation of useful information and methods.

автор: Kedar P

3 мая 2020 г.

Please Provide more Visual notes and points like a slide show while speaking.

автор: Muslim A

24 июня 2020 г.

Great Course and meet industry standards

автор: chanakya j

27 мая 2020 г.

very good and useful content

автор: siddharth a m R

29 апр. 2020 г.

good course

автор: Faisal A D A

9 окт. 2021 г.

helpful

автор: CHANDRASHEKAR G V

7 мая 2020 г.

GOOD

автор: Don W

30 апр. 2020 г.

This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.

автор: Ankit S

30 мая 2020 г.

The course was okay.

The instructor was good.

though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.

автор: Arun U

4 авг. 2021 г.

Great learning objectives. But poor delivery. Most of the referred articles are heavily paid articles or unavailable. The resources are not reviewed over years. Speakers are monotonous.

автор: SARAANSH S

20 апр. 2021 г.

Basic course for developing your knowledge about collaborative robots. Hazards related to it and some mitigation methods.

автор: M.R N D

16 сент. 2020 г.

Good course

автор: Jessica N

17 февр. 2020 г.

The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.