Chevron Left
Вернуться к Divide and Conquer, Sorting and Searching, and Randomized Algorithms

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Divide and Conquer, Sorting and Searching, and Randomized Algorithms от партнера Стэнфордский университет

4.8
звезд
Оценки: 4,580
Рецензии: 893

О курсе

The primary topics in this part of the specialization are: asymptotic ("Big-oh") notation, sorting and searching, divide and conquer (master method, integer and matrix multiplication, closest pair), and randomized algorithms (QuickSort, contraction algorithm for min cuts)....

Лучшие рецензии

KS
13 сент. 2018 г.

Well researched. Topics covered well, with walkthrough for exam.le cases for each new introduced algorithm. Great experience, learned a lot of important algorithms and algorithmic thinking practices.

DT
26 мая 2020 г.

Thank you for teaching me this course. I learned a lot of new things, including Divide-and-Conquer, MergeSort, QuickSort, and Randomization Algorithms, along with proof for their asymptotic runtime

Фильтр по:

851–874 из 874 отзывов о курсе Divide and Conquer, Sorting and Searching, and Randomized Algorithms

автор: Riqiang W

17 янв. 2018 г.

This is not very beginner-friendly course, and what made it worse is that all the videos are out of sync (I don't know why this problem has not been addressed for 5 years), and the instructor's speaking manner is not easy to follow for a foreigner. Also a lot of the subtitles are just wrong. Otherwise a great course, if you keep on it you can learn a lot.

автор: 伊洛

23 дек. 2017 г.

I do believe that feedbacks are very important during the learning section. Without feedbacks I would not understand whether I am doing ok or not. The Quiz and Homework would not handout the answer key and explanation after I have done. How am I suppose to be successful with the class if I don't understand which part I should strengthen.

автор: Sheng B

28 янв. 2019 г.

This is a good course. I recommend everyone to take it. There are many details useful for you to learn. But it is not friendly. The words the professor used are not easy to follow for a non-native English, the way the exercises are designed is not reasonable. It could have been better.

автор: Mike L

9 мая 2017 г.

The professor is very good. However, pictures and graphics mean a thousand words. These lectures rely too much on words. It makes it how to visualize the concepts. Hope to see more pictures. Animation will be the best.

автор: Mohammadmahdi H

17 дек. 2020 г.

The bad handwriting of the instructor is not a trivial issue as he pretends. He also talks very fast that makes it hard for people whose native language is not English to follow.

автор: Joern K

9 авг. 2018 г.

Seems a bit dated, videos are reused from older courses and sometimes don't fit well together anymore. Content is great and lots of fun to work through.

автор: Daniel Y

7 нояб. 2020 г.

This course requires mathematical backgrounds. The professor talks super fast and sometimes he makes you asleep..

автор: Hardik A

22 дек. 2018 г.

Great course theory wise, but the programming problem is unrelated and gives too little practice

автор: David A

19 окт. 2020 г.

Audio out of sync, sometimes material climbs in difficulty without the climb in explanation imo.

автор: Neelesh K

25 апр. 2020 г.

The explanation could be better. The hand writing must be improved.

автор: Kamil K

5 окт. 2017 г.

Not practical enough, too academical approach for me.

автор: safa k

17 дек. 2020 г.

I wish the lecture videos were shorter and clearer

автор: Wai C C

22 авг. 2020 г.

Too few examples but too many verbal explanations.

автор: Yash R

23 апр. 2020 г.

The course goes too fast and it skips the basics.

автор: Nishtha

20 июня 2020 г.

i want to unenroll in this course. how to do so

автор: Mubin A

2 мар. 2020 г.

concepts explanation need to improve

автор: XiangRui L

21 дек. 2020 г.

The visualization was limited.

автор: Gangadharan V

4 июня 2017 г.

Good course

автор: Ian P

27 июня 2018 г.

He's a personable instructor, but I think there are too few examples, the course is too devoid of interesting history, and the language and assignments can be unnecessarily obtuse. I'll happily work through a challenging course, but it feels like a waste of time if most of your effort is spent translating.

автор: Ahmad K

20 дек. 2017 г.

The content is good and the instructor is good. On the other hand the fact that you cannot submit assignments or problem sets without purchasing the course is quite annoying. On all other courses which I have done without purchasing, you were able to do the full course which includes the problem sets etc.

автор: Amir A

15 июня 2020 г.

it can be better if the professor tried to learn more algorithm instead of focus deeply on them

автор: Zengjia Y

2 нояб. 2019 г.

Too theoretical, a bit too far apart from industry.

автор: Moush

25 мая 2021 г.

This course should be named VERY HIGH-LEVEL overview of algorithms. I could get a much deeper understanding by googling the terms like merge sort, bubble sort, etc., and reading blogs than from the videos of this course. The logic is not explained clearly at all, most parts are skipped that too in a condescending way as if 'that's basic if you don't even know that, God help you.' I had only about a week to prepare for my interview and I have wasted half my day in this course. I do not recommend it to anyone. I recommend Princeton's course on the same (no certificate on that one though but HUGELY better understanding) over this one. A great teacher is not the one who's super knowledgeable and is able to flash his understanding at you (while teaching you nothing) a great teacher is the one who takes you to the same level of understanding as his own by being your guide. If at all, this course may be helpful to those who already are familiar with Algorithms but are rusty and need a refresher.

автор: Shivam P

13 авг. 2020 г.

Only for geniuses