15 июня 2019 г.
Very clear and articulate explanation of the concepts. He doesn't skip a step in the sequencing ideas, drawing comparisons and differences, and illustrating both visually and story-telling. Excellent.
30 июля 2019 г.
Very nice course for beginner, the mathematic level is not high (around french baccalaureat) so available to everyone. I enjoyed a lot this course that show how simple math can be used in real life.
автор: Prannoy K•
16 февр. 2016 г.
Assignments should be evaluated for all users (unpaid ones as well) like it is done for other Wharton courses.
автор: Charles C W•
10 мая 2018 г.
Perhaps I was expecting too much given the reputation of the institution, but this is a course for beginners.
автор: Pedro B•
17 июня 2017 г.
Could come a bit deeper in more complex examples at the end of the course. Most of them were too simple.
1 февр. 2021 г.
I think this course is too easy for students with Probability and Mathematical Statistics knowledges...
автор: Yuan Z•
9 мар. 2019 г.
General description of the modeling, need further work or pre-understandings for some of the contents.
автор: Johnny V•
10 июля 2016 г.
Felt a little rudimentary until the last week. I hope the specialization picks up after this point.
автор: Michael S•
6 дек. 2017 г.
Not enough about formulas or real world application. Was hoping to see examples applied in Excel.
автор: Sidney A•
8 мая 2016 г.
Nice primer for modeling, but wish there were more workable problems to help hit the point home.
автор: Bharat J•
20 июня 2020 г.
Too descriptive for a quantitative course. Would've preferred more problem solving exercises.
автор: Eike A H•
9 сент. 2019 г.
-no explanation on errors
-too theoretical and abstract with lack of examples and own practice
автор: S B•
26 мар. 2018 г.
Could have been more advanced from the perspective of practical use-cases of data modeling.
автор: jyoti v•
23 окт. 2018 г.
The course is a bit too introductory for me. I'm looking for more challenging material.
автор: Kangkang W•
17 окт. 2016 г.
most contents are explicit on ppt, it is sometimes not necessary to view the lectures.
автор: Josh R•
17 мая 2020 г.
Lots of information, not much opportunity to apply practical usage to the theories
автор: martino g•
30 мар. 2020 г.
Content is good but the teacher is extremely boring. Had to struggle to finish it.
автор: Paul M•
7 июля 2020 г.
My name was spelled incorrectly on my certificate, how to do I correct this?
автор: Mathew L•
27 апр. 2016 г.
I would have liked the quizzes to explain why an answer was right or wrong.
автор: Brendan C•
22 мая 2018 г.
good course, quizzes should not be locked though...disappointed with that.
автор: Deleted A•
19 февр. 2018 г.
I think the contents of this course can be more difficult and challenging.
автор: Michelle l G•
9 февр. 2017 г.
It was an interesting module, however, not sure how I will apply this in
автор: Gary V•
11 июля 2017 г.
Very basic things that any person with a stats background should know
автор: Alec E•
23 июля 2020 г.
Not that enjoyable. Decent information but pretty boring to watch.
автор: Abhed M•
12 янв. 2020 г.
It should be more rigorous. I completed this course in three days.
автор: Chalal S•
8 окт. 2021 г.
The explaining is good, but the concepts in the course are basic.
автор: Dominique B•
8 апр. 2020 г.
a bit too simple, I would have expected more practical excersises