Chevron Left
Вернуться к Введение в интерактивное программирование на языке Python (Часть 1)

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Введение в интерактивное программирование на языке Python (Часть 1) от партнера Университет Райса

4.8
звезд
Оценки: 3,146
Рецензии: 921

О курсе

This two-part course is designed to help students with very little or no computing background learn the basics of building simple interactive applications. Our language of choice, Python, is an easy-to learn, high-level computer language that is used in many of the computational courses offered on Coursera. To make learning Python easy, we have developed a new browser-based programming environment that makes developing interactive applications in Python simple. These applications will involve windows whose contents are graphical and respond to buttons, the keyboard and the mouse. In part 1 of this course, we will introduce the basic elements of programming (such as expressions, conditionals, and functions) and then use these elements to create simple interactive applications such as a digital stopwatch. Part 1 of this class will culminate in building a version of the classic arcade game "Pong"....

Лучшие рецензии

VL

28 мая 2017 г.

The best python course i ever had thanks to the teachers therereally awesome, and the classes are very pleasant. if your aout there trying to start with programming, i definitely recommend this course

CD

12 июля 2017 г.

It was nice beginner course for the new programming to learn programming and practice the concepts with most intuitive way, the way is to build a game and that interests anyone who takes this course.

Фильтр по:

801–825 из 906 отзывов о курсе Введение в интерактивное программирование на языке Python (Часть 1)

автор: RAGHUVEER S D

25 июля 2020 г.

good

автор: ramavath p

25 июня 2020 г.

None

автор: salla s

23 июня 2020 г.

Good

автор: Francisco J D L R P

25 мая 2020 г.

none

автор: MS. D

18 мая 2020 г.

GOOD

автор: Dr. P S J

15 мая 2020 г.

good

автор: Rami M

15 апр. 2019 г.

GOOD

автор: Kim M C

15 нояб. 2018 г.

good

автор: Zhefan H

7 мая 2018 г.

GOOD

автор: Heidy S G V

19 окт. 2017 г.

nice

автор: Austin Z

3 авг. 2017 г.

gud

автор: 关凌云

30 мая 2017 г.

很有趣

автор: NIHAL A

31 мар. 2021 г.

Ok

автор: Gbenga O

23 янв. 2018 г.

:)

автор: Lorena D G S

28 сент. 2017 г.

(:

автор: youwei

22 нояб. 2016 г.

很棒

автор: kalla v v s s k

3 июля 2020 г.

i

автор: KWONSEMOK

13 нояб. 2018 г.

G

автор: Lin Z

9 мая 2016 г.

m

автор: Roy H

4 янв. 2017 г.

While this is a great course for introductory programming, I believe that it suffers from its focus on cokeskultpor UI design. The main issue I have with it is that these skills are not easily transferred to real world applications. I think some time spent on a basic introduction to tkinter would be good to help get people started on how to make their own programs.

I found that the grading rubrick in particular focused too much on simple UI elements and not enough on making sure that the code was good or that the game even worked. For example, I had one person who had everything in pong perfect except that the score was added when the ball hit the paddle. This meant that the game as whole did not work as expected, but it only cost him 2 marks.

автор: Deleted A

8 мая 2020 г.

Decades removed from doing much math and messing with any programming, I was looking up formulas for the early projects and struggled a little with a couple of concepts (Python is more 'loose' than I remember Pascal and Unix being). However, I was able to get all of the projects to work and took away an understanding of Python. I can look at someone else's code and identify modules, functions, function calls, global versus local variables, understand most of the syntax and a number of other things. The video presentations were good and the end result of each project was something fun. While it was a beginner level class, it was a good challenge. Expect to put some time in and do a little digging around.

автор: Gman

21 мая 2022 г.

well-structured and useful course but each week's mini project can be confusing to a certain degree – would be nicer the templates include docstrings so we can understand what each function precisely is designed for. The description video and readings explain some of the functions’ logic but not purposes.

Be warned the peer-gradings take painfully long time. At the time of writing this comment, I’m still waiting on my week 3, 4 and 5 project’s feedback. They were completed over 2 weeks ago. Do take a notice if you are on a time constrain for completing this specialization.

автор: Johannes T

28 мая 2019 г.

The course was a great introduction and also involves a high commitment. The teachers were passionate about the content and teaching. The thing which is pretty annoying for me, is the availability of tasks from other students. At the end, coursera should be a way of efficient learning. For some grading excersises, I had to revisit the pages for a week and at least 20 times. That is not acceptable and does not reflect a efficient learning experience.

автор: chris s

18 дек. 2018 г.

Overall a good course. However, it uses Python 2 verse Python 3. It uses CodeSkultper, and CodeSkulpter does not have all of the Python Modules incorporated, and in some Modules it does support not all of the commands . Another thing that I wished this course would have taught was how to use either Kivy, TKinter or PyQT for grahics since CodeSkulpter only works if you have web access

автор: Song S

17 апр. 2019 г.

It is pretty interesting, especially those mini-projects. I learned a lot from the courses. However, it is a pity that it dose not use Python3. What is worse, the courses are based on Simplegui, which can only be used on the website. This means I cannot use an IDLE or something like that to finish the mini-projects, and also it seems useless without the website.