DG
Feb 19, 2021
This was a great experience. It gave the confidence to tackle such issues as Duration of Activity Schedules and many more. Learned a lot and course content will forever be my guide on future projects.
DC
Jul 20, 2020
I thought it was a great intro coming from my Architecture background and looking forward to the other classes. I did think the information was occasionally repetitive but overall it had a great flow.
By Priyanka O
•Sep 8, 2021
Good
By Oussama B S
•Jan 1, 2022
By vishwadeep K
•Jun 16, 2020
V
By Andrea S
•Nov 6, 2020
even though the course brings a great scope on the project planning regarding construction, there is a lot of repeated and incongruent information through the multiple lessons given by different professors (such as surety bond topic, projects delivery methods, ect.). I would strongly recommend to review all the presentations and unify the concepts explained.
By Jenifer H
•Aug 31, 2020
In week 5 it did not cover enough about Estimating but yet it had you complete a quiz completely on it which is horrible. Otherwise there is are quite a bit of useful information but quite a bit of monotone speakers which makes it hard top stay engaged.
By Todor G
•Oct 6, 2019
The course was a bit too basic and some of the videos were too broad. Some had information which did not seem to contribute to the purpose of the course. Overall it is good course to listen over my free time and learn a few new things.
By Jimmy H
•Apr 12, 2020
Course was theory based. Was hoping the course would provide more real life scenarios and examples. Week 5 provided some examples and math problems on determining formwork and duration of the project. Was hoping to see more of that.
By Rick D
•Feb 9, 2017
I did not think the instructors were very engaging. For the most part they read from slide decks that were also on the screen. There should be more visuals and discussion about what it is like to work in construction management.
By Francisco P G
•Apr 22, 2020
Varios conceptos básicos y otros que no tienen aplicación en paÃses ajenos a los EEUU.
Donde me concentrarÃa? Tipos de entrega, contratos y scheduling.
Donde NO me concentrarÃa? Aspectos legales y surity bonds
By Daniel V
•May 22, 2020
A little simplistic with just lectures and quizzes. Just scratches the surface of general knowledge. If assignments were added to the course and the lectures expanded the course would offer more value.
By Quentin M
•Mar 10, 2017
Overall it's good. Depending on the customer's level of experience in construction. Some of the classes are very basic knowledge. But the structure of the course is consistent.
By amr e
•Sep 8, 2017
i think it's a good course with many specialized people every one on it's field but that what prevent the course from being great some of them don't know how to teach
By Deleted A
•Apr 17, 2022
This is so much information. I feel if the coarse was a little more interactive it would benefit me as an individual more. some of the videos just go on and on.
By Hector M
•Jun 28, 2020
The sessions sometimes were too long for a subject that really didnt needed that amountof time. For example : Planning and scheduling
By Ignacio M
•Dec 21, 2022
Lectures could be a bit more insightful. The lecturer offers little more insight than the main concepts and what is shown in slides.
By Anilyzed
•Nov 15, 2016
Good start with Fundamentals. Need to take more advanced courses to gain indepth knowledge.
By Nick S
•Nov 15, 2021
The professor Ibrahim Odeh was good, but some other presenters have not been very well.
By Bryce B
•Jan 22, 2020
This course provides very basic information, and I did not find it helpful.
By pradhuman b
•Feb 3, 2020
Should be more practical and software involved should be taught.
By C B
•Dec 27, 2021
CURRICULUM NOT APPLICABLE TO MY ROLE IN MY CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
By MAKRAM E
•Apr 14, 2022
GOOD
By Abhishek M
•Apr 7, 2022
good
By Bader e Y
•May 26, 2021
nice
By Kamalsingh A
•Jun 15, 2020
GOOD
By George A
•Sep 15, 2018
I thought the class did a good job of generally introducing the world of Construction Mgmt and I learned a lot. Using lecturers from the field made the lectures more interesting, however, it was apparent that the lecturers weren't trained in education or how to present information clearly to a class of students who are learning this material for the first time. The guest lecturers all used basic PPT presentations that weren't very engaging most of the time. I took the Construction Scheduling class simultaneously and that class was far more involved and varied in the way the information was prevented since the professor was actually an educator by trade. On top of that the homework assignment instructions differed from the rubrics we had to use to grade them, so in both cases I had to resubmit my assignment only AFTER seeing the rubric. Overall the core information was interesting, but it was presented so poorly that it made the class feel like an endless stream of trivia facts, further meaning that I might forget most of this info in the near future.