This course focuses on women’s health and human rights issues from infancy through old age, including information about positive interventions relating to those issues. Learners are encouraged to interact with each other through interactive discussions. It is important to us that this course be available to all learners. We encourage you to apply for Coursera's financial aid (see link to left) if the cost of the course certificate is difficult for you to afford. Please note that you may view all materials in this course, and participate in it, without purchasing a certificate. The course was co-created by Consulting Professor Anne Firth Murray and Kevin Hsu. Anne Firth Murray is the Content Director of the course; Kevin Hsu is the Design Director of the course.
Dr. Iman Bibars (Egypt)
Loading...
Из курса от партнера Stanford University
International Women's Health and Human Rights
182 оценки
Из урока
Choosing Priorities, Making a Difference
Познакомьтесь с преподавателями
Anne Firth Murray
Anne: I'm delighted to welcome Iman Bibars today
from Egypt and from the Ashoka Foundation to speak about the issues she is working on
and that she is most passionate about at the moment, and then we'll talk a little further
about the past and the future.
But first a brief introduction.
Iman: About myself?
Anne: Yes
Iman: My name is Iman Bibars and I'm Egyptian.
I think I am a social entrepreneur, and I have started working on women's issues for
at least 32 years in the Middle East and Africa.
I started the Ashoka Foundation branch in the Middle East around eleven years ago.
Actually, mid-March it will be eleven years ago.
Anne: You also founded a nonprofit organization?
Iman: Yea, 28 years ago I founded the first microfinance
organization in the Middle East, and, not only Egypt, I co-founded with several of my
friends.
And it was the first NGO that works with female heads of households, works on microcredit,
and works on legal assistance, and the legal existence of women in Egypt.
Anne: Looking back over the last ten years, did
that represent a kind of response to the issues that you thought were most important at that
time?
I would ask you, looking back over the last ten years, what do you think have been the
major issues and maybe even the achievements in the women's movement?
Iman: I think it is interesting because there is
contradictory stuff.
So for example, if we look at the Middle East, you will find that a lot of laws came during
the last ten years supporting women.
You know, there were many things about recognition of women's rights, for example to have nationality,
to give the nationality to their kids.
There were issues about women's place in politics, that we need more women ministers, or judges,
or in the parliament.
So the laws were there.
There was a much better framework, legal framework for women.
On one hand, there is a lot of education and educated women.
There is much more voice for women, on the women's side.
But the last ten years in the Middle East, what we noticed that this was not translated
into what men believed or what the communities believed.
After the revolution in Egypt, for example, one of the sad and strange things was that
immediately after the revolution, there were so many calls for women to go back home.
Although women were part of the revolution, and were as heard and, you know, strong as
men.
But suddenly there were voices for women to go home, to change the laws that were... that
were supporting women, which were based on religion by the way.
So this, I don't know, this dilemma or contradiction made us all in the women's movement think
"what really is going on now"?
We have the laws, we have more voices, we have stronger women, but something did not
translate into the communities, and I think that this is what we need to focus on.
Anne: And comment more about that.
Do we have theories about what is going on?
Because as you speak about this sort of "back to the home" movement—people pushing women
back into a domestic life—reminds me of what happened in South Africa where women
were actively involved in the anti-apartheid movement and in the revolutionary changes
there, and after that they were really invited back into the home rather than into public
life.
Would you comment on that?
Iman: I think, I mean again this is my own opinion,
but I think we should really start focusing on empowering women but also empowering men
to understand women.
And, you know what I always say, the patriarchal paradigm is more unfair to men than to women,
and men should recognize that.
The patriarchal paradigm is making men too responsible as if they are the only ones who
are in control, and it is really diminishing the rights of choice.
And really this is one of the things that I have been thinking of: Why are you not allowed
to stay home as a man if you want to?
Why do you think this would diminish your manhood?
So the patriarchal paradigm is as harmful to you as to us.
You are diminishing our ability to be as powerful and as a decision maker outside, but it's
also diminishing your right to think of yourself as a father or to think of yourself as a homemaker.
Anne: I've often thought that over time what a huge
burden this stereotype has been on men, of that tremendous pressure to have to bring
in all the money...
Iman: Exactly!
Anne: ...to be responsible for the survival of the
family.
It's on the one hand, a powerful position one might say, but I've often thought that
it was a huge psychological, and for that matter physical, mental, burden on men.
Iman: I totally agree with you.
I mean this is a guy who cannot retire if he wants to retire.
This is a guy who has all this responsibility on his shoulders, when, really, family and
marriage is about partnership.
So I think, our next movement should be the patriarchal paradigm's stereotype is as bad
to you as to us.
And we really have to change that.
Just as we have to change the way education is.
I mean, the world now shows that all these traditional ways of doing things have not
worked.
Nobody is happy!
The men are not happy, the women are not happy, the kids now are not as they should be change-makers,
they should be entrepreneurial.
This way of doing education as if we're still in the factory should really change.
And I think men and women together should understand that.
Anne: You've anticipated my next question, which
is: As you look forward for the next ten years, what do you think are the challenges?
And I guess I would put it this way, because you have partially answered that question:
There are these broad challenges.
But getting into a more specific level of operation, what, in practical terms do you
think we can do to carry out this kind of change in the paradigm?
Iman: I think it involves several things.
One of it is we need more women leaders.
I mean at the end of the day, we need to empower more women to be leaders, but I would say:
"Lean in, break out, and take over!
So you know, I would not just say "lean in."
I think "lean in" is important, but I also think that we have to break out.
And I believe that opposition is something and resistance is something else.
And if we want to change the system, to be better for everyone, it is not enough to subvert
and oppose, which is "lean in."
You need to break out and change.
And what I'm saying here is if we want, for example, in the social entrepreneurship world,
where Ashoka is enacting all these wonderful social, where Ashoka is electing all these
social entrepreneurs, these innovative people who are trying to change the world.
We are trying now to create this endowment fund when we elect more women, right, that
are social entrepreneurs across the globe, but also help these women be partners in the
decision making process, help these women scale their ideas to change the world, and
bring in the men to do that with us.
The Women Endowment Fund for example is to bring this fund, which will give us a lot
of freedom, to find more women social entrepreneurs, to get on board more male social entrepreneurs
who are willing to support these women to scale up.
And as I said, the challenges are that we have to recognize that we all live in this
world and it cannot be governed by one gender and not the other.
We all live in this world, whether in the business or the social sector.
We both have to understand that the challenge in the future is how we build the world together.
No longer: one gender more or the other.
And the only way to believe in that is to really work together to change the world.
To not only "lean in."
Break out and change the world.
Anne: In the work of Ashoka for example, as you
are beginning to focus on women leaders and now perhaps supporting particular women to
move up into leadership positions whether it be in government, or the corporate world
or wherever, would Ashoka also buy into that goal in the way it is supporting men?
In other words, might they begin to be, to look for men who clearly demonstrate their
commitment to a change in the paradigm, so that you, you know, you work on your goal
on both sides?
Iman: I totally agree.
I think what we are doing at Ashoka globally is to look for any social entrepreneur, because
we are looking for those people who are trying to find local solutions to local problems
in an innovative systemic change way, right.
The Women Fund will do exactly that.
The Women Fund will give us liberty, those people who believe that there is a need to
change the paradigm, is to give us liberty, to find more female leaders in the social
entrepreneurial sphere, to support some of them to scale up, and have more impact, social
impact, in their communities, but beyond.
But also to look for those men, you know, who are willing, because without the men we
will not be able to change and without the women the world will not be able to be a better
world.
And I think this is part of I would say the ideology, the vocation, the passion of the
Women Endowment Fund.
Let us together have a better world and to put it in everybody's heads, in the schools,
in the change- making schools, in the social entrepreneurs we are going to elect, in the
training or the capacity building we are going to do.
Guys and girls: without all of us working together we will not have a better world.
Anne: What advice would you give to women around
the world, many of whom may be watching this video?
What advice would you give to them, if they wanted to join, not join specifically your
program, but share the goals that you've outlined?
Iman: I would tell them the first thing; self-definition,
our own definition of ourselves is the biggest barrier we have.
We have to believe in ourselves.
I mean we have to believe that we are human beings, all of us, and that, do not hesitate
to ask, do not hesitate to ask for help, but also do not hesitate to ask for your rights.
You know, women have these problems, either they don't ask for their rights or they don't
ask for help, and it does not diminish us to ask for help.
So this is number one.
Number two: think outside the box.
You know, you have to think of how to solve problems in a way that is outside the box,
and do not be afraid to be against the current because the future is for us to think out
of the box so that we can solve the problems that nobody has been able to solve.
Have confidence in yourself, define yourself as an equal, define yourself as somebody who
is a change-maker, and empower everyone around you: empower other women, empower young people,
and empower men too, because only if we are all empowered as change-makers can we really
change the world.
Anne: Thank you so much!
Iman: Thank you!
Ознакомьтесь с нашим каталогом
Присоединяйтесь бесплатно и получайте персонализированные рекомендации, обновления и предложения.
Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.
© Coursera Inc., 2018 Все права защищены.
