Video 3-6 Distribution of subsidies in Chile and Colombia

Loading...

Из курса от партнера University of Manchester

Water Supply and Sanitation Policy in Developing Countries Part 2: Developing Effective Interventions

10 оценки

University of Manchester

Water Supply and Sanitation Policy in Developing Countries Part 2: Developing Effective Interventions

10 оценки

Water Supply and Sanitation Policy in Developing Countries Part 2 is our second MOOC in a two-part sequence, and looks at ‘Developing Effective Interventions’. Here we invite you to develop analytical skills and deep understanding about a complex, controversial policy problem – one with no simple, easy answers. About half a billion people on our planet still lack access to improved water supplies and about two billion do not have improved sanitation services, leading to an unknown but very large number of avoidable deaths each year from water-related diseases. Millions of dollars are spent on avoidable health care expenditures, and people – mostly women – spend many billions of hours carrying water from sources outside the home. Reducing these costs is a major global challenge for us all in the 21st century. Join us to explore the challenging and complex political, economic, social, and technical dimensions of the policy interventions that donors, national governments and water utilities use to address this challenge. This second MOOC consists of the following seven sessions: • Session 1: Introduction and how our ‘ancient instincts’ affect water policy interventions. • Session 2: Planning better policy interventions: Roles, features and examples of planning protocols. • Session 3: Water pricing, tariff design and subsidies. • Session 4: Providing information to households and communities to improve water and sanitation conditions. • Session 5: Changing the institutions that deliver water and sanitation services: Privatization in developing countries. • Session 6: Changing institutions: Lessons from the UK water privatization story. • Session 7: Changing institutions: Improving regulation of the water and sanitation sector. Your instructors for this course have worked in and studied this sector for many years. Professor Dale Whittington has worked on water and sanitation policy and planning issues for over 40 years in more than two dozen low and middle-income countries. Dr Duncan Thomas has worked in the UK and European water sectors for 15 years, focusing on overcoming barriers to technological, organizational, regulatory and policy innovations. Please watch this introductory video outlining the course: https://youtu.be/KkBmo3EKkkI

Из урока

Roles, features and problems of water pricing, tariff design and subsidies

Video 3-0 Introducing municipal water pricing and tariff design9:42

Video 3-1 What are the objectives of tariff design?17:37

Video 3-2 Possible types of tariff structures18:31

Video 3-3 Current tariff structures in low and middle-income countries7:40

Video 3-4 Problems with increasing block tariffs (IBTs)14:27

Video 3-5 Designing and targeting subsidies in the water and sanitation sector in LDCs11:10

Video 3-6 Distribution of subsidies in Chile and Colombia6:01

Video 3-7 Evidence on subsidy schemes in Chile and Colombia8:09

Video 3-8 Designing improved water subsidy schemes10:06

Познакомьтесь с преподавателями

Dr Duncan Thomas
Lecturer
Alliance Manchester Business School
Prof Dale Whittington
Professor
Manchester Business School

In this second video on subsidies I will describe two subsidy schemes that attempt

to target poor households.

First one word of caution.

My understanding of these two subsidies schemes is based on this paper by

Andres Gomez-Lobo and

Dante Contreras published in the World Bank Economic Review in 2003.

There may have been changes made to these scheme since then.

The Chilean Subsidy Scheme was designed to provide financial assistance to

poor households with pipe connections to help them pay their water bills.

It was started in 1990.

The target population of the program was households that were spending more than 5%

of their income on water and sanitation services.

Households who wanted assistance had to apply.

They were then interviewed in their homes by a social worker to see if they

were eligible.

The social worker asked about 50 questions to determine

if a household was sufficiently poor to receive assistance.

Assuming that the respondent answered these questions accurately, it seems to me

that the answers to these many questions, should provide the government with plenty

of information to determine the socio-economic status of the household.

The amount of subsidy each household receives is different because it depends

on it's income, the amount of water it uses, and

the terrafuse by the water utility that provides the household with service.

The subsidy works like an IBT, poor households

receive a subsidized volumetric rate up to 15 cubic meters per month.

If a poor household uses more water than that,

it must pay the full unsubsidized price.

The percent of subsidy that a household receives varies by region of the country

and it can range from 25 to 85% of the water bill.

Once a household is awarded a subsidy the water utility is notified.

Then the water utility calculates the household subsequent

monthly water bills net of the subsidy and sends the household a reduced bill.

So how does the water utility get paid the difference between

the household's original bill and the reduced bill?

Once a month the water company bills municipalities in its service area to

recover the subsidies given to beneficiary households in the last billing period.

So where does the municipality get the money to pay this monthly invoice from

the water company?

The funds for the subsidy program are included in the national budget.

Funds flow from the budget office in the Ministry of Finance to the regions.

And from the regions funds are transferred to municipalities.

And then the municipalities pay the water utilities.

These payments to the Chilean Water Utilities represent

about 6% of their revenues.

In 2004 the subsidy program was amended to provide additional assistance to

households determined to be in extreme poverty.

This change in the program triggered an increase in program beneficiaries

from about 450,000 households in 1994 to about 750,000 in 2006.

From my perspective,

there are two important features of the Chilean subsidy scheme.

First, the scheme tries to deliver subsidies

only to poor households that need them.

Not to all households through a general subsidized price.

This approach has the potential to better target available subsidies

to poor households, and to send the correct economic signal to

non-poor households about the cost of water services.

Second, the scheme takes the responsibility for the subsidies

out of the hands of the water utilities and gives it to the government.

To me this makes a lot of sense.

Water utilities can then concentrate on their core competence,

the efficient production and delivery of water and sanitation services.

Water utilities are not in the business of designing and implementing social policy.

This is not their area of expertise.

Let's now turn to our second example.

Colombia has tried a different approach called geographic targeting.

The objective is the same as the Chilean system,

to target the available subsidies to poor households, not to everyone.

In Colombia, municipalities are responsible for classifying households

into six socioeconomic categories, ranging from very poor to rich.

The National Planning Department, provided the guidelines and methodology for

doing this classification.

The classification procedure,

tried to classify geographic areas of a city that had similar housing units.

All the dwellings within this geographic area were classified in the same

socioeconomic category.

Provision was made, however, for

individual housing units to be reclassified into another group.

Individuals can request a revision of their dwelling's classification.

Of course, this is unlikely if someone has a nice house in a poor neighborhood.

The plan for the Colombian scheme was that the funds for

the subsidy would come from two sources.

First, general tax revenues, and

second, cross-subsidies from industries and high-income households.

This slide shows the tariffs paid as a proportion of the cost-recovery tariff for

15 Colombian water utilities by the socioeconomic classification of dwellings.

As shown, households in the two poorest categories, low-low and low,

pay less than half the average cost of water supply.

And only households in the highest category pay more than the average cost.

What this table does not show is how many households ended up in

each of the six socioeconomic categories.

Another important issue is whether Colombian Utility

estimated average costs accurately.

These costs may be too low, to allow cost recovery.

As we've seen in this course, estimating the full capital and

ONM costs of water and sanitation services is challenging.

How well do you think the Chilean and

Colombian subsidy schemes worked in practice?

In the next video, we will look at some empirical evidence on this question.

Ознакомьтесь с нашим каталогом

Присоединяйтесь бесплатно и получайте персонализированные рекомендации, обновления и предложения.

Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.

© Coursera Inc., 2019 Все права защищены.

Загрузить из App Store

Загрузить в Google Play