4.13. Constrained optimization.

Loading...

Из курса от партнера National Research University Higher School of Economics

Mathematics for economists

1 оценка

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Mathematics for economists

1 оценка

This course is an important part of the undergraduate stage in education for future economists. It's also useful for graduate students who would like to gain knowledge and skills in an important part of math. It gives students skills for implementation of the mathematical knowledge and expertise to the problems of economics. Its prerequisites are both the knowledge of the single variable calculus and the foundations of linear algebra including operations on matrices and the general theory of systems of simultaneous equations. Some knowledge of vector spaces would be beneficial for a student. The course covers several variable calculus, both constrained and unconstrained optimization. The course is aimed at teaching students to master comparative statics problems, optimization problems using the acquired mathematical tools. Home assignments will be provided on a weekly basis. The objective of the course is to acquire the students’ knowledge in the field of mathematics and to make them ready to analyze simulated as well as real economic situations. Students learn how to use and apply mathematics by working with concrete examples and exercises. Moreover this course is aimed at showing what constitutes a solid proof. The ability to present proofs can be trained and improved and in that respect the course is helpful. It will be shown that math is not reduced just to “cookbook recipes”. On the contrary the deep knowledge of math concepts helps to understand real life situations.

Из урока

Unconstrained and constrained optimization.

Week 4 of the Course is devoted to the problems of constrained and unconstrained optimization. Of special attention are quadratic forms, critical points and their classification.

4.1. Introduction in optimization.10:13

4.2. Global max. Local max. Saddle point.9:34

4.3. Unconstrained optimization.9:17

4.4. Critical point. Taylor's formula.12:22

4.5. Quadratic forms. Positive definiteness. Negative definiteness.7:45

4.6. Sylvester's criterion (part 1).7:17

4.7. Sylvester's criterion (part 2).5:50

4.8. Examples of Hessians (part 1).7:47

4.9. Example of Hessians (part 2).4:01

4.10. Sufficient condition for a critical point to be a local maximum, a local minimum and neither of both.7:13

4.11. Examples of finding and classification of critical points (part 1).6:34

4.12. Examples of finding and classification of critical points (part 2).4:38

4.13. Constrained optimization.9:11

4.14. Lagrangian.5:56

4.15. Example of constrained optimization problem.4:06

Познакомьтесь с преподавателями

Kirill Bukin
Associate Professor, Candidate of sciences (phys.-math.)
Faculty of Economic Sciences, Department of Theoretical Economics

Now we consider a constrained optimization problems.

I would say that the applicability of these material

concerning constrained optimization is much broader than in case or the unconstrained.

So the majority I would say 99% of all problems in economics where we need

to apply calculus they belong to this type of problems with constraints.

I'll provide examples from microeconomics for instance.

Let's suppose we have a utility maximization problem.

Then we deal with the objective function which is utility function of

a consumer and this function should be

maximized subject to the budget constraint which looks

like no greater than

the income or the consumer.

But also we include the non-negativity constraints for the variables in the form of-

or we can

choose a problem from production theory.

For example, let us assume a case over two factor production function.

This is a cost minimization problem which looks like,

we'll take the wage rate multiplied by the labor employed,

the rental rate of capital times capital.

This amount should be minimized subject

to the production function.

So the costs should be minimized but

the output should be equal to q and also non-negativity constraints for

the factors and these two examples

show us that the constraints may differ.

So the budget constraint here in utility maximization problem looks like an inequality.

Non-negativity constraints they're all inequalities.

The same true for labor capital constraints no-negativity constraints.

But the production function which provides the output in the amount of Q is equality.

So we start with

the equality constraints which are easier to consider.

And let us consider the simplest,

probably the simplest constrained optimization problem

for a function of two variables with one constraint.

We have two functions,

function f and function g

which continuous differentiable for all x and y values and we're considering.

Let's choose the maximization case to be concrete.

So let us consider the problem where we are looking for the maximum values

of the function which is subject to

a constraint and here we have b which is b is a real number.

Well introducing b in this equation gives us

a more flexible approach which will be used later will see.

And I'll draw the diagram on which,

first of all I'll draw the graph or this equation.

So here this graph as a curve consists of all (x,y) coordinates satisfying this equation.

To be more specific,

let's suppose that below this curve g is less than b.

Above this curve, g is greater than b.

How to draw, how to represent graphically

the objective function f. It can be done with the help of the level curves.

For instance, this is a level curve at each point of

which a function takes some value C and we have a variety of such curves.

For example this is also a curve and this is also a curve and let's suppose

that the level curves with a greater values or the function.

They are situated in the how to say geographically North Eastern direction.

That means that if we would like to draw

the gradient vector or the function f at this particular point.

This is a point where a level curve of f

and the curve representing the equation is a constraint.

They touch each other.

So there is a common tangent line which

passes through this point and which is tangent both to the both curves.

So in terms of the gradient of f,

since as I said,

the value of the function grows in the North Eastern direction,

the gradient will look like that.

And I'll be using a shorthand which is nabla f.

Nabla f is the same as grad f but more convenient because it's a shorthand.

So this is nabla f. But at the same time this curve representing this equation is

a specific level curve for the function g and we know it was a proposition proven

earlier when we considered the implicit function theorem that

a gradient at a point which belongs to

a level curve is perpendicular to this level curve at this point.

That means that the gradient over g is also perpendicular to

this common tangent line so they're both parallel to each

other and well not necessarily they have the same length.

So these longer arrow will be an indication

of gradient of g. Once again I'm using nabla as notation for the gradient.

So we can tell that unless gradient is zero but since I have drawn this vector it's not.

There exists as we see from this drawing, from this diagram,

there exists lambda star.

First of all let me introduce the coordinate of this point

where two level curves touch each other by x star y star.

Then there exists lambda star which is a multiplier connecting two gradients and we can

write that the gradient of f taking at this a point x star y star equals the product.

This is a vector lambda star multiplied by the gradient of g at this point.

Ознакомьтесь с нашим каталогом

Присоединяйтесь бесплатно и получайте персонализированные рекомендации, обновления и предложения.

Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.

© Coursera Inc., 2018 Все права защищены.

Загрузить из App Store

Загрузить в Google Play