Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Гуманитарные науки и искусства
Бизнес
Компьютерные науки
Наука о данных
Информационные технологии
здоровье
Математика и логика
Личное развитие
Естественные и технические науки
Социальные науки
Изучение языков
Степени и сертификаты

Полный обзор Coursera

Обзор
Поиск
Для организаций
Войти
Присоединиться бесплатно

Geraldine Brooks session wrap up

Loading...

Чума, ведьмы и война: миры исторической художественной литературы

Виргинский университет

4.5 (оценок: 319) | Зарегистрировано учащихся: 73K

A unique and exciting introduction to the genre and craft of historical fiction, for curious students, aspiring authors--anyone with a passion for the past. Read classics of the genre, encounter bestselling writers of historical fiction, and discover your own historical archive while interacting with a global community of interested readers.

Просмотреть программу курса

Рецензии

4.5 (оценок: 319)

5 stars
210 ratings
4 stars
82 ratings
3 stars
17 ratings
2 stars
7 ratings
1 star
3 ratings

VS

Oct 03, 2016

This course has a lot of extras in it and a lot of food for future thought. The teacher is fun to learn from and I enjoyed his enthusiasm and the joy he expressed in the subject.

CH

Dec 28, 2017

Learned so much, I might take this course again! It prompted me to read several books I had not read before as well as learn much about my own writing. Thanks!

Из урока

Seminar with Geraldine Brooks

In this module author Geraldine Brooks interacts with the seminar class students of Professor Holsinger’s Historical Fiction class to discuss her book “Year of Wonders.”

Professor Holsinger introduces Geraldine Brooks15:45

Geraldine Brooks discusses the balance of the research and the evolution of the story16:51

Geraldine Brooks discusses the evolution of the characters and story17:21

Geraldine Brooks session wrap up17:55

Преподаватели

Bruce Holsinger
Professor

Текст видео

I have a question.

I think you just have such a unique perspective

as an author with your background as a writer.

And your, and your writing spirit in the Middle East.

And it's been so interesting to hearing you talk about.

I'm not.

I'm by no means comparing the Middle East to conditions in 1666.

But like, I've noticed you made some parallels,

and I was just wondering if you know,

do you have any like, readership there? >> Do I have what?

>> Like, is there is there like.

>> I just didn't hear the last, the last thing you said.

And like a group of readership there? Because this is, like.

>> Do you have a readership in the Middle East or in North Africa or in?

>>

you know of all the languages that my works been translated into, Arabic

is not one of them, unfortunately. And, but that's not, I don't take it

personally because sadly at the moment very little is being

translated into Arabic, you know the Arab speaking

world is in a kind of a publishing slump and it has been the case ever since the

civil war in Beruit in the 1980s. That used

to be the center of translation and publishing for the Arab

world and, it really hasn't come back and it's just a shame.

But, on the other hand what I did learn in the Middle East was that the

younger generation are amazingly avid intellectually and incredibly

gifted linguists and most of the, you know middle class and

above kids speak three or four languages fluently and they read widely in English.

So I may have more of a readership than I know about.

But but there haven't been translations.

>> I have a question about Anna.

I think it's interesting that you talk about the

way you wanted to give her this great ending.

And, I wonder to what extent you see Anna as a idealized or metaphorical,

or like, symbolic character, as opposed to

a rounded or flawed, or three dimensional character.

>> Yeah,

you know, I think, I, I really liked her. I probably liked her more than I should.

You know?

And now because this was my first novel and I've learned now that it's probably

not a good idea to befriend your

characters to the extent that I befriended her.

You know, she, she's jealous, and she has a

few flaws, but she doesn't have a whole lot

of flaws, and, you know, probably, as a novelist, that's a slight weakness.

You know, that I love her.

I think somebody said he loves his characters more than God loves them.

[LAUGH]

Probably a, probably a not a good place to be, you know, probably I should

have given her a bit more gritty side. But, I do, I really miss her.

Of all my characters, I miss her the most.

[LAUGH]

>> That sounds like a sequel

[LAUGH]

>> Well, I don't have to write it cause I have,

I know it in my head, I know what happens to her.

You know, she actually,

[INAUDIBLE]

dies and she marries his oldest son and that is the true marriage.

So she does have physical passion in her life.

And again, and, and she dies in an earthquake that strikes around

30 years later from the time that we leave her there.

[LAUGH]

[INAUDIBLE]

Anna's Conclusion.

Initially, I didn't, I didn't quite understand

how she would end up where she did.

I thought the ending was very unique.

But I feel though, that Anna could not have ended up where

she did, unless she'd gone through the transformation she did in the book.

Was it, did you feel that it was necessary for her to have to lose her faith

in one God or in one life that she knew to take on this other life that is,

what some would argue is the complete antithesis of Christianity

and what you have talked about in this, this book.

How, how did you prepare Anna for this transformation that you create for her?

>> I don't think, I don't think of it that way.

I don't think it's an antithesis at all as a continuum

of Christianity, if you like, or Christ-like behavior on her part.

Because what she doing, she's doing the work of the gospel,

she's healing the sick.

You know, clothing the naked, hearing the unheard.

You know, that is a continuum in her life.

She doesn't embrace, Islam but I thought, thought, thought that it

was, fun to be able to point out that because she is

interested in the healing arts, the healing arts at that time are

much more advanced in the Islamic world than they were in Europe.

And that's just, that was true. So that was.

Interesting to work with and I've already had

her, you know, with all the sinners' textbook.

And it didn't occur - I didn't, you know, it didn't occur to me that, you know, that

would be even sinner once she gets to to Iran.

But then it, it's, it's fun to play with that, you

know, the, the fact that if you're going to become a doctor

you're better off in the Islamic world at that point, then you are in, in England.

I

think that you know, the, the crisis that she goes through about her belief system

is at the same time as she's Uncertain about that

set of beliefs, she's more certain about what her role in the world

needs to be and her life is so entirely unselfish,

that you know, it's you don't have to, you don't have to have a doctrine, I guess,

to be a good person.

and if anything, you know, that would be the message.

>>

going back to I guess like, Anna's character itself, I

did kind of notice that she was like super perfect

at some times, but then the times when she did

have like a lapse in like, human perfection, I thought were.

Really poignant, like, when he, she took like the poppy seeds.

And then, also when she was int, extremely, that moment

when she was extremely jealous of Eleanor, but also of Michael.

And I wanted

to point out that passage which is on 229 in our books.

And it's the really last paragraph of the

[UNKNOWN].

I was jealous of both of them at once.

Of him because Eleanor loved him and I hungered for a greater share of her

love than I could ever hope for, and yet I was jealous of her too.

Jealous that she was loved by a man as a woman is meant to be loved.

Why should I writhe on my cold and empty

bed while she took comfort in his warm flesh?

I kept away from the door trying to still my shaking

hand so that the rattling tray would not give me away.

I entered the kitchen, walked to the washroom.

There I sat down the tray.

From it, I lifted the delicate dishes, his first, then

hers and smashed them, one by one, against the unyielding stone.

And I kind of just was wondering like, what, or

in your mind, how you have lead to that scene.

Because like, there, I definitely found that Anna and Elenor

had a really close relationship, and you know, one which

maybe, someone she admired.

Or like a mentor to her, like a close sister.

But then I never really thought that it would lead

to like, this extreme jealousy, in like, in this way.

So I was just wondering how, like, you

envisioned their relationship, and maybe Anna's side of it?

>> I think that, you know, there's a couple of things

going on there, one is, you know, I think jealousy is

something that, you know, I've struggled with in my

younger life, a kind of almost like a black

cloud that comes down when, you know, you love

somebody and you think that their affections are elsewhere.

And she's not that self-aware about who it is she really loves.

You know, she, she think she loves Eleanor, but really she loves Michael too.

And, there's that dawning awareness, but it's also her

misunderstanding of what's between Eleanor and Michael at that moment.

So what it's, it's trying to get at, how much can you know about another marriage.

Even if, you know, both the people though intimately what's

between a married couple, it's really inscrutable to an outsider.

And I think all of the, all of us who've had friends who we thought were really

happy and suddenly they have a divorce and

you don't know why and you'll never know why.

Why because there's in something in that,

you know, intimate bond that outsiders can't penetrate.

So I was trying to get at that too, that she thinks

it's so perfect and then later we'll find out not so much.

>> And she's also been so deprived of touch and

contact and intimacy in, in so many different ways you

know, from, from before the beginning of the novel even.

That it, that it makes it all the starker I think what, what happens.

>> Yeah.

And, you know, she's still, she's 18 years old.

[LAUGH]

>> Say no more.

[LAUGH]

>> I had a broader question about agency in the novel.

And There's one moment in particular on page 115, it's just

a, it's a brief little, little line it's in the Wide Green

Prison and it says, and so the rest of us set about

learning to live in the Wide Green Prison of our own election.

And when I read that I thought, oh Gosh, that's so

funny, not funny but it's strange to think of the plague

over which they have no control, I mean it's

spreading like you said, they have no germ theory.

They have no idea why it spreads, where it does and to whom it does, and, and so I

was really interested in the, the choice of confinement and

the way that gave some sort of power but also it was a very confused choice and so.

I don't know, I, I was just, I was really interested in the action

that characters are able to take in the novel.

and sort of the outcomes of that.

So, how did you, sort of, conceive of the idea of agency, in the face of

something that's so, sort of, amorphous and hard

to grab onto, as the pil, as the plague.

But, very powerful at the same time.

>> Well I just trying to think of what could you, what could have

been, you know, the gamet of reactions to this, why would people have agreed to

this quarantine and I thought, well, some of them for reasons

of faith, they really believed that was the right thing to do

and others surely because they were afraid of what would happen, because

it was not easy thing to, it's not like now, you know?

You leave Waterford you go to Leesburg.

In those days if you didn't belong to a place, you know,

you could be run out of town.

They weren't crazy about strangers and particularly, once

it, word got that he might be carrying disease

so you really did run the risk of being outcast and with no one to help you.

So, a lot of people, I'm sure, stayed out of

fear and I wanted to show all those different motivations

that people might have had and that's why there's,

you know, the consequence for the people who decide to

leave and, you know, they get attacked in the

next village and and it doesn't end well for them.

So, you know, it was important to point out the reality that this wasn't all just

I self sacrifice, in some cases it was

just self preservation that you were better off

with the people whom you knew then you would be among strangers.

>>

it's been really interesting hearing you talk about the role

that children play in your novel because I became very curious

and aware of the role they play particularly between Anna

and her father and even in Eleanor's case, and especially in

[UNKNOWN]

that the child almost acts as the deciding factor

for the fate of their parents. like the passage that particularly

struck me was on, on page 202 in my edition in your

chapter on the body of the mind, when her father's being convicted in court

and he's realizing that she's not going to help

him, he says but as I gazed back at him

in silence, the look changed to one of surprise, and

then confusion, and finally as the realization that I would

not speak came at last upon him, his whole face sagged.

There was rage there, but not but also

dissapointment, and the slow dawning of a sad understanding.

I had to look away then, for the hint of his grief was more than I could bear.

that there's

so much misunderstanding and almost madness and

rage between child-parent relations in your book.

I was just wondering if you could enlighten us on that.

>> I just, I guess I wanted the abused child to

have a little pay back there and when I'm writing that, I'm thinking about the

scene earlier where he completely humiliates her and terrifies

her and I just really, you know. He, he's

pushed her over the edge where she cannot extend any more compassion

to him. He's done, you know.

And I just wanted to try and convey what that might be like and it has costs to the

one who withholds compassion as well as to the one from whom it is withheld.

That he had it coming.

[LAUGH]

>> Well we maybe have time for, for one

more question, anyone else want to bring up something that.

>> I, I've got a question, I guess,

[CROSSTALK]

okay.

I think one of the things that we talked about in lecture was when you're

reading this book, there's so many words that you kind of that we're not familiar

with and are hard for us to might be a word I have never heard

of before, like croft, I remember I had to Google it while I was reading.

is that something you intentionally place in your

novel in order to, you know, sort of.

I don't know, encourage us to do further

research or what was your intent in creating this world and

sort of making almost, not alienating, but so different from our own.

>> So, it's very important to me to try and get the language right.

Or if not exactly right.

Because really, she probably would have spoken in an archaic Derbyshire dialect.

But if I would have written the book in

archaic Derbyshire dialect nobody would have bothered to read it.

So, it's a case of trying

to get close to a sense of authenticity, if not the authentic itself.

And I guess I, I would go back to

something that a novelist called Jim Craigs told me once.

He was telling me about researching his

novel Quarantine, which is set in biblical Israel,

and to do the research he went camping in the Judaean desert with a Bedouin guide.

And the first morning they

wake up and his guide brings him a cup of Cardamom scented coffee, Arabic coffee and

says Mr. Jim how did you sleep. And Jim says Ahmed I slept like a log.

Then he said he raised his eyes to the Judean hillside, no logs, no trees.

[LAUGH]

So he turns to his guide and says Ahmed, how did you sleep?

And Ahmed says, Mr. Jim, I slept like a dead donkey.

[LAUGH]

And so to me, it's the case of, you've gotta get

all the logs in the book and turn them into dead donkeys

[LAUGH]

So, I, I take a lot of time in, you know,

in word choice, I don't want to, I don't want to

impose a burden on the reader so I hope you can

always figure out from the context, what the unusual vocabulary is.

But, it's very important in Caleb's Crossing there's

an example that I give as the same thing

like, I want my protagonist in that book, at one point, to talk about a fetus but

I'm pretty sure that in 1655

Massachusetts, she's not using the word fetus.

So you can research this.

There's actually a wonderful volume called the Oxford

Historical Thesaurus of the English Language, and digs

down through vocabulary to every word that's been

used For a thing, right down to early Icelandic.

So you can go look up fetus and

dig down to mid 17th century and find that the

word that she would have used for fetus is shapeling.

When you put the word shapeling in her mouth, you're time traveling and I mean

it's It gives you a, an insight into how people think, if you get the right word.

So I hope you find a lot of dead donkeys in the book.

[LAUGH]

>> Well, this has been a really extraordinary

hour, so and thank, thank you so much.

We can't thank you enough for joining our

class and joining our larger class as well.

So thank you, Geraldine Brooks. >> Wonderful to be with you.

Ознакомьтесь с нашим каталогом

Присоединяйтесь бесплатно и получайте персонализированные рекомендации, обновления и предложения.

Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.

© Coursera Inc., 2019 Все права защищены.

Загрузить из App Store

Загрузить в Google Play

Coursera
О проекте
Руководство
Карьера
Каталог
Сертификаты
Сертификаты MasterTrack™
Степени
Для организаций
Для правительственных организаций

Сообщество
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

На связи
Блог
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Технический блог

Еще
Условия
Конфиденциальность
Помощь
Доступность
Пресса
Контакты
Справочник
Филиалы