So, when we turn to look at Asia we see some of the worst extremes in drug policies. So, here in this region drugs are often portrayed as a threat to state security, and to the morality and core values of a society. A lot of these beliefs are driven by a lack of evidence in science-based knowledge about drugs. A lot of people's education and knowledge about drugs, and how drug use could affect you is driven by really poorly informed drug prevention programs for example. So, part of these perspectives then justify the use of incredibly harsh punishment against any type of drug related activity. So in relation to people caught using drugs, you see really harsh measures. For example, the use of forced urine testing often by law enforcement but also by health. This is also underpinned by the fact that in a lot of the drug laws in a number of countries in the region, consumption itself is a crime. So even if you're not caught with any drugs in your possession, if you are suspected of using you could be forced to do a urine test. If your test positive then you could then face further ramifications in the criminal justice system. USOC compulsory registration with security agencies which could then lead to ongoing surveillance and random interrogations by police. We also see the use of corporal punishment such as caning and flogging in countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, as well as, in the Modi's. Another one that has a particularly huge effect on large numbers of people is the use of force or compulsory rehabilitation. A lot of these measures involve torture, particularly for example, harassment and violence by police, as well as, forced labor in those for example, compulsory rehabilitation centres that I mentioned, as well as, violations of the right to health for people who use drugs. A prime example is if people are detained, incarcerated, or held in these compulsory rehabilitation centres sometimes for up to three years and then for repeated terms of two or three years if you're caught repeatedly for drug use. You don't necessarily have access to harm reduction or any type of evidence-based drug dependence treatment in those facilities. Now, for drug supply activities such as the trafficking and the production of drugs, people often face really long prison sentences. Even the death penalty, as well as, mandatory minimum penalties and mandatory sentencing of the death penalty. As an example in Malaysia, possession of 200 grams or more of Cannabis or 15 grams or more or heroin can lead to a death penalty sentence. But the death penalty for drug offenses goes against international law. In the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the use of the death penalty could apply for most serious crimes. But this has been interpreted by UN authorities as applying to intentional killing. So therefore, sentencing someone to the death penalty for possession exceeding a certain quantity does not amount is non-intentional killing and should not be sentenced to the death penalty. Other human rights violations that we can see, and as you see certainly in the horrors in the Philippines is extra judicial killings against people who are suspected of using or dealing drugs. This horrendous policy in the Philippines also involves the arbitrary listing of people who are supposedly suspected of using and dealing drugs. Those lists are compiled by police and supposedly verified by local authorities, and then afterwards, people who are on those lists are then forced to report themselves to local authorities and forced to confess to either using or dealing drugs. We see again, police brutality against people involved or suspected of being involved in drug supply activities and this has an effect particularly on those who are poor and already marginalized. For example, they don't have the means to bribe their way out of an interaction with police. We see violations of the cultural and traditional rights of indigenous people for example, when the right to use particular substances as part of their tradition is prohibited. We see also a lack of due process and fair trial for people who are arrested for drug use or supply activities, particularly for example, if people are too poor or otherwise, don't have access to legal representation. We see as alluded to before the imposition of disproportionate penalties and sentences. For drug offenses in many countries, the penalties for possession alone of certain quantities can be more severe than for rape and for murder. Again, we see the use of mandatory minimums and mandatory sentences for the death penalty. In a lot of cases, this disproportionate sentencing as seen in the fact that only the type of drug and the quantity of drug and whether is in someone's possession are the only factors considered during sentencing. So there is no consideration of a person's intention, or that person's circumstances when determining this sentence. Last but not least, we see disproportionately high rates of incarceration of people for drug offenses. Now according to United Nations estimates, about one in five people currently in prison around the world are held for drug offenses, and about 83 percent of those people are held for possession offenses alone. So, a significant proportion of people are held in prison not for serious violent offenses, not for offenses that have caused any significant or any harm to others but for possession alone. A particular example that we see is the case of Thailand, that similar like the US has incredibly high rates of incarceration. In Southeast Asia, Thailand has by far the biggest prison population, over 300,000 people in prison for a population of around 70 million. So, the prison population in Thailand to give some perspective is double that of Indonesia and the Philippines which has much bigger people populations than Thailand. In Thailand, the general prison population of both men and women, 74 percent of people are held for a drug offense. For women, this is even higher. Over 80 percent of women are held in prison for drug offense.