The Capstone project will allow you to continue to apply and refine the data analytic techniques learned from the previous courses in the Specialization to address an important issue in society. You will use real world data to complete a project with our industry and academic partners. For example, you can work with our industry partner, DRIVENDATA, to help them solve some of the world's biggest social challenges! DRIVENDATA at www.drivendata.org, is committed to bringing cutting-edge practices in data science and crowdsourcing to some of the world's biggest social challenges and the organizations taking them on. Or, you can work with our other industry partner, The Connection (www.theconnectioninc.org) to help them better understand recidivism risk for people on parole seeking substance use treatment. For more than 40 years, The Connection has been one of Connecticut’s leading private, nonprofit human service and community development agencies. Each month, thousands of people are assisted by The Connection’s diverse behavioral health, family support and community justice programs. The Connection’s Institute for Innovative Practice was created in 2010 to bridge the gap between researchers and practitioners in the behavioral health and criminal justice fields with the goal of developing maximally effective, evidence-based treatment programs. A major component of the Capstone project is for you to be able to choose the information from your analyses that best conveys results and implications, and to tell a compelling story with this information. By the end of the course, you will have a professional quality report of your findings that can be shown to colleagues and potential employers to demonstrate the skills you learned by completing the Specialization.
Writing Your Report: Results
Loading...
Из курса от партнера Wesleyan University
Data Analysis and Interpretation Capstone
22 оценки
Из урока
Module 3. Exploratory Data Analysis
In this Module, your goals are to 1) explore your data more extensively through descriptive and basic statistical analyses and data visualization; and 2) complete Milestone Assignment 3 as described in the Assignment. By the end of this module, you will have begun to draft your final report Results section, including some figures.
Познакомьтесь с преподавателями
Jen RoseResearch Professor
Psychology
Lisa DierkerProfessor
Psychology
The results section of your final report is where you summarize and
interpret the results of each statistical analysis.
Typically when we develop a results section,
we start with the simplest analysis, which is usually descriptive statistics
in which we provide the reader with a little bit more information
about the distributions of our predictors in response variable.
Then we move onto a bivariate analyses where we describe the associations between
a predictor and response variable.
And then finally we report our multivariable analyses.
Typically our primary analysis with multiple predictors.
The results of our descriptive and bivariate analyses can be brief.
What we really want to do is provide most of the detail, the results for
the multivariable analyses since this is typically the goal of our study.
One thing to keep in mind is that tables can be useful for
summarizing a lot of results.
In many statistical analyses that we do, particularly machine learning methods,
we may have a lot of predictors in writing out the descriptive statistics in text for
each of these variables can make the result section very long and
difficult to read.
Summarizing all that information in a table makes it a lot easier.
If you have your statistics in a table
then you really don't need to report those numbers again in the text unless,
of course you want to highlight some particular variable.
And figures are also very important.
Figures really help readers understand what you're talking about
when you describe the results of your statistical analyses.
Having a good visualization is very useful for people to understand your results.
But we should remember that figures should be relevant to the research question and
they should enhance understanding of the results.
So, we don't want to add figures that don't do anything to help explain our
results or are not really relevant to answering our research question.
Most of the time when we write a final report, they tend to be pretty brief so
we don't always have room for a lot of figures.
So we pick and choose those figures carefully by choosing the ones that really
show an important result or describe a more complex result.
When we write about our results and we include figures in the results section
we want to make sure that we refer to the figures in the text so that we can
point the readers to the figures while we're describing the results.
Here's an example of a results section.
We're starting out with our descriptive statistics.
You can see that I've depicted the descriptive statistics in a table with
the quantitative data analytic variables.
And I refer the reader to the table.
You can also see that I am not
repeating the actual statistics in the text because it's in the table.
Although I do so for
the response variable in order to highlight that particular variable.
In addition, there were a couple of binary variables.
The descriptive statistics for
those variables are not in the table, so I present percentages and
the number of observations for each of the two binary variables.
Then we move on to describing our bivariate analyses.
Here I present some scatter plots,
which provide a great visualization of the association between
our manufacturing lead time response variable and the quantitative predictors.
Again, you can see in parentheses that I've written
Figure 1 to refer the reader to the figure while I discuss the results.
Then I talk about what the figures are showing.
The scatter plots reveal that the manufacturing lead times were shorter when
there was a greater number of ingredient units in stock.
Then I add the results on my Pearson correlation analysis.
R equals -0.79, which is the value of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient,
and then the p value associated with that correlation coefficient.
The scatter plots also show that manufacturing lead times
increased when production workers had worked more hours on their shift
before beginning production.
And again I provide the Pearson correlation coefficient
which is equal to 0.57 and the associated p value.
Note that I talk about the direction of the association.
So rather than just saying manufacturing lead times are significantly
associated with the number of ingredient units in stock
I talk about the direction of the association.
Otherwise, it's not especially informative.
When I talk about the direction of the association, what I mean is that I'm
indicating whether or not it's a positive or negative association.
Manufacturing lead time was negatively associated with ingredient units in stock.
And I described that negative association by writing manufacturing lead
time's shorter when there was a greater number of ingredient units in stock.
And then I do the same thing with the association between number of
hours production workers had worked on this shift before beginning production and
manufacturing lead times which was a positive association.
Manufacturing lead times increased when production workers had
worked more hours on their shift before beginning production.
And then I write that manufacturing lead time was not significantly associated with
the number of steps involved in the production of a batch, and
I provide the Pearson correlation coefficient, -.05 and
the p value and it was not associated with the number of hours of sleep that
production workers reported getting the night before batch production began.
And again, I reported the Pearson correlation coefficient.
0.01, p = 0.71.
Note that the figure has a title that describes what's going in the figure.
Note also that I follow the standard graphing convention
where my predictive variable is spotted on the horizontal, or x axis.
And my response variable is plotted on the vertical, or y axis.
Note also, that the variable labels are explained.
Rather than just providing the actual variable name, the reader can understand
what the variable means without having to refer to a code book.
These are important characteristics of figures.
You want to make sure that you have a title and
you want to make sure that the variable labels are informative.
So in the previous slide, I summarized the association between
each quantitative predictor, and the quantitative response variable
using scatter plots In a Pearson Correlation Coefficient.
In this next section I discuss the association between each
categorical predictor and the quantitative response variable.
The appropriate bivariate analysis when you have a categorical predictor and
a quantitative response variable Is analysis of variance.
So I write analysis of variance indicated that average manufacturing
lead times did not differ significantly as a function of equipment failure, and
I provide the s statistic and the associated degrees of freedom
in parentheses, and the p value associated with the f-statistic.
And then finally, the r-square, which is the variance
in manufacturing lead times that is accounted for by equipment failure.
I also write that trainee involvement and
production is also not significantly associated with manufacturing lead time.
And again I provide the f-statistic, the p value and the r square.
And then I point the reader to figures 2 and
3 to give them a visual of the association.
Notice also that when I describe the results of the analysis of variance,
I do not include the means in the text.
That's because I have provided the means in the figures.
Finally I discuss the results of my multivariable analysis.
I first point the reader to figure four, which showed that five of the six
variables were retained in the model selected by the Lasso Regression Analysis.
Only the number of production steps predictor was excluded.
The number of ingredient units in stock.
And the number of shift hours employees work before beginning production were most
strongly associated with manufacturing lead time followed by equipment failure,
training involvement in production and the number of hours of sleep
that production workers reported getting the night before their shifts began and
this is shown in table two.
Table 2 shows the last or least angle regression variable selection summary.
The average squared error, which is also the means squared error,
associated with each variable as it was entered into the model.
Then I provide a little bit of information about the direction of the association
with each variable, and the response variable manufacturing lead time.
Manufacturing lead times were shorter for batches that had a greater number of
ingredients in stock, and when production operators reported sleeping for
more hours the night prior to bad production.
On the other hand, working more shift hours prior to manufacturing,
equipment failure and having trainees involved in batch production
was associated with increased lead times.
Together these five predictors accounted for
93.3% of the variance in manufacturing lead time.
Then I report the mean square error for
the test data set compared to the mean square error for the training data set.
To show that they differed very little, which suggests that predictive accuracy
did not decline in the last regression algorithm development and training data
set, with applied to predict lead manufacturing times in a test data set.
And again, I refer the readers to figure 4,
which shows the mean square error rates for both the tests and training data sets.
Ознакомьтесь с нашим каталогом
Присоединяйтесь бесплатно и получайте персонализированные рекомендации, обновления и предложения.
Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.
© Coursera Inc., 2018 Все права защищены.
