Вернуться к Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling

4.6
звезд
Оценки: 8,043

## Лучшие рецензии

AP

15 июня 2019 г.

Very clear and articulate explanation of the concepts. He doesn't skip a step in the sequencing ideas, drawing comparisons and differences, and illustrating both visually and story-telling. Excellent.

S

30 нояб. 2020 г.

for the beginer like me i have experience in banking of 8 years still for me this fundamentals are new specially quantitative modelling.Kindly provide banking related examples in here too.

thanks

Фильтр по:

## 1451–1475 из 1,536 отзывов о курсе Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling

автор: Michael S

6 дек. 2017 г.

Not enough about formulas or real world application. Was hoping to see examples applied in Excel.

автор: Sidney A

8 мая 2016 г.

Nice primer for modeling, but wish there were more workable problems to help hit the point home.

автор: Bharat J

20 июня 2020 г.

Too descriptive for a quantitative course. Would've preferred more problem solving exercises.

автор: Eike A H

9 сент. 2019 г.

-no explanation on errors

-too theoretical and abstract with lack of examples and own practice

автор: S B

26 мар. 2018 г.

Could have been more advanced from the perspective of practical use-cases of data modeling.

автор: jyoti v

23 окт. 2018 г.

The course is a bit too introductory for me. I'm looking for more challenging material.

автор: Kangkang W

17 окт. 2016 г.

most contents are explicit on ppt, it is sometimes not necessary to view the lectures.

автор: Josh R

17 мая 2020 г.

Lots of information, not much opportunity to apply practical usage to the theories

автор: martino g

30 мар. 2020 г.

Content is good but the teacher is extremely boring. Had to struggle to finish it.

автор: Paul M

7 июля 2020 г.

My name was spelled incorrectly on my certificate, how to do I correct this?

автор: Mathew L

27 апр. 2016 г.

I would have liked the quizzes to explain why an answer was right or wrong.

автор: Brendan C

22 мая 2018 г.

good course, quizzes should not be locked though...disappointed with that.

автор: Deleted A

19 февр. 2018 г.

I think the contents of this course can be more difficult and challenging.

автор: Michelle l G

9 февр. 2017 г.

It was an interesting module, however, not sure how I will apply this in

автор: Gary V

11 июля 2017 г.

Very basic things that any person with a stats background should know

автор: Alec E

23 июля 2020 г.

Not that enjoyable. Decent information but pretty boring to watch.

автор: Abhed M

12 янв. 2020 г.

It should be more rigorous. I completed this course in three days.

автор: Chalal S

8 окт. 2021 г.

The explaining is good, but the concepts in the course are basic.

автор: Dominique B

8 апр. 2020 г.

a bit too simple, I would have expected more practical excersises

автор: TheSovereignIndividual

13 апр. 2020 г.

Nice, course - could spend more time on practice and examples.

автор: Anup K D

2 мая 2021 г.

Need more examples. Logarithmic Regression was not very clear

автор: Olivia X

18 сент. 2016 г.

too easy. not enough practical skills or tools teaching

автор: Abhishek P

9 февр. 2017 г.

There should be lab or hands one calculation exercise.

автор: Steeve V

3 февр. 2017 г.

It was theoretical but provided an apt understanding.

автор: Aeshvry R

18 февр. 2022 г.

Was little difficult and had non engaging lectures