Exercises should be more tough so that students can read a lot on the web about different thingsthey could do with Javascript. Hands-on experience should be given to be more interactive.

Not sufficient hands on work. The submission tasks are too easy. The pace is very slow. I miss content on text Editors and source control. However, the course provides a good overview.

It's a very basic course to learn a very small things about bootstrap, jquery and HTML, but I think the level is too advanced for non-programming people, it should be better structured.

You can finish this course in one evening. It's a nice introduction to the basics if you're brand new to web development, but don't shell out your cash for this course in particular.

Too much time is dedicated to the very basics. It could have been shorter and more concise. I opted out of this course in favour of the one from the Hong Cong University, sorry =)

I believe the two first modules (html, css) are way too basic to really learn anything. The javascript segment is better because the concepts are explained more in depth.

This course have excellent title but not that great contents. It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap and jquery most of part as just touched. contents are too less

The course feels too rushed/condensed for someone with no real scripting/coding background. I honestly felt this course wasn't for me because I wasn't learning enough.

I was a little lost during projects, there no extensive videos for languages but on the other hand there was good materials and refereed links that could help.

Plus: responsive web programming, notions of bootstrap and jQuery

Negative: ultra-beginner level, very low-level basics, not much hands-on use of HTML/CSS/JS

Easy to understand, but not so deep in terms of concepts. The activities per module seem irrelevant and too easy in correlation to the content presented.

Good to learn basics, but would like to have more chances throughout to apply lessons and not just listen/write notes/try to use at the end of each week.

It takes forever to get peer reviewed not to mention i peer reviewed people work from 2020 and we're in 2022. so when I'm going to get my certificate?

I was unsatisfied with the tests and assignments given.

the concepts being learned in the week were not applied to the given assignments of the week

Is not updated.

Good for starters, Javascript course base in jquery so complicated to understand. The way you write code is not appropiate nowadays.

Course content is good. But the assignments could be a little more complex. Also, jQuery could be handled separately for better understanding.

is not suitable for beginners.

just general information.

how you can expect beginners to learn bootstrap and jQuery form the first course.!

I would say 2.5 of 5. The content doesn't go deep but isn't bad. The practices are way too easy, I think they should be more challenging.

Nice course to start with, Had the programming experience, But Never tried my hands with UX, This course got me started well. Thanks..!!

Pros: Good course to begin, and the course was clearly presented.

Cons: Errors on quiz, bad coding styles introduced in some lectures.

The content is too elementary. The practical exercises are too straigh forward. The course does not cover much, frankly.

it jumped so fast from Elementry level to Advanced. And starting from JavaScript then using only jQuery got me frustrated.

In my opinion it is wrong to say about frameworks first. Developer needs fundamental knowledge to grow faster and easier.

The teachers were good buy to cover HTML, CSS, and Javascript the course should have been longer or broken up by subject.

This course is basic, these are things you could easily learn in a tutorial online.The syntex that is used is dated.