The best introduction classes, gives an overall idea about UI/UX. Grateful for the efforts taken by the Georgia Tech and Coursera. Looking forward to see more courses related to my career. Thank you.
This is an insightful introductory course to User Experience Design. While it is just an introduction, the lessons and the examples provided were comprehensive, leaving you with a thirst for more.
автор: Carlos G L
•Very basic but very good
автор: Aaryan k
•good course for beginers
автор: Hadwin Z
•It is very useful course
автор: MANUEL G V
•very informative course
автор: Vrishti j
•Material is really good
автор: Riyadi A
•good for introduction
автор: Isabel R
•Good overview of UX.
автор: 0302music
•A good introduction
автор: Michael R
•Great intro class.
автор: Ioannis G
•Entry level course
автор: Grace J I R
•Begginer's Course.
автор: Crystal M
•very good intro
автор: Sasikumar V
•good learning
автор: venkatesh R
•Well use full
автор: Clarice L
•Informative!
автор: Bojan V
•Basic course
автор: Lara W
•Great course
автор: ayala g
•thank you!
автор: Chelsea D
•T
h
e
o
n
e
автор: Atrem V
•Thanks!
автор: Azhar M s
•Good
автор: 丽丽 万
•good
автор: Zohra A
•good
автор: Andrea R
•This was okay for a theoretical-only and very basic introduction to user experience design. There was a LOT of repetition of previous content in every video, which may be great for some users but which was boring and annoying for me. I also found the layout of the video unhelpful (slides on the left, person on the right) and would have preferred it the other way round. I often didn't even realize that a slide had changed because my eye kept being drawn to the lecturer instead of the slides and because there was little visual differentiation between the slides (fonts, sizes, colors). The slides were often hard to read because the text was very spread out and therefore hard to grasp at a glance. There also often was more text than I could read in the amount of time it was visible (so I had to pause frequently) and the lecturer didn't always refer to everything that was shown. I did not feel motivated at all to do any of the suggested exercises, mostly because there was no feedback system for whatever I would have produced (and because the exercises weren't available in writing anywhere, just in the middle of the videos). The quizzes were fairly thorough, which I think was good. Overall, I probably would have learned the content better (and much faster) with just a few pages of text instead of all the videos because the video format didn't offer any extra benefit for me.
автор: rachel f
•feedback about quiz in no order:
1) "Tertiary stakeholders may not use the design at all, but are directly affected by the design in either a negative or a positive way." -- this would be the cashier at the store. If the payment doesn't go through the cashier could be affected.
2) "main pitfall of requirement gathering is not knowing all of the appropriate techniques" a pitfall is a hidden or unsuspected danger or difficulty. There are no dangers or difficulties inherent to requirement gathering. A pitfall of rock climbing is falling to your death. Better question would be "a main challenge to successful Requirement Gathering could be non-communicative participants".
Question 18:
Secondary stake holders: "do not use the design directly but may do IT indirectly".
Do what?! What is "It"? Do the design? The function? Task? Secondary stakeholders will be affected by design's changes and updates, and may have a to accommodate or react. A user likes the new expense report interface (primary) but it takes AP longer to process the payment because the expense categories are not aligning with cost codes.
So far I like the course and look forward to completing it. But I find myself wanting to edit the manuscript, and reword the quiz questions.