Chevron Left
Вернуться к Практическая безопасность

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Практическая безопасность от партнера Мэрилендский университет в Колледж-Парке

4.6
звезд
Оценки: 2,837
Рецензии: 695

О курсе

This course focuses on how to design and build secure systems with a human-centric focus. We will look at basic principles of human-computer interaction, and apply these insights to the design of secure systems with the goal of developing security measures that respect human performance and their goals within a system....

Лучшие рецензии

IR
20 июня 2016 г.

I like how in depth this gets. it explains it very well an in ways for people who are starting off in this field to get a basic understanding in exactly what we are learning. very well put together!

DG
28 июня 2016 г.

Despite not being very fond of areas such as human-computer interaction, I found this course to be well-presented and useful. Definitely a necessity for anyone planning on building secure software.

Фильтр по:

626–650 из 682 отзывов о курсе Практическая безопасность

автор: Morten V C

20 окт. 2019 г.

Very usefull.

автор: Rishi P T

2 мар. 2020 г.

Basic things

автор: ikwak

3 окт. 2017 г.

Thanks! :)

автор: salissou B

29 нояб. 2020 г.

Good

автор: Ajay

23 мая 2020 г.

good

автор: Shriram s

23 мар. 2020 г.

good

автор: Inna T

17 апр. 2020 г.

This course does not cover a lot of content and has more connection do design and HCI rather than security. There is no support in discussions, no discussions. There is only one assignment and it says in the instructions you will be able to upload a screenshot. Apparently that feature was forgotten because you can’t, you need to use an outside service and paste a link. There are words in reading that were supposed to be URLs but don’t work (like it says “click here” but “here” is not a link). The course feels sloppy and not very useful.

автор: Ricardo L C T

7 авг. 2018 г.

confusing, low quality of video discussions, low quality of presenters on the felling they are not prepared to discuss in the panel. low quality of quiz with question not covered. asked to read a very long paper about SSL that is a research of a class study not relevant for the informative intent of the course. took me too much time for me to read and I gave up the SSL paper.

автор: Amarender B

17 июня 2017 г.

Contents seems repeatative . Also When you already discussing the PDF contents in video lecture, I don't see asking to complete PDF reading before video lecture. I have spent reading the doc and felt I could complete the course much faster if i could skip reading some big PDFs. Otherwise it is good.

автор: Rob C

23 янв. 2018 г.

There are some questions that can be debated for clarity. Example: A company creates a password V^$5t.b2. Is this easy to crack no. But the question ALSO says it's given to the employee on a piece of paper. Is this easy? Yes, there's paper laying around with passwords on them.

автор: Burak I

8 авг. 2020 г.

The course is so old. Even the concept is still the same, the versions of applications that takes part in the videos are really old. The versions of gmail that took part in some week's lecture seems at least 3-4 years old.

автор: Jacek E

1 нояб. 2019 г.

Well prepared and interesting lectures. However, for a intermediate course, I've expected more comprehensive content. Let's see what the next courses for the cybersecurity specialization have to offer.

автор: Kyfos N

7 окт. 2020 г.

The course described the topics very well. Very easy to understand the defferent meanings. The material is from 6-7 years ago and should be updated.

автор: Johnny O

13 мая 2016 г.

Videos with guest speakers were unhelpful. Also, quizzes were not accurate and poorly written questions.

автор: Jeroen R

24 апр. 2016 г.

OK, but not really in-depth. Still has useful pointers, but they could be summarized on an A4 sheet.

автор: Piotr M

12 нояб. 2017 г.

The course was really good when played at 1.5x speed, at the normal pace it was really too slow.

автор: Ivan

8 сент. 2017 г.

Good course, but not really what I expected.

All materials are common things and knowledge.

автор: Tom G

13 июля 2018 г.

Some good info, but the course needs to be updated to correct long known mistakes.

автор: Mian A J

10 авг. 2020 г.

Content was a little boring. Secondly, Voice quality wasn't up to the mark.

автор: Daniel K P

20 окт. 2019 г.

Needs more content ; present course repeats

information, too often

автор: Andrew A

10 окт. 2020 г.

The content is good, It partially outdated being made in ~2013

автор: Giulio B

25 июля 2020 г.

Very little useful information

автор: Alberto R

21 нояб. 2016 г.

Useful concepts. Quite simple.

автор: RAVITEJA R K

11 авг. 2020 г.

not interesting

автор: Mitch H

29 сент. 2020 г.

low quality