Chevron Left
Вернуться к Technical Writing

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Technical Writing от партнера Московский физико-технический институт

4.5
звезд
Оценки: 113
Рецензии: 32

О курсе

The course develops technical writing skills necessary to communicate information gained through a process of technical or experimental work. The course highlights the factors that determine the degree of technicality of the language and concepts involved. You will learn how to write different technical reports, e.g., laboratory reports, research reports, design and feasibility reports, progress reports, consulting reports, etc. The course also approaches several language, structure, style, and content issues that you can encounter while reporting the results of your research....

Лучшие рецензии

EP

Nov 12, 2019

This course is a great gateway to the world of technical writing. A good effort by the trainers and curriculum creators at familiarising the learner with the basics, nuances and the requisites.

DD

Mar 30, 2018

It's an amazing begin for peoples that need to have a first contact with the technical writing. The activities and lessons permit an engagement with other participants.

Фильтр по:

26–31 из 31 отзывов о курсе Technical Writing

автор: Mohammed A J

Sep 18, 2017

Great course and got great insights about Technical Writing. Adding some Technical Writing Tools would have been even nicer. Thanks

автор: BIBIN V

Jan 21, 2019

Very good course. Subject is very interesting. Some time there found some error on mobile application.

автор: Bogdan-Sebastian B

Feb 26, 2019

Information needs a little more work. So do the tests!

автор: Diana

Feb 20, 2019

It's nice and concise. I like it!

автор: Lee A B

Apr 26, 2019

Needs to be updated, tests answers don't match material.

автор: Alice B

Mar 22, 2020

Most questions in the tests were phrased very poorly, to the extent that, despite having thoroughly followed the lessons and taken notes, I had to do a lot of guesswork. Many things were explained as absolute truths when it's obvious that they could change depending on the type of technical document one is writing.

Moreover, the course is really hard to follow. The presentation is unengaging and the speaker's pronunciation is not the clearest. In a course that preaches conciseness and clarity, you'd expect these qualities to be reflected in the way materials are presented. It is not the case.

To conclude on a positive note, there are some solid learnings to be taken home, if you are patient enough to look for them.