Jan 15, 2019
Very interesting, varied lectures with relevant presentations of Danish companies in all sorts of situations. The assignment was fun to do, but the grading process could be a bit smoother.
Feb 25, 2016
This was a tough one. Thank you for adopting case studies like Vestas and Carlsberg to help us understand various aspects of formulation. More importantly, pitfalls to be avoided.
автор: Manfred T•
Feb 23, 2016
автор: Mohit A•
Dec 13, 2017
автор: Umut B•
Dec 19, 2019
I didn't like both scoring methodology (1-3 only) in the peer review assignment and the assignment itself. The effort was just copying the assignment in the previous section but there is a significant amount of effort asked (the deck covering 8 slides + 2 pages for a summary) Hopefully, the third course in the specialization will be different.
автор: Sherry G•
Feb 29, 2016
The materials were interesting and relevant. The instructions for the final project were a bit cryptic - it was not completely clear what the instructor wanted. The submissions I reviewed were all over the board and none came close to the grading rubric
автор: Michael I•
Apr 12, 2016
The course content itself was good, however the final assignment was vague and confusing. I think my coursemates had the same problem; all of the submissions I reviewed failed to discuss in any way at least one of the learning objectives.
автор: Ayman S A•
Feb 12, 2016
Could be improved.. the ideas seem disconnected there is no clear flow of the ideas presented in different weeks and the specific actions to formulate a strategy. but overall good course with excellent frameworks. Thanks a lot Coursera
автор: Johan M•
Jun 27, 2017
The material is good, but I feel there should be at least one example given of a executive summary, before asking students to write one. It would also be nice to be able to download some slides and / summaries of the lessons.
автор: Elina J•
May 25, 2016
This course was more diverse than I thought it would be and I really enjoyed it, however I thought the end of year project could have provided more differentiated prep material as that confused me.
автор: Philipp H•
Apr 03, 2018
Not a bad course but a lot of materials are outdated of paywalled by now. Also, review criteria and keystone project definition differ so that no perfect result can be achieved.
автор: Christoph M•
Feb 19, 2017
The course gave a nice overview on strategy formulation but was in my view a bit inconsistent. However I learned the main techniques used in formulation, so no regrets.
автор: Alexander Z•
Apr 11, 2019
Its ok, perhaps too theoretical, most of the basic strategy consulting companies give a more enanaced and "buy in" approach on how to formulate a strategy and why
автор: Peter H•
Jul 26, 2016
I think the level was a bit on the low side and the time i had to spend on each week was far less compared with the first module. Videos maintain high standard.
автор: Juan C R C•
Apr 05, 2016
Not too much different information from what can be found in internet for free.
If it was cheaper the relationship cost-quality could improve.
автор: Fabienne L•
Dec 09, 2015
Interesting but not really practical. This module could benefit of more examples when it comes to formulating strategies.
автор: Will C•
Mar 03, 2019
why is that the same final exam than for Strategy Management' course... It should have great assigning another task
автор: Paul E H•
Jul 27, 2016
I felt the course was ok, but wanted more. It seemed very general, even with the focus in the end on e-Types.
автор: Josue D•
Oct 23, 2016
I wish teachers look at our work too rather than student though they do their jobs.
автор: Augustine Q T Y•
Jan 30, 2016
Too few students.
автор: Antoine C•
Jan 13, 2016
автор: Ankur G•
Mar 19, 2016
This is a very simple, brief and useful course.
The modules are short, concise but do not go into lot of details. Is a good course to audit/browse for free but may not be good enough against a verified option. Anyways, paying for verified course is subject to personal value derivation.
While I had rated earlier for the above reasons before the course finished. I am facing the exact same problem with this course as I faced with earlier course.
The grading process is badly constructed for final assignment. In fact, now I am learning from coursera staff that may be there are not enough students to grade my peer review assignment.
So please do audit this course but do not be trapped in specialization.
автор: Gayathri R S•
Jun 17, 2016
The speaking style and body language of the instructor was quite monotonous when teaching the content. For the most part of the course, it felt like the instructor was just "reading" the teleprompter without blinking for several seconds! He did not attempt to teach the students in these videos. It could have been MUCH better if he had used better presentation tools and shorter sentences.
автор: Matthew C•
Apr 05, 2017
While the content of this course was presented in an engaging way, the assessment task lacks context. To then be asked to peer review others based on this is particularly disengaging.
автор: Alvaro J•
Jul 04, 2017
The course could have developed on new theories of strategic planning, the concepts were basic and if you joined the specialization, the second course added only a few new points.
автор: Cindy H•
Feb 08, 2016
The professor isn't that great, and really difficult to follow (high speed, English pronunciation not obvious). The assignment was also really similar to the
автор: Walter J•
Dec 21, 2015
At times a direct contrast the the precursor class. Assignments too easy. Lectures okay but syllabus lacked structure. Too easy. Wasted time.