Chevron Left
Вернуться к программные процессы и методы гибкой разработки

Отзывы учащихся о курсе программные процессы и методы гибкой разработки от партнера Альбертский университет

4.7
звезд
Оценки: 4,985
Рецензии: 810

О курсе

This course delves into a variety of processes to structure software development. It also covers the foundations of core Agile practices, such as Extreme Programming and Scrum....

Лучшие рецензии

KC

11 авг. 2017 г.

I had read about the different agiles methodologies out there but It was until I took this course that I could "digest" them and internalize how to chose the right one for me and how to apply them.

PD

26 мая 2020 г.

The course is highly interactive...i like the concept of giving questions based on the the information learnt in that particular video...I personally like the instructors teaching methods ....

Фильтр по:

801–807 из 807 отзывов о курсе программные процессы и методы гибкой разработки

автор: Fiona H

28 мая 2017 г.

It's really quite boring. Instructors are like reading from a textbook...

автор: Nithya R

29 мар. 2016 г.

Could have been more practice than theory.

автор: Sumitikhanna

9 окт. 2020 г.

Doing this course coz i had free subscription for couple of months. I have enrolled for the specialization which i would still complete. Having said that the topic in itself was very interesting however the content is nowhere close to product management. Role of Product owner includes: understanding business requirement, creating user stories, prioritizing backlog, understanding business context, Product vision none of the topic is being covered.

This feedback is based on first two courses of the specialization by now all above topics should have been started considering last one course is simulation project. Disappointed with the content.

автор: Ellinor G

4 нояб. 2020 г.

Like many other reviewers have said, this course is very badly thought - and executed jus as badly. The lecturers just read a lot of theoretical concepts from a prompter. The few examples and "quizzes" are extremely poorly chosen and explanations are even worse. There are 20 minute videos with not even a single picture or drawing in them, just the lecturer reading and reading and reading a loooong text from the prompter...

Avoid taking this course if you don't have time and money to squander!

автор: Anna G

5 апр. 2020 г.

Dear Kenny Wong,

Thank you for your work. For me, the course seemed a little informative, resources, presentations. The course is not useful to me. Due to the difficult economic situation, could you return the money for the course

автор: Shriram J

21 июня 2020 г.

Too academic. It's too pedantic. What difference does it make if I call a task an activity or an activity a task? I need real world examples and tips to excel at the job.

автор: Tamer N

10 авг. 2020 г.

very basic and a bit boring