Quick and efficient presentation of material with good surface-level rules of thumb that should serve the majority of people in the majority of instances. This is very effectively delivered.
Whilst teaching conventional statistics this course showed how to utilise them from the sigma viewpoint which provided useful additional perspectives that I can take to my job now.
автор: Sandesh P L ( R - R L•
автор: Sriram P•
автор: Derek T•
Useful course which provides the student with several good tools but the quality of the video lectures is poor with the lecturer having to re-read mistakes. Also, the formulation of the quiz questions (where sometimes a double negative question is asked) is not conducive to a good learner experience.
автор: Jorge T R•
The course doesn't provide too much information. It is based in a book you should have to follow the contents in the course. Contents are not too much developed in the videos. I miss more implication from the teachers to explain concepts and provide examples and analogies.
автор: VISHAL G•
The offered course is really simple and easy to understand. Having said that, I have had experienced in-depth courses on the same topic on other online course platforms at a cheaper price. So, Overall not satisfied with the value for money.
автор: Rasool E•
Week 2 with mathematical tests and practices was the most useful and memorable one to me. other topics were just presented briefly with little examples and therefore won't stay in mind for long.
автор: Kirsten K•
Was a bit harder to follow and the stats sections need updating. There were some errors in the quiz sections and the narrative on the videos could have been more engaging and descriptive.
The content on the slides from professor Cook was not inline to what he was speaking. There were topics on the slide which were not discussed in details.
автор: nicolas b•
There are a lot of tools that were mentioned in this course but weren't given a proper or more in depth explanation than it should have.
This course does not take 4 weeks, especially if you don't have access to the reading material. 3-4h are enough to complete it.
автор: Shailesh K•
An e-book should have been provided and the lectures can be some better. It is not so engaging.
автор: Muhammad S•
you need in this part more clarifications and practical examples to make it more easier for us
автор: Dishank M B•
Subtitles were not matching and method of presentation can be improved
автор: Álvaro B D S•
Doesnt provide the textual material; the subtitles are offsync
some subscript are not in the same speed with the video.
автор: Dwayne S•
The statistic section should have more visual examples.
автор: Edmundo E•
lecture is monotonous. student cant easily drift.
автор: Thelma F T A•
A lot of words in the presentation.
автор: Mahboubeh N M•
I think more detail was required
автор: Erik M•
автор: Junaid K•
автор: Marina T•
Not very structured, too theoretical and not interactive at all. As want to get maximum knowledge of time I spend here I had to read again their sophisticated formulations, try to get the most important points - and it is very boring and not easy. A quiz is usually helping to search the answers and to repeat the material - here it is not the case as the answers are too obvious and stupid. What a shame
автор: Moataz A•
The course relies too much on reading the book. Which is not why we took the course. If we wanted to read the book we could've.
The instructors' presentations are very vague and all they do is just read what's written there... There is no practical assignments or hands-on training.
Overall, the course and the specialization is very weak.
автор: Rupam J S•
The course actually tells us to purchase the book. We don't pay money to just know the name of the book. Please try to increase the lecture time so that we can note down more things without purchasing the book.
автор: Stefan V•
I know it was for a very basic audience, but many of the quizes' answer options were just outright idiotic and childish. Raising the bar wouldn't be a bad thing to do.