Es buen curso

Es una buena introducción a la metodología de la investigación cuantitativa. Muy recomendable

It was a good course, although it could have been better with more practical approach. Thanks!

I recommend it because in did increase my knowledge in social science methods

Good content, good ideas, great examples. The forums were a little abandoned.

Love the videos and the clear explanations of all concepts discussed.

Great course. Broad scope and hones in on important ethical aspects.

A very intensive course. Learnt a lot from the course so far.

Good pacing, good explanations, reasonable expectations.

it's really good for a student in planning department.

Good introduction to statistics and social science.

Interesting and concise. Straight to the point.

Great content and delivered in a clear way.

very good course, well structured!!

effective for me

Excelente!

good

The content provided is of excellent quality, and videos are well explained. I only put 3 stars for 2 reasons. The first one, is that the “peer-reviewing” idea is not a good idea without language requirements to enrol in this course: at least half of the assignments I peer-reviewed were filled with vocabulary and grammar mistakes make it really hard the understand. In many cases as well, the assignments are so filled with mistakes that it is just impossible to understand. I therefore wonder, how such low English skills can permit some of us to read carefully and understand the texts used for the assignments.

The second point, is that in my opinion, the content remains very general. For instance a deeper analysis of each research designs would have been nice.

The course remains however extremely useful for whoever is interested in quantitative reasoning. I would recommend to pair this knowledge with that of books on each topic discussed.

The actual educational value of this course is quite high. The score I can offer it in good faith is dragged down by the additional "assignments" like "Write you own quiz question!" and the expectation to review the quiz questions thought up by other students. Such things in a scientific course are unnecessary and may actually be counterproductive because of the reliance upon other students and their grasp of the material. If they are to remain part of this course, they really should be treated as supplementary and not required to complete the course. It really detracts from the experience for those of us who come here to learn and not to socialize.

It was a well and clearly structured course. Although rich in content, it was enjoyable and useful to complete.

However, the course is missing a contingency plan in case somebody fails a session. Since assessments are peer reviewed, I do not see the motivation of my peers to come back and grade me again - which means I cannot complete the course on time despite, being on time with all assignments.

mechanically it worked pretty well. just a little hard to figger out what's going on and what's important. what needs to be memorized and what just needs to be understood . . .

Just three stars so far, I've just started the course late... I think it looks good tho.

very good course, but I never recieved the feedback I needed on the forum

Fairly good. Fundamental knowledge for researcher.

interesting and informative course.

Over reliance on student grading. Material does not map well to the quizzes.