Chevron Left
Вернуться к Python Programming: A Concise Introduction

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Python Programming: A Concise Introduction от партнера Уэслианский университет

4.7
звезд
Оценки: 4,309
Рецензии: 1,373

О курсе

The goal of the course is to introduce students to Python Version 3.x programming using hands on instruction. It will show how to install Python and use the Spyder IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for writing and debugging programs. The approach will be to present an example followed by a small exercise where the learner tries something similar to solidify a concept. At the end of each module there will be an exercise where the student is required to write simple programs and submit them for grading. It is intended for students with little or no programming background, although students with such a background should be able to move forward at their preferred pace. The course is four modules long and is designed to be completed in four weeks....

Лучшие рецензии

LR
3 янв. 2017 г.

Quite interesting introduction to Python, focusing on the most important components of the language. Looking forward to other courses using the same format. Thank you Bill and team for your hard work.

RR
3 февр. 2020 г.

Thanks for the clear explanations and the easy examples. I think it is a good introductionary course and it gives a good starting point to move further to more sophisticated topics and applications.

Фильтр по:

1326–1350 из 1,350 отзывов о курсе Python Programming: A Concise Introduction

автор: Desabandhu P

6 сент. 2020 г.

First two units were taught well and easy to follow. 3rd and 4th unit were not much experimental and unable to follow up.

автор: ANKITA B

15 июля 2017 г.

This courses is very good as it deals with the basic concepts of python. A perfect course to learn python, for beginners.

автор: Francis G A

21 февр. 2017 г.

Good quick introduction. Very good. Easy to work through the Exercise Sets. Professor typing on he keyboard quite loud.

автор: Piyush S

13 янв. 2020 г.

auto grader was horrible even doing everything correct it won't show correct ..Wasted lot of time because of autograder

автор: Tường A

3 июля 2018 г.

Thanks for this course.It very goodCan you add more subtitle ? Like VietnameseThank you Mr.Bill

автор: David G

25 янв. 2021 г.

Good, but VERY basic introduction. Would have liked more "why" to go along with the doing.

автор: Nishita D

17 июня 2020 г.

Assignment structure and the environment to submit assignments is not user friendly.

автор: Ellissa V

21 авг. 2017 г.

Good starter course, a bit too easy if you are already familiar with programming

автор: SAURABH S

15 февр. 2019 г.

good for basic ... But too basic we needed some advancement in the course

автор: Rajesh B

6 окт. 2017 г.

Decent intro course on Python. It's concise as the title says.

автор: Manan J

18 июня 2020 г.

The course doesn't cover the basic python programming.

автор: Lindsey P

11 авг. 2020 г.

Videos became monotonous over time and hard to watch.

автор: Roger F C

13 июня 2017 г.

Basic course. Basic skills. Good examples

автор: Daniel S d C L

9 нояб. 2020 г.

Useful, it's only so basic

автор: Shashank

19 мая 2020 г.

Slow but informative.

автор: Joshua B

21 мая 2017 г.

Went too fast.

автор: Olajuwon S

24 апр. 2017 г.

Loving It!

автор: Keshav K

28 сент. 2020 г.

Good

автор: Galen M

24 мар. 2021 г.

Good range of material, but not well taught. Concepts were quickly and too poorly developed and explained, especially for someone new to programmingf. The autograder, and it's terse and meaningless feedback, is a total disaster. I found the course to be10% fun learning and 90% total frustration. I would not recommend it.

автор: Christian D

7 нояб. 2016 г.

It was an interesting first experience with Python but it seemed a little bit to easy for me actually. I have been able to complete the hole course on one free day.

автор: Cedric P

11 мар. 2021 г.

I didn't like it so much, the videos were hard to hear and it got really boring when watching them. But the exercises were tough and they were challenging to do.

автор: Kerry S

13 февр. 2017 г.

too basic, wish they had more content

автор: MRUNAL A

29 мая 2020 г.

nice experience

автор: Levi

1 апр. 2017 г.

Too easy.