Отзывы учащихся о курсе Using Python to Access Web Data от партнера Мичиганский университет
О курсе
(рецензий: 256)
(рецензий: 217)
Лучшие рецензии
SM
18 июня 2020 г.
This course was really interesting and did a good job introducing complicated topics in usefully simplified form. It was a pleasure to listen to the instructor and I got everything I wanted out of it.
JM
2 дек. 2016 г.
I have not found an easy way to learn how to code with python language. Mentor are really helpful and Dr Chuck is one of the most self explain professor that I have met in my three university career.
7401–7425 из 7,612 отзывов о курсе Using Python to Access Web Data
автор: Federico C
•17 мая 2018 г.
Still very good! But probably due to the wide subject the concepts are not explained clearly enough.
автор: Paula B
•13 мар. 2018 г.
This was harder than the past two, lost my rhythm a bit too and I don't feel as confident with this.
автор: patel k d
•5 янв. 2018 г.
my knowledge about the internet things is little poor thats why my gric will be lose in this portion
автор: Konstantin K
•10 окт. 2017 г.
A lot about offtopic. Lack of details about python related stuff within socket and web parsing stuff
автор: Asena U
•8 сент. 2016 г.
Not clear examples in the videos. Tests are way different than what the Prof. covers in the videos.
автор: Rajat O
•21 февр. 2019 г.
URLs provided sometimes doesn't show results in urllib.request. Else, things were fine and clear.
автор: Evan M
•14 окт. 2017 г.
Was unnecessarily complex in week 4, 5, 6 trying to gather web based data for the assignments
автор: Javier C
•19 сент. 2020 г.
It was not so interesting/useful as the other Python courses included in the Specialization
автор: Manjunath J
•4 окт. 2020 г.
good course but it was like skimming over the ocean. Wanted a little bit deep information.
автор: Edward A
•24 авг. 2017 г.
the theme of this course is complex and need knowledge in HTTP and Internet architecture.
автор: Ajoy K D
•10 мая 2020 г.
the content was complicated bt the slides problem or slide content was not that detailed
автор: Sarthak S
•16 дек. 2019 г.
It was very quick when it came to APIs made it hard for me to grasp the topics properly.
автор: Grzegorz B
•5 мар. 2016 г.
It is good course, but I would like it to be in the more material and details of Python.
автор: Mark N
•1 сент. 2020 г.
delivery of information is very poor, yet all the respect and appreciation for Dr.Chuck
автор: Guillermo A N G
•10 янв. 2021 г.
The part 1 and 2 is far superior. It is not bad, but it is a lot that was inconcluded.
автор: Nazia H
•27 апр. 2020 г.
The course would be more useful if the content of the videos was explained thoroughly.
автор: LAKSHMI N
•5 мар. 2021 г.
Comparitively I found this course difficult than other courses in the specialization.
автор: Peter A G
•16 мая 2020 г.
Too difficult for beginners or people with minimum programming knowledge like myself.
автор: Akshita B
•15 апр. 2021 г.
The course was fun, but the assignments were much tougher than the course material.
автор: Jon M
•18 дек. 2020 г.
Poos support for xml and json assignments - needed more in depth examples in videos
автор: SIDDHARTH P
•4 авг. 2020 г.
Great experience. Little bit difficult to understand. Requires more focus and time.
автор: Nabeel H
•3 мая 2020 г.
Digs deep into web architectures and web scraping but perhaps a bit too fast-paced.
автор: Deleted A
•11 нояб. 2017 г.
I little confusing it's better to use more real time examples and practice problems
автор: Kushagra
•13 сент. 2018 г.
This Course was quite hard for me and took much time than desired to be completed
автор: shasha l
•11 авг. 2016 г.
There are many details don't explain clearly enough for a beginner to understand.
Coursera Footer
