The course had helped in understanding the concepts of NumPy and pandas. The assignments were so helpful to apply these concepts which provide an in-depth understanding of the Numpy as well as pandans
Wow, this was amazing. Learned a lot (mostly thanks to stack overflow) but the course also opened my eyes to all the possibilities available out there and I feel like i'm only scratching the surface!
автор: Shahriar R D•
The course contents are great but the instructors are not. I struggled a lot and had to watch a lot of tutorials from other places and finally I learned the contents.
автор: Henrique R•
Explanations are superficial, and it relies too heavily on self-learning. For that I can simply check Python's documentation without paying the course's monthly fee.
автор: Miryam V•
There is no helpful guide to the tasks, you don't know the results in advance so you don't know if you are doing well or not.
Tedious and you don't learn anything.
автор: Will W•
This course has many errors and bugs in its materials. I don't know why the administrators refuse to fix it but it comes off as shoddy and poorly managed.
автор: Victoria S•
the lectures are not helpful at all, assignments were organised poorly - there impossible to see mistakes, in other words- go break your head over it
автор: ILLIA S•
Corrupted or outdated data in week 3 and week 4. Hidden tests that fail and you can't get the reason...
Besides of that - the material given is good
автор: Dheeraj a•
The instructor teaches you very liitle and expects you to do thing of your own.It was the worst course i have done until now.The instructor is mad.
автор: Zain R•
The pacing for the course is horrendous, this class quickly becomes impossible to do without looking up answers as the lectures do not help at all
автор: Azima A•
The Course is too general, not going into details of how codes should be written. In order to pass the assignments you need to separately study.
автор: Chris M•
Unclear assignments, lectures are brief and sometimes unclear. Spent more time trying to understand what was being asked than actually learning.
автор: Egbeola A•
The lectures videos were poorly structured, the only good things were the assignment which on its own can teach better than the lecturers
автор: Daniel V•
The course material is good, but the auto-grader does not work properly. Most time on week 3 assignment is debuggin this auto-correcter.
автор: Brian V S•
Very knowledgeable professors, but very little explanation or actual 'teaching'. Graded assignments require a lot of self-education.
автор: rachel l•
Not much information for beginners without a coding background. Assignments are impossible given the video tutorials we have.
автор: Adithya S•
it is very hard for beginners to understand!! More example type teaching is required than simply dictating the theories.
автор: Ravi T•
The instuctor is too slow and the way of teaching could be made more interactive and interesting , like CS50 of Harvard
автор: Allen T•
Time spent != Learning Benefit. Assignment #3 is a waste of time. Week 3 Lecture and assignment #3 were unrelated.
автор: Diwakar S•
teacher is good but talks way too fast. hard to follow especially data science concepts at that speed
автор: Vishnu S K•
The Class is too fast and not explained in an understandable manner. Programming is also very fast.
автор: Lovish b•
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY IT ALWAYS KEEPS REJECTING MY WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT. WELL I AM NOT TRYING AGAIN NOW
автор: Shailvi S•
Not an introductory course. They don't even teach like you're a beginner. Very very unsatisfied.
автор: Priata N•
Not a very good instructor or course. Course topics are good. I had to learn from other sources.
автор: Xavier P C•
Very poor material compared to what you are asked to do on the assignments. A waste of money
My project is stuck because of silly code validation, can some one look into it urgently
автор: Santiago T J•
The content they give in the videos is not enough to perform the tasks they propose.