Jul 09, 2018
Instructors, material and course structure were great! Only wish I could take this class with a friend to push me to work faster and smarter. Learned a lot from this class.
Mar 16, 2017
A good follow up to the first part, I found the testing section particularly useful. I could only wish the course was longer and delved deeper into Classes and Exceptions.
автор: Heba I•
Mar 19, 2019
It's concise , handy and well explained .
It covers a lot of areas in sw development ,and included some imp terminologies that i didn't know , but when i googled it i found it's pretty popular in sw world .
автор: Abdulrahman M•
Jan 28, 2018
Great course! I recommend it for beginner in python programming
автор: Ard S•
Mar 15, 2019
This strengths of this course were also it weaknesses; while I enjoyed this course more than the first one due to the introduction of a wider variety of topics (basic algorithms, OOP, etcetera) it also felt less coherent in its approach in the sense that I missed an overarching concept or arc that tied all the modules together, which IMO is where the first module shined. Interesting and educative nevertheless.
автор: Alberto P•
Sep 09, 2018
The course was great, I enjoyed it less than the first part though. I feel there was way more support from the mentors and the forums in the first part, whereas in this edition there was almost nobody posting around and helping. Still, as the other one great teaching from both professors and great content. Thank you!
автор: Zzm S•
Sep 28, 2018
Topics are well chosen. I think the content is practical and not superficial for work. I appreciate the instructors' work. They are very clear and logic is easy to follow. I would suggest there to be more code assignment for practice. I personally think the content is good but not enough. This course is more like a 3 -week course.
автор: Abhishek S•
Jul 02, 2017
This course primarily focuses on best practices for writing programs(in python). One also gets to learn basic sorting and searching algorithms. It briefly touches upon the concepts of classes, exceptions etc. Along the journey you'll also learn some tricks with python. Overall it was a fantastic experience. I hope UofT comes out with a third course in this series - Learn to Program which will go into much more detail especially in concepts such as object oriented programming, exception handling etc.
автор: Ashwani k G•
Apr 28, 2017
Wonderful course. Got to learn many things.
автор: HU X•
Jun 12, 2017
very basic stuff and very easy.
автор: Branimir L•
Apr 09, 2017
It does not fulfills completely its title 'Crafting Quality Code'. Nevertheless, it does pay attention to unit testing and taking care of the design via design recipes.
автор: Ikseon K•
Feb 01, 2018
Thanks to lecturer's clear and easy explanation, I completed this coursework after LTP1, Learn to Program: Fundamentals. I really appreciate it for two great teachers' enthusiasm and kindness. Throughout this coursework, I can find the big picture of Python programming world. Thanks! Also, hope anybody else will enjoy the programming through this great coursework!
автор: Irina K•
Mar 24, 2017
Quite simple course for those, who has already learned some python, but has some drawbacks in knowledge of unit testing, exceptions and classes. All examples are understandable and simple.
Although expected more about quality code crafting, some hints and best practices, that could help in real life of the developer.
автор: Benoit I•
Mar 26, 2017
Very interresting course for Python lovers.
автор: Li H Y•
Jun 27, 2017
Overall it is a very great course. The material is well-structured and worth to learn.
This course worth 4 stars but not 5 because the instructors seldom answer questions in the forum. Fellow students need to help each other and sometimes there is no help from everyone.
автор: Thai S C•
Jun 13, 2017
Look like not many people around, no one do peer review for my assignment
автор: Seha I O•
Jan 26, 2018
автор: Oliver F•
Sep 20, 2017
It's a nice course with good videos. Since it's very basic, anyone with little programming experience should be able to pass this course. Even without any knowledge of Python, the course is manageable.
To improve the videos, I'd recommend to adjust the audio levels, since some parts are spoken louder than others. Nevertheless, I've been able to understand everything.
автор: Christian B M•
Mar 20, 2017
Good course, especially the doc and unit testing parts. I had hoped for a more advanced implementations, but thank you for mentioning the exec function.
автор: Thuan M•
Oct 26, 2017
As a follow-up course to The University of Toronto's Fundamentals of Programming, this course is a natural progression. As a second-level course, more is expected of the learner. The challenges offered by the instructors are more rigorous than an intro course. The quizzes can be tricky as well, so for someone seeing the material for the first time, these questions will require insight and thought to come up with the solution. Jennifer Campbell and Paul Gries are good instructors who try to emphasis the importance of the process of a programmer. The course structure itself does not seem to follow one another week to week and seems to be extra topics in programming not covered in Fundamentals. The course covers doctest and unittest, classes, search and sorting algorithms, object-oriented programming, and exceptions. The topics on classes and object-oriented programming are excellent and recommended to truly have a grasp of Python.
Sep 29, 2018
автор: jbene m•
Aug 21, 2019
Very practical. I have learned a lot from this course.
автор: Mikhail G•
Feb 18, 2019
It is better to have more bite-sized assignments than the last one
автор: Bohdan S•
Nov 06, 2017
Incorrect tasks. Many problems.
автор: Olajuwon S•
Apr 24, 2017
автор: Rey O•
Jul 01, 2017
It would've been better that these very long read exercises be put into a programming exercise. Being presented with a couple of correct answers (but inefficient) takes a lot of time for us to figure it out. If you guys really insist on this kind of exercises, it's better to give us 3 or maybe 4 correct answers and we choose what we think is the most efficient one. That way, if we got the wrong answer, it's our job as why our chosen answer is not the most efficient one.
автор: Sergio I G E•
Jun 25, 2019
Good course, but not everything was well explained, and the mentors didn't show up.