Chevron Left
Вернуться к Практическое компьютерное обучение

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Практическое компьютерное обучение от партнера Университет Джонса Хопкинса

4.5
звезд
Оценки: 3,170
Рецензии: 607

О курсе

One of the most common tasks performed by data scientists and data analysts are prediction and machine learning. This course will cover the basic components of building and applying prediction functions with an emphasis on practical applications. The course will provide basic grounding in concepts such as training and tests sets, overfitting, and error rates. The course will also introduce a range of model based and algorithmic machine learning methods including regression, classification trees, Naive Bayes, and random forests. The course will cover the complete process of building prediction functions including data collection, feature creation, algorithms, and evaluation....

Лучшие рецензии

MR
13 авг. 2020 г.

recommended for all the 21st centuary students who might be intrested to play with data in future or some kind of work related to make predictions systemically must have good knowledge of this course

AD
28 февр. 2017 г.

Issues of every stage of the construction of learning machine model, as well as issues with several different machine learning methods are well and in fine yet very understandable detail explained.

Фильтр по:

501–525 из 598 отзывов о курсе Практическое компьютерное обучение

автор: Aki T

9 дек. 2019 г.

Unfortunately, I didn't think this topic was as good as the other courses in the Specialisation. Quizzes often references aspect that haven't been discussed during the lessons, and the lessons itselves are often too high-level (although I reckon this is why the course is called "Practical", and we might need several courses to thorough fully understand how each algorithm works).

автор: Matias T

6 апр. 2016 г.

In my view the course was useful but not as good as the previus ones I followed in the specializacion (such as regression models and stat. inference).

The subject was too broad and there was no space to cover in detail all the algorithms. Also I think it's a bit out of date because there is no references to xgbboost which is now dominating many Kaggle contests

автор: Christopher B

28 февр. 2017 г.

While the overview of the content seemed very reasonable both in scope and pacing, the lack of swirl exercises meant that the final project for the course was a bit jostling. Overall, I think this course still needs some development in the way of exercises to familiarize the student with the practical exercises associated with machine learning.

автор: Gulsevi R

23 сент. 2016 г.

Lectures are too complicated. I understand that material is not easy and one should do a lot of research and reading to understand the essence of the taught algorithms but the lecturer is also not very helpful and assignments are everywhere on the internet which nobody needs to get tired of thinking a little to do the homework as their product.

автор: Romain F

2 сент. 2017 г.

Like all courses in the specialization, good introduction to statistical learning, although a bit rushed off.

The learner has to navigate through the arcanes of r packages, which is not always easy. I am also quite surprised that neural networks are not part of the course, it should be disclaimed in the course content.

автор: Rok B

8 авг. 2019 г.

The material is well choosem but poorly explained. This course among all would need swirl excercises, or just more excercises in any form. Instead the lecturer rushes through the material. So in the end you do have some overview about machine learning in R but not enough hands on experie

автор: Martin W

23 июня 2021 г.

Breadth of content covered (different ML algos) is great but is very cursory. Would be interesting to dig deeper into diagnosing random forests.

Quizzes are poor as built against old versions of R so you have to waste time setting up the environment to get the expected results.

автор: Matthias H

26 мар. 2016 г.

The quizes do not match a 100% with the lecture videos. There are some weird questions. My algorithms' outputs deviate from answers some times, which is due to different software versions. Quizes are not very educating this time. Courses by Brian Caffo were much better.

автор: Fernando M

3 февр. 2016 г.

Class materials and videos are confusing and do not go into enough detail. Assignments require a lot of search of extra information outside course materials. Also, the length that is needed to complete the assignments vary widely week to week.

автор: Eric S

5 июля 2020 г.

Weakest class in the Data Science Specialization so far. Don't expect to leave with a deep understanding of the machine learning techniques covered in this course. You will get practice using the caret package in R, which is very useful.

автор: Ada

14 нояб. 2016 г.

Although again very interesting, I found the lack of additional materials such as practical exercises, swirls and a book reduced the depth of the course knowledge for me. Maybe we have been spoiled by the previous courses :-)

автор: Ivana L

24 февр. 2016 г.

Compared to previous two courses in specialization this one is far worse - it is more of excursion into used methods than actual learning using any of mentioned methods in enough detail to be able to do meaningful analyses.

автор: CHEN X

2 дек. 2015 г.

Feels like everything is solved using a caret package, while the back-end theory is only slightly touched. By using a single line command solver, student may lack the foundation for harder problems in the real world.

автор: Daniel J R

17 янв. 2019 г.

Seems like a lot to pack into 4 -weeks. Should really be named introductory machine learning. Needs more depth and better development of the intuitions associated to each algorithm class to match the expectations.

автор: Ayushmaan D V

16 авг. 2020 г.

The material covered was good and informative, the reference material was nice. But the video leactures themselves were lacking in many respects. The videos covered only a bare minimum and could have been longer.

автор: Vinay K S

19 февр. 2017 г.

I like initial courses like Exploratory Data Analysis but later on it got harder to follow the lectures. A lot of topics were just rushed through and little effort was made to make them engaging or interesting.

автор: Andrew W

13 мар. 2018 г.

Very interesting subject area, I think there is simply too much to cram into one course. Should consider spliting the subject into 2 courese or simply concentrate on only 1 or 2 main areas (e.g. cla

автор: Andrew W

9 февр. 2017 г.

The videos are really tutorials on R functions for machine learning and data wrangling. A good substitute for "Machine Learning" by Andrew Ng in terms of managing data sets and exploratory analysis.

автор: M. D

11 июля 2020 г.

Content somewhat outdated. Referenced packages don't always work in current version of R. Material can be better explained with more detailed discussion of examples rather than theory.

автор: Rob C

1 авг. 2017 г.

This course needs swirl assignments. I did fine on the quizzes and assignments, but I only feel like I learned a minimal amount of machine learning, even practical machine learning.

автор: Raul M

12 февр. 2019 г.

The class is good but it is too simple. I expected the professor will provide more detail about the models. This is just an introduction and weak for a specialization.

автор: Brian F

15 авг. 2017 г.

There was some good material in here, but it was rushed and is deserving of a much longer course - especially compared to some of the other modules in this course.

автор: Chuxing C

5 февр. 2016 г.

the lack of assisted practices made it harder to digest the contents and methodologies.

strongly suggest to develop some practice problems with explanations.

автор: Michalis F

26 мая 2017 г.

Good in introducing caret package and getting some experience in running algorithms. Was expecting more in-depth discussion about the methods though.

автор: Davin G

26 авг. 2019 г.

It's an excellent crash course to machine learning but the stats part was rushed. Had to look up external resources to understand what was going on.