Chevron Left
Вернуться к Введение в математическое мышление

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Введение в математическое мышление от партнера Стэнфордский университет

4.8
звезд
Оценки: 2,022
Рецензии: 482

О курсе

Learn how to think the way mathematicians do – a powerful cognitive process developed over thousands of years. Mathematical thinking is not the same as doing mathematics – at least not as mathematics is typically presented in our school system. School math typically focuses on learning procedures to solve highly stereotyped problems. Professional mathematicians think a certain way to solve real problems, problems that can arise from the everyday world, or from science, or from within mathematics itself. The key to success in school math is to learn to think inside-the-box. In contrast, a key feature of mathematical thinking is thinking outside-the-box – a valuable ability in today’s world. This course helps to develop that crucial way of thinking....

Лучшие рецензии

AM
23 нояб. 2019 г.

It was an amazing course! Lots of interesting content. The content is also explained really well, i found it really easy to understand. The assessments are a little challenging, but reasonably sized.

PD
29 июня 2020 г.

It has help evaluate what I put into decision in any applicable context. Since I've noted what decision I make and how outcome can be made to vary when I consider all components in a isolated manner.

Фильтр по:

451–465 из 465 отзывов о курсе Введение в математическое мышление

автор: Nicholas K

8 июня 2019 г.

Good course.

автор: prakash s

28 авг. 2018 г.

nice course.

автор: MOYILLA N K T

14 мая 2018 г.

very good

автор: Mitul D

3 авг. 2019 г.

best

автор: thuonghien

8 окт. 2018 г.

good

автор: Almaz

29 дек. 2017 г.

completely disagree with evaluation exercises as it allows to get >= 12 points for completely wrong solution. It's better to use [0,7] based system as used in IMO. it makes more sense and checks problem solving, not ability to bullshit

автор: Digby D

12 дек. 2017 г.

A more mathematical approach to Formal Logic. Good alternative to Intro to Logic (also from Stanford) for STEM students if they don't like the format of Intro to Logic.

автор: Zhenqin L

19 дек. 2017 г.

老师很幽默。讲的很细致,可是没人最后改我的作业,以后不交钱了。

автор: zjm2017

4 мар. 2017 г.

useful

автор: zarghonaHussainzada

30 авг. 2020 г.

all the videos and quiz are lock

автор: Yonatan G

3 июля 2017 г.

Tengo Problemas con la traducción al Español, me notificaron que este curso tenia subtitulo en español me voy a dar baja.

автор: Aldo J M V

23 дек. 2019 г.

I disagree with the way the rubrics are designed. It should be called "think as I do"

автор: Santiago N M

30 авг. 2018 г.

no entendi nada no sabe explicar y ademas es vejo y blanco....

автор: gamey p

20 мая 2020 г.

It's fail course it's a wasting for time

автор: Arnold W

11 окт. 2020 г.

cant fucking unenrol