1 дек. 2020 г.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
22 нояб. 2017 г.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
автор: BO F•
14 янв. 2022 г.
The exam's some question aren't consisted in the course. It's a bad learning experience compared with the previous two course.
автор: Matías L M•
29 окт. 2017 г.
Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(
автор: kedar p•
18 июля 2018 г.
This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.
автор: Viliam R•
21 окт. 2017 г.
i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.
автор: Vishal K•
17 дек. 2017 г.
The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.
автор: Benoit D•
15 авг. 2017 г.
I have been working in industry for 5 years now and this are not really the problems we encounter in practice.
автор: Mads E H•
26 окт. 2017 г.
Not applicable enough. I think you need more tooling around DL before these meta lectures makes sense.
автор: Dafydd S•
23 окт. 2017 г.
Had the feeling of a "filler" course although it was interesting to hear about the various challenges
автор: Alexander V•
25 февр. 2018 г.
A lot of very common-place suggestions that could just as easily be conveyed in a third of the time.
автор: Nahuel S R•
4 мар. 2020 г.
Demasiado contenido teórico sin aplicaciones prácticas reales que permitan consolidar lo aprendido
автор: Peter E•
2 мая 2018 г.
Too theoretical. It would be good to have some practical (programming) assignments here as well.
автор: Mohamed E•
22 нояб. 2017 г.
Not much to learn in this course, basic recommendations can be condensed in one or two lectures
автор: Jordi T A•
28 авг. 2017 г.
A lot of the content seemed redundant both within the lectures and with the previous courses
автор: Clement K•
11 мая 2020 г.
Interesting but redundant. It's not worth an entire course, even if it's only two weeks
автор: Péter D•
6 окт. 2017 г.
long videos saying actually very little ... disappointment
автор: Andrey L•
29 окт. 2017 г.
Quite boring and not so interactive like the first course
автор: harsh s•
22 сент. 2020 г.
good but more theoretical course rather than pratical
автор: Kaarthik S•
25 мая 2020 г.
this is the boring course in the specialization
автор: Thomas A•
2 окт. 2019 г.
Can be better, but there's way too much fluff
автор: Till R•
2 мар. 2019 г.
Some things are best learned from experience.
автор: Subhadeep R•
25 сент. 2018 г.
Frankly I didn't find this to be very useful.
автор: Hernan F D•
17 дек. 2019 г.
There is no a lot of content in this course
автор: Aloys N•
20 сент. 2019 г.
Missing a bit of practical Python exercises
автор: Ofer G•
9 июля 2019 г.
Pretty basic and not enough practical
автор: 2k19ec173 s•
4 апр. 2021 г.
please work on the audio quality