The exam's some question aren't consisted in the course. It's a bad learning experience compared with the previous two course.

Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(

This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.

i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.

The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.

I have been working in industry for 5 years now and this are not really the problems we encounter in practice.

Not applicable enough. I think you need more tooling around DL before these meta lectures makes sense.

Had the feeling of a "filler" course although it was interesting to hear about the various challenges

A lot of very common-place suggestions that could just as easily be conveyed in a third of the time.

Demasiado contenido teórico sin aplicaciones prácticas reales que permitan consolidar lo aprendido

Too theoretical. It would be good to have some practical (programming) assignments here as well.

Not much to learn in this course, basic recommendations can be condensed in one or two lectures

A lot of the content seemed redundant both within the lectures and with the previous courses

Interesting but redundant. It's not worth an entire course, even if it's only two weeks

long videos saying actually very little ... disappointment

Quite boring and not so interactive like the first course

good but more theoretical course rather than pratical

this is the boring course in the specialization

Can be better, but there's way too much fluff

Some things are best learned from experience.

Frankly I didn't find this to be very useful.

There is no a lot of content in this course

Missing a bit of practical Python exercises

Pretty basic and not enough practical

please work on the audio quality