I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
While the information from this course was awesome I would've liked some hand on projects to get the information running. Nonetheless, the two simulation task were the best (more would've been neat!).
автор: Ted S•
Doesn't look like it was checked for quality control (e.g. Videos with bad takes), Ng rambles sometimes so that it seems as if he is filling time, there are no knowledge checks. This course wasn't ready. Case study flight simulators are good, but poorly introduced.
автор: Tiffanie B•
The teacher seemed to not have a clear idea of what all he needed to say in the video and verbally flailed somewhat, and many times seemed to be adding things purely for the sake of padding video length. Don't waste my time. The content was mildly useful.
автор: HAMM,CHRISTOPHER A•
I need a lot more practice than is offered here. I would also strongly prefer if the instruction followed some of the best practice laid out in books such as "How Learning Works" because I have difficulty following the instructor's line of reasoning.
автор: Leonardo M R•
Answers in the multiple choice seems incomplete for me, I don't necessary agree with the answers presented unless more detail on some context (that I don't think we should assume) is present for the questions.
автор: Пильгуй В Л•
This course is good, but here is so few practice. This is hard to understand without practice. Looks like I didn't understand many problems in this course. Need more explanation, more samples, more practice.
автор: David L•
Zero programming assignments, but simple quizzes that will make whatever you just learned as fleeting as the morning dew on a hot summer's day. Too bad, because otherwise the material is quite interesting.
автор: Mahesh B K•
Although important, i think this should be the last course in the specialisation as it covers the harder parts of handling various errors and their causes before knowing how these models are trained
автор: Nikolay B•
the best course in so far, not that much theory but a lot of "insides" from the field. However, still no practice, Im studying for 3 month and still have no idea how to create a real application.
автор: Bradley D•
There's theory, but, without practice and application in my opinion. I did not like it because it seems to be easily forgotten seeing that I did not associate with practical excercises.
автор: Matthew J C•
Most (if not all) of the information covered in this module was covered, perhaps with a little less depth, in the previous modules. However, it's probably worth repeating.
автор: John H•
Poor video editing. Not enough graded material to feel confident that I fully understand the concepts proposed in the lectures. Definite step backwards from courses 1-2.
автор: Aayush S•
Could be better in terms of the concept taught. A course I would prefer as the last one in the specialization. Week 2 Material is good but whole course is too slow.
автор: Mikael B•
This course had a much less ambitious scope than the previous two courses and I think that the programming assignments are very important to help me learn properly.
автор: Artem M•
Too much information in too little time. Additionally, all information is mostly practical, and having no real exercises makes it hard to remember all the details.
автор: Haim K•
The course should be much shorter (e.g. half a week). The messages are pretty straightforward and could have been passed in one quarter of the time.
автор: Iscru-Togan C T•
The videos are to long and it presents some topics purely hipothetical. You basically spend a couple of hours without developing any useful skill
I still feel a little confused when I have so many options to improve my NN. This course is less clearly taught than the two former to this one!
автор: Saad K•
I found it quite verbose... Could have easily been shrunk and fit inside the other course... Don't think it needs a separate course for this
автор: Matías L M•
Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(
автор: kedar p•
This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.
автор: Viliam R•
i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.
автор: Vishal K•
The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.
автор: Benoit D•
I have been working in industry for 5 years now and this are not really the problems we encounter in practice.
автор: Mads E H•
Not applicable enough. I think you need more tooling around DL before these meta lectures makes sense.
автор: Dafydd S•
Had the feeling of a "filler" course although it was interesting to hear about the various challenges