30 мар. 2020 г.
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
22 нояб. 2017 г.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
автор: Ted S•
19 дек. 2017 г.
Doesn't look like it was checked for quality control (e.g. Videos with bad takes), Ng rambles sometimes so that it seems as if he is filling time, there are no knowledge checks. This course wasn't ready. Case study flight simulators are good, but poorly introduced.
автор: Tiffanie B•
18 окт. 2019 г.
The teacher seemed to not have a clear idea of what all he needed to say in the video and verbally flailed somewhat, and many times seemed to be adding things purely for the sake of padding video length. Don't waste my time. The content was mildly useful.
автор: Goudout E•
4 июля 2022 г.
I give only 2/5 because of the quizzes being waaay too debatable, and sometimes frankly inaccurate. Also, many questions and answers also still have typos (missing letters, missing WORDS even).
There's lots of interesting things to learn still, thanks!
автор: HAMM,CHRISTOPHER A•
7 мая 2018 г.
I need a lot more practice than is offered here. I would also strongly prefer if the instruction followed some of the best practice laid out in books such as "How Learning Works" because I have difficulty following the instructor's line of reasoning.
автор: Leonardo M R•
27 мая 2018 г.
Answers in the multiple choice seems incomplete for me, I don't necessary agree with the answers presented unless more detail on some context (that I don't think we should assume) is present for the questions.
автор: Пильгуй В Л•
3 дек. 2019 г.
This course is good, but here is so few practice. This is hard to understand without practice. Looks like I didn't understand many problems in this course. Need more explanation, more samples, more practice.
автор: David L•
22 мая 2018 г.
Zero programming assignments, but simple quizzes that will make whatever you just learned as fleeting as the morning dew on a hot summer's day. Too bad, because otherwise the material is quite interesting.
автор: Mahesh B K•
30 апр. 2020 г.
Although important, i think this should be the last course in the specialisation as it covers the harder parts of handling various errors and their causes before knowing how these models are trained
автор: Nikolay B•
26 окт. 2017 г.
the best course in so far, not that much theory but a lot of "insides" from the field. However, still no practice, Im studying for 3 month and still have no idea how to create a real application.
автор: Bradley D•
15 июня 2019 г.
There's theory, but, without practice and application in my opinion. I did not like it because it seems to be easily forgotten seeing that I did not associate with practical excercises.
автор: Matthew C•
7 мар. 2018 г.
Most (if not all) of the information covered in this module was covered, perhaps with a little less depth, in the previous modules. However, it's probably worth repeating.
автор: John H I•
21 сент. 2018 г.
Poor video editing. Not enough graded material to feel confident that I fully understand the concepts proposed in the lectures. Definite step backwards from courses 1-2.
автор: Aayush S•
19 июля 2020 г.
Could be better in terms of the concept taught. A course I would prefer as the last one in the specialization. Week 2 Material is good but whole course is too slow.
автор: Mikael B•
13 сент. 2017 г.
This course had a much less ambitious scope than the previous two courses and I think that the programming assignments are very important to help me learn properly.
автор: Artem M•
23 апр. 2018 г.
Too much information in too little time. Additionally, all information is mostly practical, and having no real exercises makes it hard to remember all the details.
автор: Haim K•
3 июля 2020 г.
The course should be much shorter (e.g. half a week). The messages are pretty straightforward and could have been passed in one quarter of the time.
автор: Iscru-Togan C T•
12 дек. 2020 г.
The videos are to long and it presents some topics purely hipothetical. You basically spend a couple of hours without developing any useful skill
27 янв. 2019 г.
I still feel a little confused when I have so many options to improve my NN. This course is less clearly taught than the two former to this one!
автор: Saad K•
12 сент. 2017 г.
I found it quite verbose... Could have easily been shrunk and fit inside the other course... Don't think it needs a separate course for this
автор: Stephen E•
30 июля 2022 г.
The quiz questions were often vague enough that it was easy to justify wrong answers using specific reasoning from the lessons.
автор: BO F•
14 янв. 2022 г.
The exam's some question aren't consisted in the course. It's a bad learning experience compared with the previous two course.
автор: Matías L M•
29 окт. 2017 г.
Really bad course. Even the professor does a good job at explaining everything, it does not seem to be a technical course :(
автор: kedar p•
18 июля 2018 г.
This course is too theoretical, would like to see some multi task learning or transfer learning programming assignments.
автор: Viliam R•
21 окт. 2017 г.
i missed practical (programming) assignments here. quizes are great, but could never substitute for getting hands dirty.
автор: Vishal K•
17 дек. 2017 г.
The weakest of the three so far - comparatively lots of fluff. Unclear definitions with lots of perhapses and maybes.