1 июля 2020 г.
While the information from this course was awesome I would've liked some hand on projects to get the information running. Nonetheless, the two simulation task were the best (more would've been neat!).
30 мар. 2020 г.
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
автор: Hugo J•
2 нояб. 2020 г.
It's easy and more simple than the others in specialization. Can be more deeper into ML project organization management. It's ok, could be better!
автор: Jordon B•
31 янв. 2018 г.
This course did not contain programming assignments, only quizzes, and was thus considerably less useful, even though the knowledge was important.
12 окт. 2017 г.
Quite some questions are confusing and some are not correct itself. and this course is more concept based, didn't actually get to program a lot.
автор: Giacomo A•
28 янв. 2018 г.
Contains some useful tips, but they are a bit too diluted - I feel like it could have lasted much less and still conveyed the same information.
автор: Yancey S•
25 сент. 2018 г.
This course provides some interesting insights into how to approach machine learning projects, but feels a little light on substance at times.
автор: Even G•
20 окт. 2017 г.
Great content. Some strange audio that I think should've been cut (especially in week 2). I suspect the week 2 quiz is a little buggy as well.
автор: Mayur S•
25 мая 2020 г.
The course material can be clubbed with existing courses. It would have been much more meaningful with some examples and hands-on assignments
автор: Rindra R•
11 окт. 2017 г.
Covered important topics and real-world project considerations. However, the content and assignments are too short to make it a full course.
автор: Daniel S•
25 июня 2020 г.
This time it was not that well-structured than the previous courses. I thought we would learn how to structure step by step an ML project.
автор: José G•
18 апр. 2020 г.
Lots of information, few knowledge
Change name to "Struc. Deep Learning Projects", all other forms of ML not considered, specially for P2.
автор: Eric K•
21 июля 2018 г.
Too much similar material to the prior course, and only two simple quizzes, no hands-on programming assignments like in earlier courses.
автор: Eric M•
20 окт. 2017 г.
A fundamentally very good course with a few technical gltiches that can be easily corrected and some confusing elements to be clarified.
автор: Steve K•
21 мая 2018 г.
I think this lecture is important for every research scientist. However, there was no programming examples so I was confused sometimes.
автор: Michael L•
1 мая 2018 г.
No programming assignments or labs, so too much theory, and too little chance to put same into practice. Not a good value for my money.
автор: Max S•
13 дек. 2017 г.
Still good but getting much sloppier. Bad editing of the videos, some exercises plain wrong and staff not reacting to forum posts, etc.
автор: Xiang L•
26 апр. 2021 г.
This session might not be very helpful for people from different backgrounds such as non-industral level application of deep learning.
автор: Lars L•
30 дек. 2017 г.
Course materials need some cleanup. Were a number of audio blips, in the video. Material was good but just didn't seem as polished.
автор: Nitin S•
25 июня 2020 г.
Decent learning. Though quite some stuff, I felt as repetitive and obvious.
I wish there was some programming exposure as well here
автор: Taavi K•
29 нояб. 2017 г.
Too short on its own (took half a day to go through the whole thing), could have been combined with Course 2 of the specialization.
автор: Farid A•
18 июля 2022 г.
- could have been better with more hands-on excerices or assignments.
- the assignments were quite hard compared to the lectures
автор: Jean-Michel P•
29 июня 2021 г.
I feel like this course should be broken down and included in the other courses to get better context within these other courses.
автор: Raghu t D•
6 авг. 2018 г.
this session was good it would be more better if they provided the code of them..so that we could be abke to learn more from them
автор: Denys G•
23 нояб. 2017 г.
Felt a bit rushed, each video was full of good tips but personally I think each video should have been a jupyternotebook instead.
автор: Massimo A•
18 нояб. 2017 г.
More theoretical than the other courses in the specialisation but still very high quality.
Short but with a lot of information.