1 дек. 2020 г.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
30 мар. 2020 г.
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
автор: Pejman M•
21 окт. 2017 г.
Programming practices with TensorFlow should have continued in this course. Unfortunately, these two weeks were all talking.
автор: Nithin V•
3 янв. 2021 г.
Need more quizzes, assignments to deepen the understanding, But otherwise thank you Andrew Ng for presenting this material
автор: Panos K•
18 апр. 2021 г.
The pace of the first part of the course was too slow. The second part (from Transfer learning onwards) was much better.
автор: Mustafa H•
16 июля 2018 г.
This course does discuss interesting and important subjects but I feel it can be combined with course 2 of this series
автор: Ahmed A•
10 июля 2018 г.
course is very good have a lot of important theory, it will be amazing if become 3 weeks with programming assignments.
автор: Kevin Q•
19 мар. 2018 г.
lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses
автор: Arghya R•
19 сент. 2017 г.
Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better
автор: Okhtay A•
5 апр. 2020 г.
A bit too free form compared to the other courses in deep learning specialization, but maybe that was the goal.
автор: Masih B•
18 июля 2020 г.
This course could be way more better, if it also focused on codeing with tensorflow (like the previous course)
автор: Janet C•
29 июня 2019 г.
Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.
автор: Aniruddh B•
16 апр. 2020 г.
Very nice, but I don't believe the content merits a full course. It could be integrated with courses 1 and 2.
28 февр. 2018 г.
To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.
автор: Rob W•
12 мая 2018 г.
Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.
автор: Idan P•
28 мая 2018 г.
Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".
Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".
автор: Abd-Elrahman B•
21 дек. 2017 г.
The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.
автор: Rishabh B•
3 янв. 2020 г.
Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.
автор: Barnoviciu E•
18 янв. 2021 г.
Filled like it could be condensed in a lot less, probably a filler to fill the 5 courses "requirement??"
автор: Tim U•
11 янв. 2020 г.
More quizzes or scenario-based examples or exercises at the end in coding. This felt thin in content.
автор: Iam P d S•
14 мар. 2018 г.
This course was shorter and didn't have any programming assignments. Could've been part of course 2.
автор: Aswin R•
7 мая 2020 г.
Didn't turn out to be much useful. Could've added more content or added as a part of other courses.
автор: Yue E•
7 мар. 2019 г.
Unfortunately, it did not match with my expectations, too much theory and no programming exercises.
автор: Isaraparb L•
15 июля 2018 г.
The early part rather feels slow and repetitive. The course's content seems very important though.
автор: MEKALA S N•
29 апр. 2020 г.
The videos are too lengthy, getting bored while watching them.Better reduce the length of videos.
автор: Vladislav Z•
8 окт. 2017 г.
Have mixed feeling about this one.
It is more like one week course - to few materials for 2 week.
автор: Thomas B•
22 окт. 2017 г.
It would have been really nice to have some project work on this one instead of just quizzes.