I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
автор: Mustafa H•
This course does discuss interesting and important subjects but I feel it can be combined with course 2 of this series
автор: Ahmed A•
course is very good have a lot of important theory, it will be amazing if become 3 weeks with programming assignments.
автор: Kevin Q•
lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses
автор: Arghya R•
Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better
автор: Okhtay A•
A bit too free form compared to the other courses in deep learning specialization, but maybe that was the goal.
автор: Masih B•
This course could be way more better, if it also focused on codeing with tensorflow (like the previous course)
автор: Janet C•
Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.
автор: Aniruddh B•
Very nice, but I don't believe the content merits a full course. It could be integrated with courses 1 and 2.
To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.
автор: Rob W•
Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.
автор: Idan P•
Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".
Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".
автор: Abd-Elrahman B•
The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.
автор: Rishabh B•
Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.
автор: Barnoviciu E•
Filled like it could be condensed in a lot less, probably a filler to fill the 5 courses "requirement??"
автор: Tim U•
More quizzes or scenario-based examples or exercises at the end in coding. This felt thin in content.
автор: Iam P d S•
This course was shorter and didn't have any programming assignments. Could've been part of course 2.
автор: Aswin R•
Didn't turn out to be much useful. Could've added more content or added as a part of other courses.
автор: Yue E•
Unfortunately, it did not match with my expectations, too much theory and no programming exercises.
автор: Isaraparb L•
The early part rather feels slow and repetitive. The course's content seems very important though.
автор: MEKALA S N•
The videos are too lengthy, getting bored while watching them.Better reduce the length of videos.
автор: Vladislav Z•
Have mixed feeling about this one.
It is more like one week course - to few materials for 2 week.
автор: Thomas B•
It would have been really nice to have some project work on this one instead of just quizzes.
автор: Shivam K S•
Could have been more in depth or could have been added to another course as one extra week
автор: Gowdhaman S•
The course content was great and it is more theoretical. Kindly add hands-on or projects.
автор: Joseph D•
Helpful guidance but I didn't get enough material to help *me* generalize what I learned.