I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
It is very nice to have a very experienced deep learning practitioner showing you the "magic" of making DNN works. That is usually passed from Professor to graduate student, but is available here now.
автор: Akshay S
•It was very theoretical and subjective.
It would be useful if the learner has some more experience in DNN than currently expected.
But I definitely enjoyed 2nd week of the course.
автор: Andrew C
•Interesting content, but lacking in real work. As with all of the deeplearning.ai courses thus far, the multiple choice questions are frequently ambiguous and poorly worded.
автор: Zsolt K
•The information is really basic, most of it is self explanatory. This shouldn't be a course on its own, rather maybe a week/half weeks worth of material in another course.
автор: Sherif A
•This course is too subjective. Andrew shares his experience in a structured way in the lecture. However, I feel that correct structuring decisions need to be brainstormed.
автор: Patrick F
•Seeing different practical use scenarios and adaptions is fine but it got pretty boring without a real application to tune. The Quizzes on the other hand were very good!
автор: Alberto S
•Although everything taught is relevant, it was too much theoretical. And some of the evaluation questions are not clear (well, at least for non native English speakers).
автор: Daniel V
•Generally useful skills, but the contents partially overlap with previous courses and the overall quality doesn't match the previous courses (eg poor video mastering).
автор: Davide C
•The course was interesting, but in my opinion too theoretical. I preferred the first 2 courses with Python programming. I am now looking forward to the next 2 courses.
автор: Felipe L d S
•Even though some of the content is useful, I feel like this course should be merged with the second one. There is not new information enough to justify a new course.
автор: Thomas J
•Good material was presented in this course but there were a number of technical errors in the video recordings. If they were cleaned up this course would be perfect.
автор: Jose P
•Topics are a bit vague, which is fine as the content is interesting and useful nonetheless, but perhaps exposition is too lengthy relative to the amount of content.
автор: Robbin R
•Gives good insights on how to work on a Machine Learning project yet. Provides some rule of thumbs for different hick-ups that may be encountered during a project.
автор: Nick S
•even though there are great tips and advices, it does not justify an entire course and they can be mentioned in 3 videos so a lot of the videos were repetitive.
автор: Kan X
•I like this specialization in general. However, this third one has too many overlapping contents and some videos are not that useful. Just personal opinion.
автор: Jkernec
•Homework is lacking. It is too easy to pass. I feel like the programming task or homework task fell short. The lectures were good but too little practice.
автор: Hanbo L
•Good non-technical materials, but short enough to be incorporated into other courses. Some aspects feel subjective. Many typos/minor mistakes in quizzes
автор: vincent p
•Was really enthousiastic about the first two courses in the specialization, the third however felt a bit like going back a step in level of advancement.
автор: Rishabh G
•A different course for only two weeks of content? This is nuts. I waited for 15 days for financial aid to be approved and I completed it within 5 days.
автор: Leitner C S E S
•Only interesting if you don't have much experience with machine learning; Might or might not be great if you are a novice, though - hard to say for me.
автор: Deleted A
•There was some very valuable material. However, I think some of the videos could have been prepared a little bit better and could do with more editing
автор: Carsten F
•Course was less interesting than the other parts. Also very negative that the last part of the 5-part specialization is taking ages to be finalized.
автор: Dany J
•Good content, but could definitely benefit from a more fleshed out problem to solve. The content beg for a larger concrete coding exercice project.
автор: Hugo J
•It's easy and more simple than the others in specialization. Can be more deeper into ML project organization management. It's ok, could be better!
автор: Jordon B
•This course did not contain programming assignments, only quizzes, and was thus considerably less useful, even though the knowledge was important.
автор: ccbttn
•Quite some questions are confusing and some are not correct itself. and this course is more concept based, didn't actually get to program a lot.