madam part-ii

Nice Session

Thank you !!

Great

Good

Good

good

good

Oo

4

I love the example of Boeing and the cool video of real-world stress test. The course hour should be set higher than 11 hr, as much time is needed for self-study. Also some calculation rounds off at early stage and lead to a very different answer.

Material somewhat simplistic and professor likes to "hold your hand" rather than exposing the material and letting the student run with it.

Problems are not explained in depth. There were minor errors. Some points in slides were just skipped or explained with out any examples

Very good course but if you give at least 2 attempts in 24 hours then it would be more interesting in submitting the quiz

Very good 👍 subject to Mechanical engineering...we know everything

About to material

there is lack of information , i wish it can give more information about the field

the course was good but the time between 2 exams was too long, 24 h!

Although the course content is good, it is riddled with simple errors. The teacher often uses the wrong terms for things which makes it difficult to follow. It also has very little to do with machine design, other than using a shaft as an example to calculate stresses, and should be renamed mechanics of materials.

There's much to be desired. Sad that the videos still have remarks. By the was there's no feedback from the teacher only from forum. It might written that you don't need any additional knowlege, but it will happen that explanation won't be engouh. A very poor quality

The quizzes are very difficult to pass, what was actually taught was never sufficient to pass the quizzes therefore I can't continue in this course .

The certificate sign of the teacher is not clear, it shows negative impression to others who see it.

i am already say my financial condition is bad . i am not to able to pay fees

I can't get my certificate

good explain