Chevron Left
Вернуться к Java Programming: Principles of Software Design

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Java Programming: Principles of Software Design от партнера Университет Дьюка

4.6
stars
Оценки: 876
Рецензии: 145

О курсе

Solve real world problems with Java using multiple classes. Learn how to create programming solutions that scale using Java interfaces. Recognize that software engineering is more than writing code - it also involves logical thinking and design. By the end of this course you will have written a program that analyzes and sorts earthquake data, and developed a predictive text generator. After completing this course, you will be able to: 1. Use sorting appropriately in solving problems; 2. Develop classes that implement the Comparable interface; 3. Use timing data to analyze empirical performance; 4. Break problems into multiple classes, each with their own methods; 5. Determine if a class from the Java API can be used in solving a particular problem; 6. Implement programming solutions using multiple approaches and recognize tradeoffs; 7. Use object-oriented concepts including interfaces and abstract classes when developing programs; 8. Appropriately hide implementation decisions so they are not visible in public methods; and 9. Recognize the limitations of algorithms and Java programs in solving problems. 10. Recognize standard Java classes and idioms including exception-handling, static methods, java.net, and java.io packages....

Лучшие рецензии

OI

Aug 08, 2019

My confidence level in Java programming has grown significantly since completing this specialisation. It gave me the necessary knowledge and practice I need to take up a role as a software engineer.

MN

Feb 26, 2017

This nicely packaged course is learner centered. It engages the learner by enforcing practice through interesting exercises and quizzes. Kudos and Thumbs up to the team of great instructors

Фильтр по:

76–100 из 139 отзывов о курсе Java Programming: Principles of Software Design

автор: Nazeeh A

Feb 18, 2019

Amaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazing.

автор: Volodymyr C

Oct 21, 2017

Great course! Thanks.

автор: Mateusz A

Mar 13, 2016

Most excellent MOOC.

автор: shriya t

Sep 05, 2016

excellent course!

автор: Pranta K B

Jan 24, 2016

Nice Course .. :D

автор: badr e

Feb 18, 2017

tres bon cours

автор: BingliangLan

Jun 05, 2019

instructive !

автор: Antonio P

Oct 22, 2016

Great course

автор: greg w

Feb 19, 2016

Challenging!

автор: Yiran Z

Jul 18, 2017

Good Course

автор: Jakub T

Jan 26, 2017

great stuff

автор: Abu Y

Oct 18, 2016

Really Good

автор: Noah P

Jun 12, 2016

good course

автор: Sergey

Dec 21, 2015

Impressive!

автор: Xiaochun M

May 18, 2017

Very good!

автор: Yasmeen G

Nov 02, 2016

GREAAAT♥♥

автор: Hamid S

Aug 09, 2016

Excellent

автор: Obada A

Jul 03, 2017

tank you

автор: Aditya

May 30, 2019

SuperB!

автор: Aleksandr V

Jan 31, 2019

great!

автор: Arislan M

Feb 22, 2016

Great!

автор: hakan33

Apr 20, 2017

best

автор: Abdelrhman B

Nov 26, 2019

1

автор: Bryan Y

Jan 18, 2017

Pacing of this course was all over.

Interface and Abstract classes were introduced and the material and lessons were easy to follow. Sorting using bubble sort, caparable, and comparator operators were also easy to follow. The final week presented topics on exception and try/catch/finally, but provided no practical programs for a student to write to ensure the topics were understood.

The problem was in week 3. N-Grams meant to teach some very important concepts about Markov and predictive text, but failed somewhat since the quizes were not clear and the grading a bit harsh. In the quizes, problems were presented and you either had the right output or you did not. There was no checks available that allowed a student to figure out why code produced the wrong output. In other modules (and courses in this series), input was provided and expected out based on the input was provided to verify code was working correctly. Not in section 3 - you wrote the code, took the quiz, and if you got the answer wrong were left scratching your head as to why, since there were really no means to check.

Don't mistake this feedback as saying the course was bad - it was actually quite good. If the course material for week 3 is updated to include clearer instructions and some better checks to ensure code is working correctly then I will change my review from a four star (it's more 3.5 than 4) to a five star.

автор: Четверухин А А

Jan 10, 2019

Nice course which logically ends the series of four. Finally explains why different duke.edu libraries were used as well as BlueJ, which seemed to be strange choise at the beginning. I've finally understood why interfaces and abstract classes are important and how to use it. I decrease the mark to 4 only due to week 3 tests unclarity around hashmap - I've never worked it out how to get to the test results on hashmap size - it was working fine on small samples, but not matching the answers which were in the quiz for the big files which took a lot of time from me and didn't bring satisfaction.