Отзывы учащихся о курсе Java Programming: Principles of Software Design от партнера Университет Дьюка
О курсе
Лучшие рецензии
OI
Aug 08, 2019
My confidence level in Java programming has grown significantly since completing this specialisation. It gave me the necessary knowledge and practice I need to take up a role as a software engineer.
MN
Feb 26, 2017
This nicely packaged course is learner centered. It engages the learner by enforcing practice through interesting exercises and quizzes. Kudos and Thumbs up to the team of great instructors
76–100 из 139 отзывов о курсе Java Programming: Principles of Software Design
автор: Nazeeh A
•Feb 18, 2019
Amaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazing.
автор: Volodymyr C
•Oct 21, 2017
Great course! Thanks.
автор: Mateusz A
•Mar 13, 2016
Most excellent MOOC.
автор: shriya t
•Sep 05, 2016
excellent course!
автор: Pranta K B
•Jan 24, 2016
Nice Course .. :D
автор: badr e
•Feb 18, 2017
tres bon cours
автор: BingliangLan
•Jun 05, 2019
instructive !
автор: Antonio P
•Oct 22, 2016
Great course
автор: greg w
•Feb 19, 2016
Challenging!
автор: Yiran Z
•Jul 18, 2017
Good Course
автор: Jakub T
•Jan 26, 2017
great stuff
автор: Abu Y
•Oct 18, 2016
Really Good
автор: Noah P
•Jun 12, 2016
good course
автор: Sergey
•Dec 21, 2015
Impressive!
автор: Xiaochun M
•May 18, 2017
Very good!
автор: Yasmeen G
•Nov 02, 2016
GREAAAT♥♥
автор: Hamid S
•Aug 09, 2016
Excellent
автор: Obada A
•Jul 03, 2017
tank you
автор: Aditya
•May 30, 2019
SuperB!
автор: Aleksandr V
•Jan 31, 2019
great!
автор: Arislan M
•Feb 22, 2016
Great!
автор: hakan33
•Apr 20, 2017
best
автор: Abdelrhman B
•Nov 26, 2019
1
автор: Bryan Y
•Jan 18, 2017
Pacing of this course was all over.
Interface and Abstract classes were introduced and the material and lessons were easy to follow. Sorting using bubble sort, caparable, and comparator operators were also easy to follow. The final week presented topics on exception and try/catch/finally, but provided no practical programs for a student to write to ensure the topics were understood.
The problem was in week 3. N-Grams meant to teach some very important concepts about Markov and predictive text, but failed somewhat since the quizes were not clear and the grading a bit harsh. In the quizes, problems were presented and you either had the right output or you did not. There was no checks available that allowed a student to figure out why code produced the wrong output. In other modules (and courses in this series), input was provided and expected out based on the input was provided to verify code was working correctly. Not in section 3 - you wrote the code, took the quiz, and if you got the answer wrong were left scratching your head as to why, since there were really no means to check.
Don't mistake this feedback as saying the course was bad - it was actually quite good. If the course material for week 3 is updated to include clearer instructions and some better checks to ensure code is working correctly then I will change my review from a four star (it's more 3.5 than 4) to a five star.
автор: Четверухин А А
•Jan 10, 2019
Nice course which logically ends the series of four. Finally explains why different duke.edu libraries were used as well as BlueJ, which seemed to be strange choise at the beginning. I've finally understood why interfaces and abstract classes are important and how to use it. I decrease the mark to 4 only due to week 3 tests unclarity around hashmap - I've never worked it out how to get to the test results on hashmap size - it was working fine on small samples, but not matching the answers which were in the quiz for the big files which took a lot of time from me and didn't bring satisfaction.
