Chevron Left
Вернуться к Интернет-гиганты: юридическая и экономическая подоплёка медийных платформ

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Интернет-гиганты: юридическая и экономическая подоплёка медийных платформ от партнера Чикагский университет

4.8
звезд
Оценки: 1,033

О курсе

This seven-week course will explore the relationship between law and technology with a strong focus on the law of the United States with some comparisons to laws around the world, especially in Europe. Tech progress is an important source of economic growth and raises broader questions about the human condition, including how culture evolves and who controls that evolution. Technology also matters in countless other ways as it often establishes the framework in which governments interact with their citizens, both in allowing speech and blocking it and in establishing exactly what the boundaries are between private life and the government. And technology itself is powerfully shaped by the laws that apply in areas as diverse as copyright, antitrust, patents, privacy, speech law and the regulation of networks. The course will explore seven topics: 1. Microsoft: The Desktop vs. The Internet. We will start with a look at the technology path that led to the first personal computer in early 1975, the Altair 8800. That path starts with the vacuum tube, moves to transistors, then to integrated circuits and finally to the microprocessor. We will look at the early days of software on the personal computer and the competition between selling software and open-source approaches as well as the problem of software piracy. We will discus the public good nature of software. The 1981 launch of the IBM PC revolutionized the personal computer market and started the path to Microsoft's powerful position and eventual monopoly in that market with the selection of MS-DOS. We then turn to four antitrust cases against Microsoft: (1) the 1994 U.S. case relating to MS-DOS licensing practices; (2) the U.S. antitrust middleware case over Microsoft’s response to Netscape Navigator; (3) the European Union case regarding Windows Media Player; and (4) the EU browser case over Internet Explorer. These disputes arose at the point of maximal competition between the free-standing personal computer and the Internet world that would come after it and we may know enough now to assess how these cases influenced that competition. 2. Google Emerges (and the World Responds). Google has emerged as one of the dominant platforms of the Internet era and that has led to corresponding scrutiny by regulators throughout the world. Decisions that Google makes about its algorithm can be life altering. Individuals are finding it more difficult to put away past mistakes, as Google never forgets, and businesses can find that their sales plummet if Google moves them from the first page of search results to a later page. With great power comes scrutiny and we will look at how government regulators have evaluated how Google has exercised its power. Both the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the European Union have undertaken substantial investigations of Google’s practices and we will look at both of those. 3. Smartphones. The Internet started on the desktop but the Internet is increasingly mobile and people are seemingly tethered to their smartphones and tablets. And we have seen an interesting shift in that market away from Nokia handsets and the Blackberry to Apple's iPhone and its iOS platform and to the Android platform. The legal infrastructure of smartphones and tablets is extraordinarily complex. We will start by looking at U.S. spectrum policy and the effort to free up 500 megahertz of spectrum. We will look at the activities of standard setting organizations, including the IEEE and the creation of the 802.11 standard and Wi-Fi (or, if you prefer, wifi), the creation of patent pools and the regulation of standard essential patents. We will look at the FTC action against Google/Motorola Mobility and Apple's lawsuit against Samsung over utility and design patents relating to the iPhone. Finally, we will take a brief look at the European Commission's investigation into the Android platform. 4. Nondiscrimination and Network Neutrality. Facebook has more than 1 billion users and measure that against a world population of roughly 7 billion and a total number of Internet users of roughly 2.5 billion. A course on law and technology simply has to grapple with the basic framework for regulating the Internet and a key idea there is the notion of network neutrality. Nondiscrimination obligations are frequent in regulated network industries, but at the same, discrimination can be an important tool of design for communication networks. We will start our look at the Internet by looking at the great first communications network of the United States, the post office and will look in particular at the Post Office Act of 1845. We will then move to modern times and will consider efforts by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to produce sensible and sustainable nondiscrimination conditions for the Internet and will touch briefly on comparisons from around the world. 5. The Day the Music Died? In many ways, the Internet came first to music with the rise of peer-to-peer (p2p) music sharing through Napster and its successors. We start with a look into music platform history and the devices that brought recorded music into the home: the phonograph and the player piano. We turn to radio and the legal regime that puts music on the airwaves, the performing rights organizations like ASCAP and BMI. We look at the antitrust issues associated with the blanket license. We consider a failed music platform, digital audio tape, and the complicated legal regime associated with it, the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992. We will consider the copyright issues raised by the creation and distribution of music and the litigation over the p2p technologies such as Napster and Grokster. The music industry responded to p2p technology by adding digital rights management tools to CDs. As music distribution switched from physical media to digital distribution, we entered the world of Apple and the iPod and iTunes. We consider the DRM issues associated with Apple's music platform as seen by Steve Jobs. We conclude by looking at emerging subscription services like Spotify and the service that Apple is building based on its purchase of Beats. 6. Video: Listening and Watching. Images are some of the most powerful ways in which ideas and speech are communicated and video has long been regulated by the state. That starts as a communications law issue with government regulation of the radio spectrum, but also leads to the design of the television system with the assignment of channels and eventually the definition of digital television. And with the emergence first of cable TV and subsequently the VCR critical copyright roadblocks had to be overcome for new distribution technologies to emerge. We will consider the legal engineering that led to the DVD platform, which was an exercise in patent pools and trademark creation. We will sort through the creation of the digital TV platform and will also look at the copyright underpinnings for Netflix. And we will consider the question of technology neutrality in the content of the copyright fight over a new video distribution entrant, Aereo. Finally, we close the week with a brief look at the incentive spectrum auctions and the possible end of broadcast television. 7. The Mediated Book. Gutenberg revolutionized books with his printing press and for academics, books are sacred objects. But the printed book is on the run and with the rise of the ebook, we are entering a new era, the era of the mediated book. This is more than just a change in technology. We will look at the issues created by the rise of the ebook, issues about control over content and licensing and of the privacy of thought itself. We will also look at the legal skirmishes over this space, including the copyright fair use litigation over Google Books, the Apple e-book antitrust case. And we will look at the Amazon Kindle platform....

Лучшие рецензии

NA

17 апр. 2022 г.

This course provided the background knowledge I needed on the Internet Giants and how they came to be so. Thank you Randy and all the people who worked behind the scenes to deliver this to us.

DC

4 февр. 2017 г.

It was really really cool, I learnt a lot, the readings were always interesting, the course was well-structured, super understandable and easy to follow. I would recommend it wholeheartedly!

Фильтр по:

201–219 из 219 отзывов о курсе Интернет-гиганты: юридическая и экономическая подоплёка медийных платформ

автор: Michal S

•

22 мар. 2016 г.

It was a little different than I expected (more litigations and law in general), but A LOT of new information nevertheless.

автор: Polina A

•

30 мар. 2018 г.

Too difficult for not native speakers to understand the topic but this course brings a lot if information.

автор: Ruslan T

•

21 июля 2020 г.

The course is very interesting, but the 70-question test in Course review (week 9) is too much ...

автор: Joy S

•

15 мая 2019 г.

Really good information on the whole internet thing. Covers all aspects very thoroughtly

автор: Дмитрий О

•

29 июня 2020 г.

Very interesting course, but it's 5 years old and many links aren't working any more.

автор: Felicia I

•

8 июля 2019 г.

Very informational, but found the speed of the lessons could have been faster.

автор: Eugène P P N M

•

24 мар. 2021 г.

Merci au Professeur Randal C. PICKER, à l'Université de Chicago et à Coursera

автор: Twinkle M

•

20 окт. 2020 г.

Becomes very technical in the middle weeks

автор: Abraham M

•

8 мая 2017 г.

Great course! Very comprehensive

автор: Zhao y

•

20 июня 2017 г.

very informative and passionate

автор: Oliver H

•

14 авг. 2016 г.

Loving it.

автор: Masoud H A

•

17 июня 2021 г.

This course felt like a long journey, thankfully, it was presented in short and brief segments thus allowing for some breather from time to time. This was a huge work and professor Randal must have a challenging task in putting all this work together. The downside of the course is the exaggerated use of annoying sounds such as the long stretch of AAAAAAs and MMMMs between the sentences made by the professor which at times disrupted the good contents of the segment. It is a commonly known principle when delivering in public speaking and presentations to avoid the excessive use of such gestures as AMMMMMMS and the likes. At times I had to skip the lecture because of that.

автор: Hellen B

•

8 апр. 2019 г.

It's a kind of 3.5 star review. The course material is interesting and I learned masses, but oh did I get heartily bored of the delivery method. I am sure Professor Picker is an erudite and charming man, however being presented by hour after hour of rambling video became pretty cheerless - I ended up turning the volume off and trying to make sense of the text script. It would have been great if it could have been broken up by some of his excellent writings, blog posts and other formats like interviews etc.

Also - putting multiple complex reading lists in (some of the documents were 100s of pages long) and adding '10 minutes' as the study time is a little disingenuous.

автор: K P

•

17 авг. 2020 г.

Great content, good as an overview for those wanting to understand US copyright and the history of some of the big names, Google, Amazon etc. Now very out of date- with many of the key cases no longer pending but having been decided.

автор: 姚翔

•

26 янв. 2016 г.

考试题目太多了。。。内容也很枯燥。

автор: Pam A K

•

20 окт. 2020 г.

This class was horrible. Randy Picker is an atrocious orator. Whatever translating software was picking up his speech was the worst. After the first week, I couldn't even bear to listening to him anymore so I tried reading the text myself. It is so bad that it literally completely deforms the content of what is being taught. I started skipping to the tests just to get it over with. This content is over five years old. That technology changes daily - and so do laws and court proceedings - this content is severely outdated. Horrible. I'll never take another class if it involves such poor translation, speaker, or course content. I also paid for a certificate for this class. Where is it?

автор: YOUMENG Z

•

29 апр. 2022 г.

The teacher pauses and nonsense too much, often saying a lot of citations or character background introductions that are not related to the course itself, but it does not help the content of the course itself. Often in class it is not clear what you are going to say and repeat what you have already said many times.

автор: Jaspreet S

•

24 авг. 2020 г.

Not happy with the course. The instructor is complicating the concepts. Moreover, the videos are ended abruptly. The concepts are not getting cleared.

автор: David M

•

27 нояб. 2021 г.

One because I can't unenroll.

Coursera Footer

Начните карьеру или продвиньтесь по карьерной лестнице

Популярные курсы и сертификации

Популярные коллекции и статьи

Получите диплом или сертификат онлайн

Coursera

Сообщество

Еще

Учитесь, где угодно
Placeholder
Placeholder
Placeholder