16 мар. 2016 г.
I liked the way the functions & tasks of information design were taught with a hands on approach. I recommend this for anybody keen to understand what information design is and how to make it work.
17 мар. 2016 г.
Great opportunities for me to experience creativity in design. I struggle initially to come up with my own mock ups, and I persisted because I am motivated with what I learned from the modules.
автор: Vaibhav M B•
7 февр. 2017 г.
Content is not that appreciable in terms of technicalities or theory ; But faculty does teach many good things through examples
автор: Yuliya S•
6 дек. 2018 г.
The tasks in assignments of this course were very unclear.
автор: Ilaiya B•
24 апр. 2016 г.
Would have preferred more depth!
автор: Ryan S•
30 июня 2016 г.
I'm several months into this specialization. It seems to practice little of what it preaches in its design and pedagogy. I've paused repeatedly because I find the whole experience needlessly clunky and frustrating, and I rarely feel like I've learned much at the end of the assignments. I often wonder if anyone on the UCSD/Coursera side ever actually tries to complete the assignments. The quiz is missing key links and the questions read as if they were written by someone who's first language is not English. Pretty sloppy effort.
автор: Hanna K•
26 авг. 2018 г.
Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the content of the lessons/lectures - not enough information given, all too general, not concrete enough, therefor I had to learn most of the things on my own (in order to complete the homework).
Also, the instructions for the assignments were not clear enough in my opinion - no examples given for week 2 i 3.
автор: Megan G•
30 мар. 2016 г.
Video lectures did not provide much information. Coursework instructions were unclear (and had typos). I enrolled in November, but the course start date kept getting pushed back by a week or two at a time until it was ready 4 months later. With all of the extra time taken to put the course together, I expected to get a lot more out of it.
автор: Angeline P•
26 апр. 2016 г.
This was the paper I was most looking forward to in the Interaction Design specialisation. Unfortunately it seems as if they ran out of time to design it properly (despite extending its start date several times). I didn't learn what I would've expected and all of the assignments blurred into one another
автор: Erica F•
9 июля 2016 г.
Assignments are not always relevant or clearly explained. More resources on how to complete them properly (for example, suggestions about how to do prototyping and what tools to use) would also help improve this course.
автор: Deleted A•
9 апр. 2016 г.
This specialisation started off good in the first 1-2 courses but has since taken many steps back. The content is dated and not well though through, and it feels like the whole thing could have been put into 2-3 courses
автор: Laura D•
1 мар. 2016 г.
I was quite disappointed by this course, after several delays the course stated months later than originally planned. The videos are badly edited, and there did not seem to be a lot of content within this course.
автор: Ewa B•
20 апр. 2016 г.
I was disappointed by this Course maybe because I had a great expectations for it. Months of delay and poor content.
автор: laura p s•
12 сент. 2016 г.
Some lessons are too simple. The homework is not very clear and you need much more time to do it than it is said.
автор: Sam D•
28 мар. 2018 г.
I didn't feel like the content was that detailed - all seemed very high level/common sense.
автор: Ana M C F•
8 окт. 2021 г.
The way they grade is not that great, it looks like they grade fast without knowing if it is good or bad and select bad but then the feedback is good and Great job! so you still can get a bad grade because of this no matter if the feedback is good. I don't think I will recommend this to anyone because of the way they let anyone that doesn't care about your work grade you.