Jun 04, 2020
Great specialization! Professor Harris not only explain the constructs of Go extremely well but also provides some foundations on software development that every developer should have.
Apr 04, 2020
Ian G Harris teaches the topics in a very understandable way and I felt really happy finding the ways and mistakes which I resolved while implementing Go code during the assignments.
автор: Joseph F•
May 29, 2019
Peer-reviewed assignments are problematic and frustrating. I would never pay for a course that didn't have a TF/TA or Professor grading the assignments. Students can't possibly make judgement calls on code; else the code becomes very narrow and cookie-cutter.
автор: Peter M•
Aug 24, 2020
Why say something in once concise sentence when you can say it in hundreds of words? There is so much unnecessary waffling in all these Go courses. Not to mention mistakes.
автор: Heiko H•
Jan 02, 2020
A broken assigment for more then 1 mon and no one likes to fix this.
All assigments are very hard to understand.
автор: Serge T•
Mar 25, 2019
quite a lot of mistakes in study materials and tests
автор: Justin L•
May 23, 2019
some homework questions are wrong
автор: Yogesh M•
Sep 24, 2019
Too many errors in the content
автор: Ardavan I•
Oct 30, 2019
This course is the only talks and powerpoint slides, there is absolutely no code, monitor screen sharing, etc.
The courses talk about fundamentals and computer science stories. The entire specialization focus is less than 50% on the Go language itself. No Go mod, No libraries, No coding...
For instance, The professor is about to explain a new thing and suddenly remember forgot to mention something before so he jumps to the missing point and then jumps back to continue. HARD to follow up...
The quizzes have many typos/duplicates. That makes you fail!
Overall strongly I do NOT suggest to waste your money or time on this specialization on Coursera.
автор: bob n•
Aug 07, 2020
Spent way too much time debugging presentations to give anything other than a one. Instructor tends to drift. Examples contain stupid typos (parenthesis vs curly brackets, line breaks in places that break the code, stray (or missing) type declarations. Just overall sloppy and I hope this is not representative of the "University" which sponsors this course
автор: Flavio S T•
Apr 22, 2019
The course is extremely basic, not very complete, and full of errors that are being dragged through multiple months, the errors have been flagged on the forums, and they are never fixed. The grading is made by peer review - which could be a good thing, but the rubric for grading are could be completely automated, and it isn't.
автор: Nikita T•
Jun 16, 2020
Bugs in tests. All other tasks review students, so you can't be sure that you did everything well, so it's impossible to study and improve. I would highly recommend to NOT enroll in this specialization.
автор: Pawel B•
Sep 07, 2020
Contradicting requirements in final assignment are not fixed for at least 2 years!
No way to open any kind of discussion when peers rate your assignments against clear checklist.
автор: Gaurav H•
Oct 23, 2019
Course is more theoretical than practical not worthy at all.