Об этом курсе: This is a course about the history of Skepticism from the ancient Greeks to today, with special attention to the political ramifications of questioning man's ability to know the world and himself with any certainty. We will discuss the debates raging between Plato and the Sophists, the rise of Christianity in the Roman world, and the so-called 'Skeptical Crisis' of the Renaissance as well as Pierre Bayle's Skepticism and David Hume's. In addition the Natural Law tradition will be explored and the relationship between Skepticism and Conservatism. In the second part, we will explore the systematic relations between Skepticism and politics. What is skeptical doubt? When is doubt relevant? How does Skepticism relate to tolerance and to freedom of expression? And can it help us to solve political problems not only in a critical, but also in a creative way?
Для кого этот курс: This course is for all those with an interest in the history of philosophy, in political thought, and in more recent theories of knowledge.
Автор: Erasmus University Rotterdam
Преподаватели: Wiep van Bunge, Prof. dr.
Faculty of Philosophy
Преподаватели: Tim De Mey, Dr.
Faculty of Philosophy
| Уровень | Учащийся среднего уровня |
| Язык | English |
| Как пройти курс | Чтобы пройти курс, выполните все оцениваемые задания. |
| Оценки пользователей |
Программа курса
НЕДЕЛЯ 1
Political Origins
We will discuss the historical and philosophical backgrounds to Plato's rejection of democracy: they will turn out to be intimately connected to his rejection of Skepticism. In addition we will present Karl Popper's highly critical assessment of Plato's 'totalitarian' alternative.
3 видео, 3 материала для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: Plato versus the Sophists
- Reading: "Plato, Protagoras, 317e-328d"
- Discussion Prompt: "Plato, Protagoras, 317e-238d"
- Reading: Suggested Reading: "Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, III, 6-9"
- Видео: Karl Popper versus Plato
- Reading: "Plato, Republic, VIII, 555b-569c"
- Discussion Prompt: "Plato, Republic, VIII, 555b-569c" - Question 1
- Discussion Prompt: "Plato, Republic, VIII, 555b-569c" - Question 2
НЕДЕЛЯ 2
Skepticism and Religion
We will sketch some of the skeptical arguments against Christianity developed by Roman philosophers, but we will also see how Skepticism soon turned into an ally of Christian theology. By the end of the seventeenth century, however, Pierre Bayle turned Skepticism into a highly questionable source of support to revealed religion.
2 видео, 1 материал для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: Montaigne to Bayle
- Reading: "Bayle, Philosophical Commentary, II, 9."
- Discussion Prompt: "Bayle, Philosophical Commentary, II, 9."
НЕДЕЛЯ 3
Skepticism and Natural Law
We will turn to the relevance of the early modern natural law tradition, serving as as an antidote to Skepticism. Grotius's efforts will be discussed, and we will see how during the eighteenth century David Hume pushed Skepticism to its ultimate and highly disturbing conclusion.
2 видео, 2 материала для самостоятельного изучения
- Reading: "Hume, Dialogues Concering Natural Religion"
- Видео: Skepticism and Natural Law
- Reading: "Grotius, The Law of War and Peace" (De Iure Belli ac Pacis)
- Discussion Prompt: "Grotius, The Law of War and Peace"
Оцениваемый: How convincing is Hume's conclusion to the Dialogues?
НЕДЕЛЯ 4
Skepticism and Conservatism
We will focus on the intimate relationship between Skepticism and the origins of eighteenth-century conservatism: Edmund Burke's analysis of the French Revolution will be put into perspective. But we will also pay attention to the way in which Skepticism came to serve as a progressive and liberating force, for instance in its critique of biblical authority.
2 видео, 1 материал для самостоятельного изучения
- Reading: "Hume, Part I, Essay III"
- Discussion Prompt: "Hume, Part 1, Essay III" - Question 1
- Discussion Prompt: "Hume, Part 1, Essay III" - Question 2
- Видео: Liberating Skepticism
- Discussion Prompt: Questioning Moses' authorship of the first five books of the Old Testament
НЕДЕЛЯ 5
“There’s a method to his madness”: Responses to Cartesian Skepticism
We will discuss the specific and influential way in which Rene Descartes defined the problems of Skepticism, not only the question whether knowledge is possible, but also the question whether the external world and all the objects and properties in it, really exist. But instead of considering Descartes’ own rationalist response, we will then move on to consider the alternative responses of John Locke, Charles Peirce, and John Austin.
4 видео, 3 материала для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: John Locke’s response to Cartesian Skepticism
- Reading: "Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book II, chapter viii"
- Discussion Prompt: "Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book II, chapter viii"
- Reading: "Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book IV, chapter xi"
- Discussion Prompt: "Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book IV, chapter xi"
- Видео: Abduction and Charles Peirce’s response to Cartesian Skepticism
- Видео: Austin's response to Cartesian Skepticism
- Reading: "Austin, Other Minds, pp. 148-187"
- Discussion Prompt: "Austin, Other Minds, pp. 148-187"
Оцениваемый: Rear Window
НЕДЕЛЯ 6
Fallibilism, prejudices and toleration: Lessons from Pyrrhonian Skepticism
We will address the question whether, in what sense, and to what extent, Skepticism provides good reasons to do away with prejudices and to adopt religious tolerance. First we will distinguish carefully between belief and truth. Then we will consider the attitude of the positive Skeptic: truth exists, but all our beliefs are and remain prejudices. Finally, we will investigate the role that this epistemic predicament plays in arguments for toleration.
4 видео, 1 материал для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: The limits of truth relativism.
- Peer Review: Underground
- Видео: The powers of positive Skepticism
- Discussion Prompt: The relation between Pyrrhonism and Locke
- Reading: Suggested Reading: Locke's real essences
- Видео: The fallibilist argument for toleration
- Peer Review: Nathan the Wise
НЕДЕЛЯ 7
The marketplace of ideas: An imaginative argument for freedom of expression
We will consider Mill’s argument from “the marketplace of ideas” for both freedom of opinion and freedom of expression of opinion. If ideas can compete freely, truth will emerge. Just as a free market is self correcting, speech should not be restricted, because in a free and open encounter, the true and sound ideas will survive, and the false and unsound ideas will vanquish. We will identify the Skeptical assumptions of Mill’s argument and we will evaluate it.
3 видео, 2 материала для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: John Stuart Mill's argument for freedom of expression
- Reading: "Mill, On Liberty, chapter 3"
- Discussion Prompt: "Mill, On Liberty, chapter 3"
- Reading: "Mill, On Liberty, chapter 2"
- Discussion Prompt: "Mill, On Liberty, chapter 2"
- Видео: Paul Feyerabend's principle of proliferation
- Discussion Prompt: The true intellectual heir to Mill
НЕДЕЛЯ 8
The benefit of the doubt: Critical creative problem solving in politics
What is the benefit of the doubt? What good can come from the confrontation with alternative views or rival opinions? First we will learn that one of the most effective ways to boost the carefulness of problem solving processes is by pushing on alternatives. Then we will consider the role of organized doubt in meetings, deliberations or political negotiations; to find a solution or to reach an agreement, the participants should deliberately adopt the perspective of the others and make their rival opinions relevant.
3 видео, 1 материал для самостоятельного изучения
- Видео: The entanglement of critical and creative reasoning
- Peer Review: Merchants of Doubt
- Видео: The creation of contextual relevance and common ground in politics
- Reading: "Bloom, Against Empathy"
- Discussion Prompt: "Bloom, Against Empathy"
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Как это работает
Coursework
Each course is like an interactive textbook, featuring pre-recorded videos, quizzes and projects.
Help from Your Peers
Connect with thousands of other learners and debate ideas, discuss course material, and get help mastering concepts.
Certificates
Earn official recognition for your work, and share your success with friends, colleagues, and employers.
Авторы
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Erasmus University: a top-100 ranked international research university based in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Our academic teaching and research focuses on four areas: health, wealth, culture and governance.
Erasmus University Rotterdam: make it happen.
Рейтинги и отзывы
Great course, but I really disliked the course requirement to watch full-length films in order to progress with the assignments. The points being lectured were not complicated or detailed enough to warrant 2 hours of YouTube-styled films to demonstrate the issues being discussed in the courses.
Very good materials and quality videos. Great teachers. This course made me decide upon Erasmus as the university i want to study at, next year.
Nice Course. Enjoyed the concepts. Thanks, sincerely
Coursera делает лучшее в мире образование доступным каждому, предлагая онлайн-курсы от ведущих университетов и организаций.
© Coursera Inc., 2018 Все права защищены.
TT
Loved the lessons, structure, and the professors.