Chevron Left
Вернуться к Disaster Risk Management and Korean Policies

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Disaster Risk Management and Korean Policies от партнера Университет Ёнсе

Оценки: 48
Рецензии: 11

О курсе

In the past, developing countries such as Korea lacked guidelines for exploring effective policies for disaster-resilient growth, resulting in unnecessary sacrifices in terms of time, resources, and human capital. Through the lessons learned by Korea, currently developing countries facing socio-economic development can build disaster resilience without sacrifices. Utilizing Korea's sound practices and institutional reforms, this course provides a valuable roadmap to prevent and mitigate the catastrophic effects of disasters. This course also provides insightful inspiration about what are the characteristics and the historical path of major disasters; how major disasters arise and affect policy changes; how science and technology can be used to explore and find solutions to complex tasks; and especially, what nations and institutes need to do reduce disaster risk and mitigate death and economic turmoil in the wake of disasters. Throught this, students will be able to explain not only what is disaster risk management but also what must be done for a disaster resilent future....

Лучшие рецензии

Фильтр по:

1–11 из 11 отзывов о курсе Disaster Risk Management and Korean Policies

автор: Hu C

Apr 17, 2020

Good course! I really enjoyed it! It provided a really good introduction to disaster risk management. As a non-Korean student (I'm Taiwanese), sometime I found the content specifically related to the Korean content a bit dry. Yet afterwards I realized that it was very valuable to dive into one country's history and situation and I indeed learnt a lot from knowing these things. Some engineering/technological parts were slightly demanding for me (as someone having non-STEM background) but it was definitely doable as long as you spent a little more time on those topics. In the end I found the knowledge about these technologies very interesting. The exam questions and (some of) prompt discussion topics were confusing or unnecessarily detailed. That might be something worth-adjusting. Also there are some mistakes in the videos' subtitles.

Overall, I recommend this course! I could feel the passion of the two lecturers from the screen.

автор: Bienvenido G J

Aug 19, 2020

SOKOR policy on DRM reflects on how they evolved from misery to success. The Philippines(my home country) should adapt their DRM policy in drafting its DRM laws, policies for LGU's, school curricula and industry standards for DRM.

автор: Fatima M

Oct 16, 2020

Interesting viewpoints on Korean disaster risk management policies and programs as well as a peek into understanding disasters as a global concern

автор: Humberto G M

Jul 13, 2020

It has accurate views on comprehensive risk management. They use technology as an aid to the different stages of the risk.

автор: Juan A P P

Apr 08, 2020

Very interesting course. They could get it longer!! It'd be nice to keep studing with those great proffesors

автор: Amor Y

May 07, 2020

Excellent course to understand all aspects of disaster risk management

автор: Sohan A

Oct 19, 2019


I liked the course - very insightful to Korea's existing DRM setup.

I would have preferred more interaction by the Professors, as an alternative to simply reading the content on the visible slide.

Thank you - Sohan

автор: Saad A A

Jun 30, 2020

overall is good


Oct 18, 2020

good to choose

автор: Pablo B

Mar 02, 2020

It has updated content (mostly from South Korea) and it's ok because there are plenty of lessons learned but the main instructor has a heavy pronunciation issue. I had to read 99.9% of the transcript in order to understand and this is uncomfortable since I had to stop to watch the presented slides.

I work in the insurance industry and found very interesting information but as I mentioned before, the course organizers should choose a different person when explanations are given in English.

автор: Fernando A M M

Oct 02, 2020

The English is awful and the exams are full of typos and linguistic mistakes.