Отзывы учащихся о курсе Набор инструментальных средств для специалистов по обработке данных от партнера Университет Джонса Хопкинса
О курсе
(рецензий: 243)
(рецензий: 1056)
Лучшие рецензии
LR
7 сент. 2017 г.
It was really insightful, coming from knowing almost nothing about statistics or experimental design, it was easy to understand while not feeling shallow. Just the right amount of information density.
SF
14 апр. 2020 г.
As a business student from Bangladesh who is aspiring to be a data analyst in near future, I love this course very much. The quizzes and assessments were the places to check how much I exactly learnt.
6851–6875 из 7,040 отзывов о курсе Набор инструментальных средств для специалистов по обработке данных
автор: Adam D
•12 июня 2017 г.
If you can install R & RStudio and sign up for Github, then you're 80% finished with this course before you start.
автор: Alex L
•1 мар. 2021 г.
Link does not blue-highlight in the last question and confuses the graders to think that the link does not work.
автор: WAN
•23 нояб. 2020 г.
I don't like the new way of presenting online course. The voice is very artificial which makes me less engaged.
автор: Andrew T
•3 янв. 2018 г.
Basic setup of R and Git.
Prefer Treehouse's integrated workshop structure for tasks like these and/or youtube.
автор: Matthew W
•1 апр. 2016 г.
Extremely remedial. Not worth the time or cost on it's own, unfortunately it's required for the specialization.
автор: Owen I
•15 нояб. 2016 г.
Is this entire course going to be watching videos of powerpoint slideshows, wrapped in a rather buggy website?
автор: SAI V K
•2 июня 2016 г.
they made this many courses as they can earn more money.I dont think this course should me taught seperately
автор: Andrew W
•20 апр. 2017 г.
Very, very, very basic intro. The entire 4 weeks could have (and should have) been condensed into 1 week.
автор: Paolo D
•7 нояб. 2016 г.
I didnt learn anything about data science. I could have learned how to install all those tools by myself
автор: Andy I
•17 сент. 2016 г.
There just wasn't much to this class. It's not bad information, but it could have been done in one week.
автор: Agustin G
•20 июня 2016 г.
It's an extremely basic introduction... which doesn't help in much for the next session (R Programming)
автор: Eva B
•28 янв. 2018 г.
OK course. A brief overview, but the sequence of material isn't that well thought out in my opinion.
автор: Christopher W P
•9 февр. 2018 г.
VERY basic course, some of the week's assignments were simply installing software for future use...
автор: Anit B
•27 июня 2016 г.
Introductory Course mostly around installation and setup for the other courses in Specializations
автор: Sergey I
•10 мар. 2016 г.
Maybe, I am already somehow experienced, but I think that the time I spent on that was a waste :/
автор: Brian F
•15 июня 2017 г.
This course is very basic and takes nowhere near 1 month. I spent about 3 hours in total on it.
автор: Nayef
•30 мар. 2017 г.
i feel that the course need more explanation .. i got really lost in the begging of the HW
автор: Raviprakash R S
•13 февр. 2017 г.
This module is just enough material for 1 or 2 lectures with "How to get started" notes..
автор: Abhijeet S
•17 окт. 2020 г.
Course is okayish, automated voice is bit annoying and some contents are not up to date
автор: Mike J
•26 янв. 2016 г.
Good introduction of what is to come, but nothing too provocative or thought provoking.
автор: Urmil T
•3 авг. 2020 г.
Automated Voice is not helpful as it doesn't let you concentrate and makes you sleepy.
автор: Mohamed H
•31 авг. 2020 г.
The automated voice is extremely annoying but apart from that everything is good
автор: Abdallah A
•2 мар. 2019 г.
The instructor is an automated speaker, it was too bad, I couldn't focus at all.
автор: 潇湘夜雨动清愁
•7 мая 2016 г.
the speech is too fast to be catch up with and doesn't have much useful contents
автор: matthieu c
•3 июня 2017 г.
Absolutely interesting, but a loss of time if someone already knows the basics.
Coursera Footer
